Correcting Model Bias with Sparse Implicit Processes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10673v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:00:01 GMT
• Title: Correcting Model Bias with Sparse Implicit Processes
• Authors: Sim\'on Rodr\'iguez Santana, Luis A. Ortega Andr\'es, Daniel Hern\'andez-Lobato, Bryan Zald\'ivar
• Abstract summary: We show that Sparse Implicit Processes (SIP) is capable of correcting model bias when the data generating mechanism differs strongly from the one implied by the model. We use synthetic datasets to show that SIP is capable of providing predictive distributions that reflect the data better than the exact predictions of the initial, but wrongly assumed model.
• Score: 0.9187159782788579
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Model selection in machine learning (ML) is a crucial part of the Bayesian learning procedure. Model choice may impose strong biases on the resulting predictions, which can hinder the performance of methods such as Bayesian neural networks and neural samplers. On the other hand, newly proposed approaches for Bayesian ML exploit features of approximate inference in function space with implicit stochastic processes (a generalization of Gaussian processes). The approach of Sparse Implicit Processes (SIP) is particularly successful in this regard, since it is fully trainable and achieves flexible predictions. Here, we expand on the original experiments to show that SIP is capable of correcting model bias when the data generating mechanism differs strongly from the one implied by the model. We use synthetic datasets to show that SIP is capable of providing predictive distributions that reflect the data better than the exact predictions of the initial, but wrongly assumed model.

Related papers

• Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
  Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling. Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability. In this paper, we aim to help address such challenges by developing an textitinfluence functions framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z)
• A variational neural Bayes framework for inference on intractable posterior distributions [1.0801976288811024]
  Posterior distributions of model parameters are efficiently obtained by feeding observed data into a trained neural network. We show theoretically that our posteriors converge to the true posteriors in Kullback-Leibler divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T20:40:15Z)
• Fusion of Gaussian Processes Predictions with Monte Carlo Sampling [61.31380086717422]
  In science and engineering, we often work with models designed for accurate prediction of variables of interest. Recognizing that these models are approximations of reality, it becomes desirable to apply multiple models to the same data and integrate their outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T04:21:21Z)
• Diffusion models for probabilistic programming [56.47577824219207]
  Diffusion Model Variational Inference (DMVI) is a novel method for automated approximate inference in probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) DMVI is easy to implement, allows hassle-free inference in PPLs without the drawbacks of, e.g., variational inference using normalizing flows, and does not make any constraints on the underlying neural network model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T12:17:05Z)
• Self-Supervised Dataset Distillation for Transfer Learning [77.4714995131992]
  We propose a novel problem of distilling an unlabeled dataset into a set of small synthetic samples for efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) We first prove that a gradient of synthetic samples with respect to a SSL objective in naive bilevel optimization is textitbiased due to randomness originating from data augmentations or masking. We empirically validate the effectiveness of our method on various applications involving transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:48:52Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Latent Gaussian Model Boosting [0.0]
  Tree-boosting shows excellent predictive accuracy on many data sets. We obtain increased predictive accuracy compared to existing approaches in both simulated and real-world data experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T07:36:30Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Gaussian Process Regression with Local Explanation [28.90948136731314]
  We propose GPR with local explanation, which reveals the feature contributions to the prediction of each sample. In the proposed model, both the prediction and explanation for each sample are performed using an easy-to-interpret locally linear model. For a new test sample, the proposed model can predict the values of its target variable and weight vector, as well as their uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T13:22:24Z)
• Gaussian Process Boosting [13.162429430481982]
  We introduce a novel way to combine boosting with Gaussian process and mixed effects models. We obtain increased prediction accuracy compared to existing approaches on simulated and real-world data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T13:19:54Z)
• A comprehensive study on the prediction reliability of graph neural networks for virtual screening [0.0]
  We investigate the effects of model architectures, regularization methods, and loss functions on the prediction performance and reliability of classification results. Our result highlights that correct choice of regularization and inference methods is evidently important to achieve high success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T10:13:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.