"Do you follow me?": A Survey of Recent Approaches in Dialogue State
Tracking
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14627v1
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:53:22 GMT
- Title: "Do you follow me?": A Survey of Recent Approaches in Dialogue State
Tracking
- Authors: L\'eo Jacqmin, Lina M. Rojas-Barahona, Benoit Favre
- Abstract summary: A task-oriented dialogue system has to track the user's needs at each turn according to the conversation history.
This process called dialogue state tracking (DST) is crucial because it directly informs the downstream dialogue policy.
Although neural approaches have enabled significant progress, we argue that some critical aspects of dialogue systems such as generalizability are still underexplored.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While communicating with a user, a task-oriented dialogue system has to track
the user's needs at each turn according to the conversation history. This
process called dialogue state tracking (DST) is crucial because it directly
informs the downstream dialogue policy. DST has received a lot of interest in
recent years with the text-to-text paradigm emerging as the favored approach.
In this review paper, we first present the task and its associated datasets.
Then, considering a large number of recent publications, we identify highlights
and advances of research in 2021-2022. Although neural approaches have enabled
significant progress, we argue that some critical aspects of dialogue systems
such as generalizability are still underexplored. To motivate future studies,
we propose several research avenues.
Related papers
- Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems [29.394466123216258]
This study provides a comprehensive overview of the primary characteristics of a dialogue agent, their corresponding open-domain datasets, and the methods used to benchmark these datasets.
We propose UNIT, a UNified dIalogue dataseT constructed from conversations of existing datasets for different dialogue tasks capturing the nuances for each of them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T10:05:47Z) - SpokenWOZ: A Large-Scale Speech-Text Benchmark for Spoken Task-Oriented
Dialogue Agents [72.42049370297849]
SpokenWOZ is a large-scale speech-text dataset for spoken TOD.
Cross-turn slot and reasoning slot detection are new challenges for SpokenWOZ.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T13:47:51Z) - A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospects [100.75759050696355]
We provide a comprehensive overview of the prominent problems and advanced designs for conversational agent's proactivity in different types of dialogues.
We discuss challenges that meet the real-world application needs but require a greater research focus in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T11:38:49Z) - Precognition in Task-oriented Dialogue Understanding: Posterior
Regularization by Future Context [8.59600111891194]
We propose to jointly model historical and future information through the posterior regularization method.
We optimize the KL distance between these to regularize our model during training.
Experiments on two dialogue datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-07T09:58:50Z) - Automatic Evaluation and Moderation of Open-domain Dialogue Systems [59.305712262126264]
A long standing challenge that bothers the researchers is the lack of effective automatic evaluation metrics.
This paper describes the data, baselines and results obtained for the Track 5 at the Dialogue System Technology Challenge 10 (DSTC10)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T10:08:05Z) - Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey [51.215629336320305]
Training machines to understand natural language and interact with humans is an elusive and essential task of artificial intelligence.
This paper reviews the previous methods from the technical perspective of dialogue modeling for the dialogue comprehension task.
In addition, we categorize dialogue-related pre-training techniques which are employed to enhance PrLMs in dialogue scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T03:52:37Z) - Dialogue State Tracking with Multi-Level Fusion of Predicted Dialogue
States and Conversations [2.6529642559155944]
We propose the Dialogue State Tracking with Multi-Level Fusion of Predicted Dialogue States and Conversations network.
This model extracts information of each dialogue turn by modeling interactions among each turn utterance, the corresponding last dialogue states, and dialogue slots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T02:30:30Z) - A Survey on Dialogue Summarization: Recent Advances and New Frontiers [19.07064815868915]
We provide an overview of publicly available research datasets, summarize existing works according to the domain of input dialogue and organize leaderboards under unified metrics.
We hope that this first survey of dialogue summarization can provide the community with a quick access and a general picture to this task and motivate future researches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T12:11:14Z) - Comprehensive Study: How the Context Information of Different
Granularity Affects Dialogue State Tracking? [17.476030563395714]
Dialogue state tracking (DST) plays a key role in task-oriented dialogue systems to monitor the user's goal.
In general, there are two strategies to track a dialogue state: predicting it from scratch and updating it from previous state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-08T03:18:13Z) - Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey [51.215629336320305]
We review the previous methods from the perspective of dialogue modeling.
We discuss three typical patterns of dialogue modeling that are widely-used in dialogue comprehension tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-04T15:50:17Z) - Rethinking Dialogue State Tracking with Reasoning [76.0991910623001]
This paper proposes to track dialogue states gradually with reasoning over dialogue turns with the help of the back-end data.
Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by 38.6% in terms of joint belief accuracy for MultiWOZ 2.1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T02:05:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.