Vector-Based Data Improves Left-Right Eye-Tracking Classifier
Performance After a Covariate Distributional Shift
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.00465v1
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 16:27:50 GMT
- Title: Vector-Based Data Improves Left-Right Eye-Tracking Classifier
Performance After a Covariate Distributional Shift
- Abstract summary: We propose a fine-grain data approach for EEG-ET data collection in order to create more robust benchmarking.
We train machine learning models utilizing both coarse-grain and fine-grain data and compare their accuracies when tested on data of similar/different distributional patterns.
Results showed that models trained on fine-grain, vector-based data were less susceptible to distributional shifts than models trained on coarse-grain, binary-classified data.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The main challenges of using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals to make
eye-tracking (ET) predictions are the differences in distributional patterns
between benchmark data and real-world data and the noise resulting from the
unintended interference of brain signals from multiple sources. Increasing the
robustness of machine learning models in predicting eye-tracking position from
EEG data is therefore integral for both research and consumer use. In medical
research, the usage of more complicated data collection methods to test for
simpler tasks has been explored to address this very issue. In this study, we
propose a fine-grain data approach for EEG-ET data collection in order to
create more robust benchmarking. We train machine learning models utilizing
both coarse-grain and fine-grain data and compare their accuracies when tested
on data of similar/different distributional patterns in order to determine how
susceptible EEG-ET benchmarks are to differences in distributional data. We
apply a covariate distributional shift to test for this susceptibility. Results
showed that models trained on fine-grain, vector-based data were less
susceptible to distributional shifts than models trained on coarse-grain,
binary-classified data.
Related papers
- Should I Use This Synthetic Dataset for Training? How to Test with Minimal Real Data [73.19814469893088]
Digital twins and learned world models are increasingly used to generate synthetic data that augment the scarce real datasets available for training artificial intelligence (AI) models in engineering systems.<n>This paper addresses whether training on the augmented dataset improves the true, population-level performance, while consuming as few real test data points as possible.<n>Experiments on a synthetic-data classification task, a DT-aided wireless packet-scheduling task, and a radio-map prediction task show that aeSFT identifies useful synthetic data using substantially fewer real test samples than mean-based sequential testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-28T07:05:38Z) - Investigating Data Interventions for Subgroup Fairness: An ICU Case Study [3.9822386990811593]
In high-stakes settings where machine learning models are used to automate decision-making about individuals, the presence of algorithmic bias can exacerbate systemic harm.<n>We investigate the limitations of combining data sources to improve subgroup performance within the context of healthcare.<n>We find that data addition can both help and hurt model fairness and performance, and many intuitive strategies for data selection are unreliable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-03T21:56:59Z) - A Semi-supervised CART Model for Covariate Shift [0.0]
This paper introduces a semi-supervised classification and regression tree (CART) that uses importance weighting to address distribution discrepancies.
Our method improves the predictive performance of the CART model by assigning greater weights to training samples.
Through simulation studies and applications to real-world medical data, we demonstrate significant improvements in predictive accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T12:53:23Z) - Can EEG resting state data benefit data-driven approaches for motor-imagery decoding? [4.870701423888026]
We propose a feature concatenation approach to enhance decoding models' generalization.
We combine the EEGNet model, a standard convolutional neural network for EEG signal classification, with functional connectivity measures derived from resting-state EEG data.
While an improvement in mean accuracy for within-user scenarios is observed, concatenation doesn't benefit across-user scenarios when compared with random data concatenation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T07:18:32Z) - DiffPuter: Empowering Diffusion Models for Missing Data Imputation [56.48119008663155]
This paper introduces DiffPuter, a tailored diffusion model combined with the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm for missing data imputation.<n>Our theoretical analysis shows that DiffPuter's training step corresponds to the maximum likelihood estimation of data density.<n>Our experiments show that DiffPuter achieves an average improvement of 6.94% in MAE and 4.78% in RMSE compared to the most competitive existing method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T08:35:56Z) - Measuring and Improving Attentiveness to Partial Inputs with Counterfactuals [91.59906995214209]
We propose a new evaluation method, Counterfactual Attentiveness Test (CAT)
CAT uses counterfactuals by replacing part of the input with its counterpart from a different example, expecting an attentive model to change its prediction.
We show that GPT3 becomes less attentive with an increased number of demonstrations, while its accuracy on the test data improves.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T06:27:35Z) - Machine Learning Based Missing Values Imputation in Categorical Datasets [2.5611256859404983]
This research looked into the use of machine learning algorithms to fill in the gaps in categorical datasets.
The emphasis was on ensemble models constructed using the Error Correction Output Codes framework.
Deep learning for missing data imputation has obstacles despite these encouraging results, including the requirement for large amounts of labeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-10T03:29:48Z) - Convolutional Monge Mapping Normalization for learning on sleep data [63.22081662149488]
We propose a new method called Convolutional Monge Mapping Normalization (CMMN)
CMMN consists in filtering the signals in order to adapt their power spectrum density (PSD) to a Wasserstein barycenter estimated on training data.
Numerical experiments on sleep EEG data show that CMMN leads to significant and consistent performance gains independent from the neural network architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T08:24:01Z) - Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data.
We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z) - SynBench: Task-Agnostic Benchmarking of Pretrained Representations using
Synthetic Data [78.21197488065177]
Recent success in fine-tuning large models, that are pretrained on broad data at scale, on downstream tasks has led to a significant paradigm shift in deep learning.
This paper proposes a new task-agnostic framework, textitSynBench, to measure the quality of pretrained representations using synthetic data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-06T15:25:00Z) - Too Fine or Too Coarse? The Goldilocks Composition of Data Complexity
for Robust Left-Right Eye-Tracking Classifiers [0.0]
We train machine learning models utilizing a mixed dataset composed of both fine- and coarse-grain data.
For our purposes, finer-grain data refers to data collected using more complex methods whereas coarser-grain data refers to data collected using more simple methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-24T23:18:08Z) - Improving the efficacy of Deep Learning models for Heart Beat detection
on heterogeneous datasets [0.0]
We investigate the issues related to applying a Deep Learning model on heterogeneous datasets.
We show that the performance of a model trained on data from healthy subjects decreases when applied to patients with cardiac conditions.
We then evaluate the use of Transfer Learning to adapt the model to the different datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T14:26:55Z) - Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With
Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model.
We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data.
Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z) - Medical data wrangling with sequential variational autoencoders [5.9207487081080705]
This paper proposes to model medical data records with heterogeneous data types and bursty missing data using sequential variational autoencoders (VAEs)
We show that Shi-VAE achieves the best performance in terms of using both metrics, with lower computational complexity than the GP-VAE model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T10:59:26Z) - Negative Data Augmentation [127.28042046152954]
We show that negative data augmentation samples provide information on the support of the data distribution.
We introduce a new GAN training objective where we use NDA as an additional source of synthetic data for the discriminator.
Empirically, models trained with our method achieve improved conditional/unconditional image generation along with improved anomaly detection capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-09T20:28:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.