Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05633v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 04:12:50 GMT
- Title: Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs
- Authors: Jerome Taupin, Yassir Jedra, Alexandre Proutiere
- Abstract summary: We investigate the problem of best identification in discounted linear Markov+Delta Decision in the fixed confidence setting under a generative model.
The lower bound as the solution of an intricate non- optimization program can be used as the starting point to devise such algorithms.
- Score: 70.57916977441262
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We investigate the problem of best policy identification in discounted linear
Markov Decision Processes in the fixed confidence setting under a generative
model. We first derive an instance-specific lower bound on the expected number
of samples required to identify an $\varepsilon$-optimal policy with
probability $1-\delta$. The lower bound characterizes the optimal sampling rule
as the solution of an intricate non-convex optimization program, but can be
used as the starting point to devise simple and near-optimal sampling rules and
algorithms. We devise such algorithms. One of these exhibits a sample
complexity upper bounded by ${\cal O}({\frac{d}{(\varepsilon+\Delta)^2}}
(\log(\frac{1}{\delta})+d))$ where $\Delta$ denotes the minimum reward gap of
sub-optimal actions and $d$ is the dimension of the feature space. This upper
bound holds in the moderate-confidence regime (i.e., for all $\delta$), and
matches existing minimax and gap-dependent lower bounds. We extend our
algorithm to episodic linear MDPs.
Related papers
- Projection by Convolution: Optimal Sample Complexity for Reinforcement Learning in Continuous-Space MDPs [56.237917407785545]
We consider the problem of learning an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in a general class of continuous-space Markov decision processes (MDPs) having smooth Bellman operators.
Key to our solution is a novel projection technique based on ideas from harmonic analysis.
Our result bridges the gap between two popular but conflicting perspectives on continuous-space MDPs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T09:58:47Z) - Low-Rank Bandits via Tight Two-to-Infinity Singular Subspace Recovery [45.601316850669406]
We present efficient algorithms for policy evaluation, best policy identification and regret minimization.
For policy evaluation and best policy identification, we show that our algorithms are nearly minimax optimal.
All the proposed algorithms consist of two phases: they first leverage spectral methods to estimate the left and right singular subspaces of the low-rank reward matrix.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-24T06:36:08Z) - Nearly Minimax Optimal Regret for Learning Linear Mixture Stochastic
Shortest Path [80.60592344361073]
We study the Shortest Path (SSP) problem with a linear mixture transition kernel.
An agent repeatedly interacts with a environment and seeks to reach certain goal state while minimizing the cumulative cost.
Existing works often assume a strictly positive lower bound of the iteration cost function or an upper bound of the expected length for the optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T07:52:00Z) - Sharper Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Average-reward Markov
Decision Processes [21.77276136591518]
We develop provably efficient model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)
In the simulator setting, we propose a model-free RL algorithm that finds an $epsilon$-optimal policy using $widetildeO left(fracSAmathrmsp(h*)epsilon2+fracS2Amathrmsp(h*)epsilon2right)$ samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-28T17:43:19Z) - Near Sample-Optimal Reduction-based Policy Learning for Average Reward
MDP [58.13930707612128]
This work considers the sample complexity of obtaining an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in an average reward Markov Decision Process (AMDP)
We prove an upper bound of $widetilde O(H varepsilon-3 ln frac1delta)$ samples per state-action pair, where $H := sp(h*)$ is the span of bias of any optimal policy, $varepsilon$ is the accuracy and $delta$ is the failure probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-01T15:57:58Z) - Instance-optimal PAC Algorithms for Contextual Bandits [20.176752818200438]
In this work, we focus on the bandit problem in the $(epsilon,delta)$-$textitPAC$ setting.
We show that no algorithm can be simultaneously minimax-optimal regret minimization and instance-dependent PAC for best-arm identification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-05T23:19:43Z) - Minimax Optimal Quantization of Linear Models: Information-Theoretic
Limits and Efficient Algorithms [59.724977092582535]
We consider the problem of quantizing a linear model learned from measurements.
We derive an information-theoretic lower bound for the minimax risk under this setting.
We show that our method and upper-bounds can be extended for two-layer ReLU neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-23T02:39:04Z) - Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in $\ell_1$
Geometry [69.24618367447101]
Up to logarithmic factors the optimal excess population loss of any $(varepsilon,delta)$-differently private is $sqrtlog(d)/n + sqrtd/varepsilon n.$
We show that when the loss functions satisfy additional smoothness assumptions, the excess loss is upper bounded (up to logarithmic factors) by $sqrtlog(d)/n + (log(d)/varepsilon n)2/3.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T06:53:44Z) - Optimal $\delta$-Correct Best-Arm Selection for Heavy-Tailed
Distributions [2.2940141855172036]
We consider the problem of identifying the one with the maximum mean using a $delta$-correct algorithm.
Lower bounds for $delta$-correct algorithms are well known.
We propose a $delta$-correct algorithm that matches the lower bound as $delta$ reduces to zero.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-08-24T05:31:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.