Proposals for Resolving Consenting Issues with Signals and User-side Dialogues

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05786v1
• Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:30:32 GMT
• Title: Proposals for Resolving Consenting Issues with Signals and User-side Dialogues
• Authors: Harshvardhan J. Pandit
• Abstract summary: This work presents known problems based on requirements grouped into two categories: (i) UI/UX for consenting; and (ii) power imbalance in expressing consent. To resolve this, it presents two proposals: First, the use of automation through privacy signals to better govern consenting processes and to reduce consent-fatigue'
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Consent dialogues are a source of annoyance, malicious intent, dark patterns, illegal practices and a plethora of other issues. This work presents known problems based on GDPR requirements grouped into two categories: (i) UI/UX for consenting; and (ii) power imbalance in expressing consent. To resolve this, it presents two proposals: First, the use of automation through privacy signals to better govern consenting processes and to reduce `consent-fatigue'. Second, as generation of consent dialogues on the user side and its practicalities for both websites as well as users and agents (e.g. web browsers). Both proposals are discussed in terms of possibilities for implementation and suitability for stakeholders. The article concludes with a discussion on the difficulties in achieving such solutions owing to the conflicts of interest between `web-enablers' and `web-consumers', and the necessity for the EU to take a direct stance in addressing these in their future laws.

Related papers

• On Mitigating Data Sparsity in Conversational Recommender Systems [69.70761335240738]
  Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) capture user preference through textual information in dialogues.<n>They suffer from data sparsity on two fronts: the dialogue space is vast and linguistically diverse, while the item space exhibits long-tail and sparse distributions.<n>Existing methods struggle with (1) generalizing to varied dialogue expressions due to underutilization of rich textual cues, and (2) learning informative item representations under severe sparsity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T06:54:51Z)
• Information Bargaining: Bilateral Commitment in Bayesian Persuasion [60.3761154043329]
  We introduce a unified framework and a well-structured solution concept for long-term persuasion.<n>This perspective makes explicit the common knowledge of the game structure and grants the receiver comparable commitment capabilities.<n>The framework is validated through a two-stage validation-and-inference paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T08:42:34Z)
• Beyond Whole Dialogue Modeling: Contextual Disentanglement for Conversational Recommendation [22.213312621287482]
  This paper proposes a novel model to introduce contextual disentanglement for improving conversational recommender systems. DisenCRS employs a dual disentanglement framework, including self-supervised contrastive disentanglement and counterfactual inference disentanglement. Experimental results on two widely used public datasets demonstrate that DisenCRS significantly outperforms existing conversational recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T10:33:26Z)
• A Hate Speech Moderated Chat Application: Use Case for GDPR and DSA Compliance [0.0]
  This research presents a novel application capable of implementing legal and ethical reasoning into the content moderation process. Two use cases fundamental to online communication are presented and implemented using technologies such as GPT-3.5, Solid Pods, and the rule language Prova. The work proposes a novel approach to reason within different legal and ethical definitions of hate speech and plan the fitting counter hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T08:28:38Z)
• Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models [49.74265453289855]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now accessible to anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection via browser-based interfaces. This paper examines the affordances of interactive feedback features in ChatGPT's interface, analysing how they shape user input and participation in iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T13:50:37Z)
• Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management [71.99446449877038]
  We propose a more comprehensive approach called Demarcation scoring abusive speech based on four aspect -- (i) severity scale; (ii) presence of a target; (iii) context scale; (iv) legal scale. Our work aims to inform future strategies for effectively addressing abusive speech online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T21:45:33Z)
• PresAIse, A Prescriptive AI Solution for Enterprises [6.523929486550928]
  This paper outlines an initiative from IBM Research, aiming to address some of these challenges by offering a suite of prescriptive AI solutions. The solution suite includes scalable causal inference methods, interpretable decision-making approaches, and the integration of large language models. A proof-of-concept, PresAIse, demonstrates the solutions' potential by enabling non-ML experts to interact with prescriptive AI models via a natural language interface.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T03:23:08Z)
• SocraSynth: Multi-LLM Reasoning with Conditional Statistics [2.5200794639628032]
  Large language models (LLMs) face criticisms for biases, hallucinations, and a lack of reasoning capability. This paper introduces Socra Synth, a multi-LLM agent reasoning platform developed to mitigate these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T07:16:21Z)
• EM Pre-training for Multi-party Dialogue Response Generation [86.25289241604199]
  In multi-party dialogues, the addressee of a response utterance should be specified before it is generated. We propose an Expectation-Maximization (EM) approach that iteratively performs the expectation steps to generate addressee labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T09:22:41Z)
• User Satisfaction Estimation with Sequential Dialogue Act Modeling in Goal-oriented Conversational Systems [65.88679683468143]
  We propose a novel framework, namely USDA, to incorporate the sequential dynamics of dialogue acts for predicting user satisfaction. USDA incorporates the sequential transitions of both content and act features in the dialogue to predict the user satisfaction. Experimental results on four benchmark goal-oriented dialogue datasets show that the proposed method substantially and consistently outperforms existing methods on USE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T02:50:07Z)
• Deciding Whether to Ask Clarifying Questions in Large-Scale Spoken Language Understanding [28.195853603190447]
  A large-scale conversational agent can suffer from understanding user utterances with various ambiguities. We propose a neural self-attentive model that leverages the hypotheses with ambiguities and contextual signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T22:32:10Z)
• ConvAI3: Generating Clarifying Questions for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems (ClariQ) [64.60303062063663]
  This document presents a detailed description of the challenge on clarifying questions for dialogue systems (ClariQ) The challenge is organized as part of the Conversational AI challenge series (ConvAI3) at Search Oriented Conversational AI (SCAI) EMNLP workshop in 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-23T19:48:02Z)
• Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspective [23.99411145447749]
  We argue that user engagement with data privacy and security through consent banners has become a ubiquitous part of interacting with internet services. Our analysis builds upon designer, interface, user, and social context lenses to raise tensions and synergies that arise together in complex, contingent, and conflicting ways. We conclude with opportunities for transdisciplinary dialogue across legal, ethical, computer science, and interactive systems scholarship to translate matters of ethical concern into public policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-21T22:00:51Z)
• M2P2: Multimodal Persuasion Prediction using Adaptive Fusion [65.04045695380333]
  This paper solves two problems: the Debate Outcome Prediction (DOP) problem predicts who wins a debate and the Intensity of Persuasion Prediction (IPP) problem predicts the change in the number of votes before and after a speaker speaks. Our M2P2 framework is the first to use multimodal (acoustic, visual, language) data to solve the IPP problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T18:47:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.