Recognition of All Categories of Entities by AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.06590v2
• Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 01:17:06 GMT
• Title: Recognition of All Categories of Entities by AI
• Authors: Hiroshi Yamakawa and Yutaka Matsuo
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a new argumentative option to view the ontological sextet as a comprehensive technological map. We predict that in the relatively near future, AI will be able to recognize various entities to the same degree as humans.
• Score: 20.220102335024706
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human-level AI will have significant impacts on human society. However, estimates for the realization time are debatable. To arrive at human-level AI, artificial general intelligence (AGI), as opposed to AI systems that are specialized for a specific task, was set as a technically meaningful long-term goal. But now, propelled by advances in deep learning, that achievement is getting much closer. Considering the recent technological developments, it would be meaningful to discuss the completion date of human-level AI through the "comprehensive technology map approach," wherein we map human-level capabilities at a reasonable granularity, identify the current range of technology, and discuss the technical challenges in traversing unexplored areas and predict when all of them will be overcome. This paper presents a new argumentative option to view the ontological sextet, which encompasses entities in a way that is consistent with our everyday intuition and scientific practice, as a comprehensive technological map. Because most of the modeling of the world, in terms of how to interpret it, by an intelligent subject is the recognition of distal entities and the prediction of their temporal evolution, being able to handle all distal entities is a reasonable goal. Based on the findings of philosophy and engineering cognitive technology, we predict that in the relatively near future, AI will be able to recognize various entities to the same degree as humans.

Related papers

• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  Recent advances in AI have resulted in technology that can support humans in scientific discovery and decision support but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals. The responsible use of AI increasingly shows the need for human-AI teaming. A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
  We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom. While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems. We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z)
• A.I. go by many names: towards a sociotechnical definition of artificial intelligence [0.0]
  Defining artificial intelligence (AI) is a persistent challenge, often muddied by technical ambiguity and varying interpretations. This essay makes a case for a sociotechnical definition of AI, which is essential for researchers who require clarity in their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T11:25:50Z)
• Advancing Explainable AI Toward Human-Like Intelligence: Forging the Path to Artificial Brain [0.7770029179741429]
  The intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and neuroscience in Explainable AI (XAI) is pivotal for enhancing transparency and interpretability in complex decision-making processes. This paper explores the evolution of XAI methodologies, ranging from feature-based to human-centric approaches. The challenges in achieving explainability in generative models, ensuring responsible AI practices, and addressing ethical implications are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T14:09:11Z)
• AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
  Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species. Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Predicting the Future of AI with AI: High-quality link prediction in an exponentially growing knowledge network [15.626884746513712]
  We use AI techniques to predict the future research directions of AI itself. For that, we use more than 100,000 research papers and build up a knowledge network with more than 64,000 concept nodes. The most powerful methods use a carefully curated set of network features, rather than an end-to-end AI approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T14:04:37Z)
• On the Effect of Information Asymmetry in Human-AI Teams [0.0]
  We focus on the existence of complementarity potential between humans and AI. Specifically, we identify information asymmetry as an essential source of complementarity potential. By conducting an online experiment, we demonstrate that humans can use such contextual information to adjust the AI's decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T13:02:50Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Empowering Things with Intelligence: A Survey of the Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Artificial Intelligence of Things [98.10037444792444]
  We show how AI can empower the IoT to make it faster, smarter, greener, and safer. First, we present progress in AI research for IoT from four perspectives: perceiving, learning, reasoning, and behaving. Finally, we summarize some promising applications of AIoT that are likely to profoundly reshape our world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T13:14:28Z)
• Human Evaluation of Interpretability: The Case of AI-Generated Music Knowledge [19.508678969335882]
  We focus on evaluating AI-discovered knowledge/rules in the arts and humanities. We present an experimental procedure to collect and assess human-generated verbal interpretations of AI-generated music theory/rules rendered as sophisticated symbolic/numeric objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T06:03:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.