UKP-SQuARE v2 Explainability and Adversarial Attacks for Trustworthy QA

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09316v2
• Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:24:49 GMT
• Title: UKP-SQuARE v2 Explainability and Adversarial Attacks for Trustworthy QA
• Authors: Rachneet Sachdeva, Haritz Puerto, Tim Baumg\"artner, Sewin Tariverdian, Hao Zhang, Kexin Wang, Hossain Shaikh Saadi, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Iryna Gurevych
• Abstract summary: Question Answering systems are increasingly deployed in applications where they support real-world decisions. Inherently interpretable models or post hoc explainability methods can help users to comprehend how a model arrives at its prediction. We introduce SQuARE v2, the new version of SQuARE, to provide an explainability infrastructure for comparing models.
• Score: 47.8796570442486
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Question Answering (QA) systems are increasingly deployed in applications where they support real-world decisions. However, state-of-the-art models rely on deep neural networks, which are difficult to interpret by humans. Inherently interpretable models or post hoc explainability methods can help users to comprehend how a model arrives at its prediction and, if successful, increase their trust in the system. Furthermore, researchers can leverage these insights to develop new methods that are more accurate and less biased. In this paper, we introduce SQuARE v2, the new version of SQuARE, to provide an explainability infrastructure for comparing models based on methods such as saliency maps and graph-based explanations. While saliency maps are useful to inspect the importance of each input token for the model's prediction, graph-based explanations from external Knowledge Graphs enable the users to verify the reasoning behind the model prediction. In addition, we provide multiple adversarial attacks to compare the robustness of QA models. With these explainability methods and adversarial attacks, we aim to ease the research on trustworthy QA models. SQuARE is available on https://square.ukp-lab.de.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Calibrated Explanations for Regression [1.2058600649065616]
  Calibrated Explanations for regression provides fast, reliable, stable, and robust explanations. Calibrated Explanations for probabilistic regression provides an entirely new way of creating explanations. An implementation in Python is freely available on GitHub and for installation using both pip and conda.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T18:06:57Z)
• Evaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answering [26.34649731975005]
  Retriever-augmented instruction-following models are attractive alternatives to fine-tuned approaches for question answering (QA) While the model responses tend to be natural and fluent, the additional verbosity makes traditional QA evaluation metrics unreliable for accurately quantifying model performance. We use both automatic and human evaluation to evaluate these models along two dimensions: 1) how well they satisfy the user's information need (correctness) and 2) whether they produce a response based on the provided knowledge (faithfulness)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T17:41:00Z)
• Human Trajectory Forecasting with Explainable Behavioral Uncertainty [63.62824628085961]
  Human trajectory forecasting helps to understand and predict human behaviors, enabling applications from social robots to self-driving cars. Model-free methods offer superior prediction accuracy but lack explainability, while model-based methods provide explainability but cannot predict well. We show that BNSP-SFM achieves up to a 50% improvement in prediction accuracy, compared with 11 state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T16:45:21Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Dynamic Clue Bottlenecks: Towards Interpretable-by-Design Visual Question Answering [58.64831511644917]
  We introduce an interpretable by design model that factors model decisions into intermediate human-legible explanations. We show that our inherently interpretable system can improve 4.64% over a comparable black-box system in reasoning-focused questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:33:15Z)
• COCKATIEL: COntinuous Concept ranKed ATtribution with Interpretable ELements for explaining neural net classifiers on NLP tasks [3.475906200620518]
  COCKATIEL is a novel, post-hoc, concept-based, model-agnostic XAI technique. It generates meaningful explanations from the last layer of a neural net model trained on an NLP classification task. It does so without compromising the accuracy of the underlying model or requiring a new one to be trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T12:22:20Z)
• NxPlain: Web-based Tool for Discovery of Latent Concepts [16.446370662629555]
  We present NxPlain, a web application that provides an explanation of a model's prediction using latent concepts. NxPlain discovers latent concepts learned in a deep NLP model, provides an interpretation of the knowledge learned in the model, and explains its predictions based on the used concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T10:45:24Z)
• VisFIS: Visual Feature Importance Supervision with Right-for-the-Right-Reason Objectives [84.48039784446166]
  We show that model FI supervision can meaningfully improve VQA model accuracy as well as performance on several Right-for-the-Right-Reason metrics. Our best performing method, Visual Feature Importance Supervision (VisFIS), outperforms strong baselines on benchmark VQA datasets. Predictions are more accurate when explanations are plausible and faithful, and not when they are plausible but not faithful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T17:02:01Z)
• Unifying Model Explainability and Robustness via Machine-Checkable Concepts [33.88198813484126]
  We propose a robustness-assessment framework, at the core of which is the idea of using machine-checkable concepts. Our framework defines a large number of concepts that the explanations could be based on and performs the explanation-conformity check at test time to assess prediction robustness. Experiments on real-world datasets and human surveys show that our framework is able to enhance prediction robustness significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T05:21:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.