ProPaLL: Probabilistic Partial Label Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09931v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 17:47:44 GMT
• Title: ProPaLL: Probabilistic Partial Label Learning
• Authors: {\L}ukasz Struski, Jacek Tabor, Bartosz Zieli\'nski
• Abstract summary: Partial label learning is a type of weakly supervised learning, where each training instance corresponds to a set of candidate labels, among which only one is true. In this paper, we introduce ProPaLL, a novel probabilistic approach to this problem, which has at least three advantages compared to the existing approaches. Experiments conducted on artificial and real-world datasets indicate that ProPaLL outperforms the existing approaches.
• Score: 14.299728437638512
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Partial label learning is a type of weakly supervised learning, where each training instance corresponds to a set of candidate labels, among which only one is true. In this paper, we introduce ProPaLL, a novel probabilistic approach to this problem, which has at least three advantages compared to the existing approaches: it simplifies the training process, improves performance, and can be applied to any deep architecture. Experiments conducted on artificial and real-world datasets indicate that ProPaLL outperforms the existing approaches.

Related papers

• ProPML: Probability Partial Multi-label Learning [12.814910734614351]
  Partial Multi-label Learning (PML) is a type of weakly supervised learning where each training instance corresponds to a set of candidate labels, among which only some are true. In this paper, we introduce our, a novel probabilistic approach to this problem that extends the binary cross entropy to the PML setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T12:40:23Z)
• Joint empirical risk minimization for instance-dependent positive-unlabeled data [4.112909937203119]
  Learning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning) is actively researched machine learning task. The goal is to train a binary classification model based on a dataset containing part on positives which are labeled, and unlabeled instances. Unlabeled set includes remaining part positives and all negative observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T12:45:12Z)
• Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical [66.57396042747706]
  Complementary-label learning is a weakly supervised learning problem. We propose a consistent approach that does not rely on the uniform distribution assumption. We find that complementary-label learning can be expressed as a set of negative-unlabeled binary classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T02:59:17Z)
• Can Class-Priors Help Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning? [40.312419865957224]
  Single-positive multi-label learning (SPMLL) is a typical weakly supervised multi-label learning problem. Class-priors estimator is introduced, which could estimate the class-priors that are theoretically guaranteed to converge to the ground-truth class-priors. Based on the estimated class-priors, an unbiased risk estimator for classification is derived, and the corresponding risk minimizer could be guaranteed to approximately converge to the optimal risk minimizer on fully supervised data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T05:45:57Z)
• Robust Representation Learning for Unreliable Partial Label Learning [86.909511808373]
  Partial Label Learning (PLL) is a type of weakly supervised learning where each training instance is assigned a set of candidate labels, but only one label is the ground-truth. This is known as Unreliable Partial Label Learning (UPLL) that introduces an additional complexity due to the inherent unreliability and ambiguity of partial labels. We propose the Unreliability-Robust Representation Learning framework (URRL) that leverages unreliability-robust contrastive learning to help the model fortify against unreliable partial labels effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T13:37:28Z)
• One Positive Label is Sufficient: Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning with Label Enhancement [71.9401831465908]
  We investigate single-positive multi-label learning (SPMLL) where each example is annotated with only one relevant label. A novel method named proposed, i.e., Single-positive MultI-label learning with Label Enhancement, is proposed. Experiments on benchmark datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T14:26:30Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• An Effective Baseline for Robustness to Distributional Shift [5.627346969563955]
  Refraining from confidently predicting when faced with categories of inputs different from those seen during training is an important requirement for the safe deployment of deep learning systems. We present a simple, but highly effective approach to deal with out-of-distribution detection that uses the principle of abstention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-15T00:46:11Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Learning the Truth From Only One Side of the Story [58.65439277460011]
  We focus on generalized linear models and show that without adjusting for this sampling bias, the model may converge suboptimally or even fail to converge to the optimal solution. We propose an adaptive approach that comes with theoretical guarantees and show that it outperforms several existing methods empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T18:20:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.