Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.10244v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 08:49:32 GMT
• Title: Unit Testing for Concepts in Neural Networks
• Authors: Charles Lovering and Ellie Pavlick
• Abstract summary: We propose unit tests for evaluating whether a system's behavior is consistent with Fodor's criteria. We find that models succeed on tests of groundedness, modularlity, and reusability of concepts, but that important questions about causality remain open.
• Score: 20.86261546611472
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many complex problems are naturally understood in terms of symbolic concepts. For example, our concept of "cat" is related to our concepts of "ears" and "whiskers" in a non-arbitrary way. Fodor (1998) proposes one theory of concepts, which emphasizes symbolic representations related via constituency structures. Whether neural networks are consistent with such a theory is open for debate. We propose unit tests for evaluating whether a system's behavior is consistent with several key aspects of Fodor's criteria. Using a simple visual concept learning task, we evaluate several modern neural architectures against this specification. We find that models succeed on tests of groundedness, modularlity, and reusability of concepts, but that important questions about causality remain open. Resolving these will require new methods for analyzing models' internal states.

Related papers

• LLM-assisted Concept Discovery: Automatically Identifying and Explaining Neuron Functions [15.381209058506078]
  Prior works have associated concepts with neurons based on examples of concepts or a pre-defined set of concepts. We propose to leverage multimodal large language models for automatic and open-ended concept discovery. We validate each concept by generating examples and counterexamples and evaluating the neuron's response on this new set of images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T18:19:37Z)
• Conceptual and Unbiased Reasoning in Language Models [98.90677711523645]
  We propose a novel conceptualization framework that forces models to perform conceptual reasoning on abstract questions. We show that existing large language models fall short on conceptual reasoning, dropping 9% to 28% on various benchmarks. We then discuss how models can improve since high-level abstract reasoning is key to unbiased and generalizable decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T00:53:53Z)
• A survey on Concept-based Approaches For Model Improvement [2.1516043775965565]
  Concepts are known to be the thinking ground of humans. We provide a systematic review and taxonomy of various concept representations and their discovery algorithms in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) We also provide details on concept-based model improvement literature marking the first comprehensive survey of these methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T17:09:20Z)
• A Recursive Bateson-Inspired Model for the Generation of Semantic Formal Concepts from Spatial Sensory Data [77.34726150561087]
  This paper presents a new symbolic-only method for the generation of hierarchical concept structures from complex sensory data. The approach is based on Bateson's notion of difference as the key to the genesis of an idea or a concept. The model is able to produce fairly rich yet human-readable conceptual representations without training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:59:13Z)
• Succinct Representations for Concepts [12.134564449202708]
  Foundation models like chatGPT have demonstrated remarkable performance on various tasks. However, for many questions, they may produce false answers that look accurate. In this paper, we introduce succinct representations of concepts based on category theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T12:11:23Z)
• Human-Centered Concept Explanations for Neural Networks [47.71169918421306]
  We introduce concept explanations including the class of Concept Activation Vectors (CAV) We then discuss approaches to automatically extract concepts, and approaches to address some of their caveats. Finally, we discuss some case studies that showcase the utility of such concept-based explanations in synthetic settings and real world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T01:27:31Z)
• Separating Skills and Concepts for Novel Visual Question Answering [66.46070380927372]
  Generalization to out-of-distribution data has been a problem for Visual Question Answering (VQA) models. "Skills" are visual tasks, such as counting or attribute recognition, and are applied to "concepts" mentioned in the question. We present a novel method for learning to compose skills and concepts that separates these two factors implicitly within a model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T18:55:10Z)
• Cause and Effect: Concept-based Explanation of Neural Networks [3.883460584034766]
  We take a step in the interpretability of neural networks by examining their internal representation or neuron's activations against concepts. We propose a framework to check the existence of a causal relationship between a concept (or its negation) and task classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-14T18:54:17Z)
• Developing Constrained Neural Units Over Time [81.19349325749037]
  This paper focuses on an alternative way of defining Neural Networks, that is different from the majority of existing approaches. The structure of the neural architecture is defined by means of a special class of constraints that are extended also to the interaction with data. The proposed theory is cast into the time domain, in which data are presented to the network in an ordered manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T09:07:25Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Visual Reasoning: Disentangling "Visual" from "Reasoning" [49.76230210108583]
  We propose a framework to isolate and evaluate the reasoning aspect of visual question answering (VQA) separately from its perception. We also propose a novel top-down calibration technique that allows the model to answer reasoning questions even with imperfect perception. On the challenging GQA dataset, this framework is used to perform in-depth, disentangled comparisons between well-known VQA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-20T08:48:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.