Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04329v4
• Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 14:10:02 GMT
• Title: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization
• Authors: Phillip Heiler
• Abstract summary: We propose a method for estimation and inference for bounds for heterogeneous causal effect parameters. The method provides conditional effect bounds as functions of policy relevant pre-treatment variables. We use a flexible debiased/double machine learning approach that can accommodate non-linear functional forms and high-dimensional confounders.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a method for estimation and inference for bounds for heterogeneous causal effect parameters in general sample selection models where the treatment can affect whether an outcome is observed and no exclusion restrictions are available. The method provides conditional effect bounds as functions of policy relevant pre-treatment variables. It allows for conducting valid statistical inference on the unidentified conditional effects. We use a flexible debiased/double machine learning approach that can accommodate non-linear functional forms and high-dimensional confounders. Easily verifiable high-level conditions for estimation, misspecification robust confidence intervals, and uniform confidence bands are provided as well. We re-analyze data from a large scale field experiment on Facebook on counter-attitudinal news subscription with attrition. Our method yields substantially tighter effect bounds compared to conventional methods and suggests depolarization effects for younger users.

Related papers

• Conditionally valid Probabilistic Conformal Prediction [57.80927226809277]
  We develop a new method for creating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through extensive simulations, showing that it outperforms existing methods in terms of conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z)
• Estimating Dyadic Treatment Effects with Unknown Confounders [0.0]
  We propose a statistical inference method for assessing treatment effects with dyadic data. Under the assumption that the treatments follow an exchangeable distribution, our approach allows for the presence of unobserved confounding factors. We apply our method to international trade data to assess the impact of free trade agreements on bilateral trade flows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T12:32:14Z)
• Perturbation-based Effect Measures for Compositional Data [3.9543275888781224]
  Existing effect measures for compositional features are inadequate for many modern applications. We propose a framework based on hypothetical data perturbations that addresses both issues. We show how average perturbation effects can be estimated efficiently by deriving a perturbation-dependent reparametrization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T12:27:15Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Data-Driven Influence Functions for Optimization-Based Causal Inference [105.5385525290466]
  We study a constructive algorithm that approximates Gateaux derivatives for statistical functionals by finite differencing. We study the case where probability distributions are not known a priori but need to be estimated from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T16:16:22Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• A Class of Algorithms for General Instrumental Variable Models [29.558215059892206]
  Causal treatment effect estimation is a key problem that arises in a variety of real-world settings. We provide a method for causal effect bounding in continuous distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T12:32:24Z)
• Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effects [6.810856082577402]
  We propose a conformal inference-based approach that can produce reliable interval estimates for counterfactuals and individual treatment effects. Existing methods suffer from a significant coverage deficit even in simple models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T01:03:32Z)
• Nonparametric inference for interventional effects with multiple mediators [0.0]
  We provide theory that allows for more flexible, possibly machine learning-based, estimation techniques. We demonstrate multiple robustness properties of the proposed estimators. Our work thus provides a means of leveraging modern statistical learning techniques in estimation of interventional mediation effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-16T19:05:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.