Quantifying the Online Long-Term Interest in Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06212v1
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:57:44 GMT
- Title: Quantifying the Online Long-Term Interest in Research
- Authors: Murtuza Shahzad, Hamed Alhoori, Reva Freedman, Shaikh Abdul Rahman
- Abstract summary: Being cognizant of how long a research article is mentioned online could be valuable information to the researchers.
We analyzed multiple social media platforms on which users share and/or discuss scholarly articles.
Using the online social media metrics for each of these three clusters, we built machine learning models to predict the long-term online interest in research articles.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Research articles are being shared in increasing numbers on multiple online
platforms. Although the scholarly impact of these articles has been widely
studied, the online interest determined by how long the research articles are
shared online remains unclear. Being cognizant of how long a research article
is mentioned online could be valuable information to the researchers. In this
paper, we analyzed multiple social media platforms on which users share and/or
discuss scholarly articles. We built three clusters for papers, based on the
number of yearly online mentions having publication dates ranging from the year
1920 to 2016. Using the online social media metrics for each of these three
clusters, we built machine learning models to predict the long-term online
interest in research articles. We addressed the prediction task with two
different approaches: regression and classification. For the regression
approach, the Multi-Layer Perceptron model performed best, and for the
classification approach, the tree-based models performed better than other
models. We found that old articles are most evident in the contexts of
economics and industry (i.e., patents). In contrast, recently published
articles are most evident in research platforms (i.e., Mendeley) followed by
social media platforms (i.e., Twitter).
Related papers
- SMP Challenge: An Overview and Analysis of Social Media Prediction Challenge [63.311045291016555]
Social Media Popularity Prediction (SMPP) is a crucial task that involves automatically predicting future popularity values of online posts.
This paper summarizes the challenging task, data, and research progress.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T02:36:14Z) - Continual Learning with Pre-Trained Models: A Survey [61.97613090666247]
Continual Learning aims to overcome the catastrophic forgetting of former knowledge when learning new ones.
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the latest advancements in PTM-based CL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T18:27:52Z) - UKP-SQuARE v3: A Platform for Multi-Agent QA Research [48.92308487624824]
We extend UKP-SQuARE, an online platform for Question Answering (QA) research, to support three families of multi-agent systems.
We conduct experiments to evaluate their inference speed and discuss the performance vs. speed trade-off compared to multi-dataset models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T15:07:36Z) - Analyzing the State of Computer Science Research with the DBLP Discovery
Dataset [0.0]
We conduct a scientometric analysis to uncover the implicit patterns hidden in CS metadata.
We introduce the CS-Insights system, an interactive web application to analyze CS publications with various dashboards, filters, and visualizations.
Both D3 and CS-Insights are open-access, and CS-Insights can be easily adapted to other datasets in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-01T16:27:42Z) - Early Indicators of Scientific Impact: Predicting Citations with
Altmetrics [0.0]
We use altmetrics to predict the short-term and long-term citations that a scholarly publication could receive.
We build various classification and regression models and evaluate their performance, finding neural networks and ensemble models to perform best for these tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-25T16:25:07Z) - What's New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature [85.95906677964815]
We introduce a new task of disentangled paper summarization, which seeks to generate separate summaries for the paper contributions and the context of the work.
We extend the S2ORC corpus of academic articles by adding disentangled "contribution" and "context" reference labels.
We propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation protocol which reports the relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-06T02:23:01Z) - Stance Detection in Web and Social Media: A Comparative Study [3.937145867005019]
Online forums and social media platforms are increasingly being used to discuss topics of varying polarities where different people take different stances.
Several methodologies for automatic stance detection from text have been proposed in literature.
To our knowledge, there has not been any systematic investigation towards their, and their comparative performances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-12T12:39:35Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z) - How do academic topics shift across altmetric sources? A case study of
the research area of Big Data [2.208242292882514]
Author keywords from publications and terms from online events are extracted as the main topics of the publications and the online discussion of their audiences at Altmetric.
Results show there are substantial differences between the two sets of topics around Big Data scientific research.
Blogs and News show a strong similarity in the terms commonly used, while Policy documents and Wikipedia articles exhibit the strongest dissimilarity in considering and interpreting Big Data related research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-23T19:37:36Z) - Applications of deep learning in stock market prediction: recent
progress [5.780772209241294]
This survey is to give a latest review of recent works on deep learning models for stock market prediction.
We not only category the different data sources, various neural network structures, and common used metrics, but also the implementation and evaluation.
Our goal is to help the interested researchers to synchronize with the latest progress and also help them to easily reproduce the previous studies as baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-29T03:37:34Z) - I Know Where You Are Coming From: On the Impact of Social Media Sources
on AI Model Performance [79.05613148641018]
We will study the performance of different machine learning models when being learned on multi-modal data from different social networks.
Our initial experimental results reveal that social network choice impacts the performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T11:10:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.