Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10015v1
• Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:52:39 GMT
• Title: Metadata Archaeology: Unearthing Data Subsets by Leveraging Training Dynamics
• Authors: Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Tegan Maharaj, David Krueger, Sara Hooker
• Abstract summary: We focus on providing a unified and efficient framework for Metadata Archaeology. We curate different subsets of data that might exist in a dataset. We leverage differences in learning dynamics between these probe suites to infer metadata of interest.
• Score: 3.9627732117855414
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern machine learning research relies on relatively few carefully curated datasets. Even in these datasets, and typically in `untidy' or raw data, practitioners are faced with significant issues of data quality and diversity which can be prohibitively labor intensive to address. Existing methods for dealing with these challenges tend to make strong assumptions about the particular issues at play, and often require a priori knowledge or metadata such as domain labels. Our work is orthogonal to these methods: we instead focus on providing a unified and efficient framework for Metadata Archaeology -- uncovering and inferring metadata of examples in a dataset. We curate different subsets of data that might exist in a dataset (e.g. mislabeled, atypical, or out-of-distribution examples) using simple transformations, and leverage differences in learning dynamics between these probe suites to infer metadata of interest. Our method is on par with far more sophisticated mitigation methods across different tasks: identifying and correcting mislabeled examples, classifying minority-group samples, prioritizing points relevant for training and enabling scalable human auditing of relevant examples.

Related papers

• Approaching Metaheuristic Deep Learning Combos for Automated Data Mining [0.5419570023862531]
  This work proposes a means of combining meta-heuristic methods with conventional classifiers and neural networks in order to perform automated data mining. Experiments on the MNIST dataset for handwritten digit recognition were performed. It was empirically observed that using a ground truth labeled dataset's validation accuracy is inadequate for correcting labels of other previously unseen data instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T10:28:22Z)
• Improve Meta-learning for Few-Shot Text Classification with All You Can Acquire from the Tasks [10.556477506959888]
  Existing methods often encounter difficulties in drawing accurate class prototypes from support set samples. Recent approaches attempt to incorporate external knowledge or pre-trained language models to augment data, but this requires additional resources. We propose a novel solution by adequately leveraging the information within the task itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T12:47:11Z)
• What is different between these datasets? [23.271594219577185]
  Two comparable datasets in the same domain may have different distributions. We propose a suite of interpretable methods (toolbox) for comparing two datasets. Our methods not only outperform comparable and related approaches in terms of explanation quality and correctness, but also provide actionable, complementary insights to understand and mitigate dataset differences effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T19:52:39Z)
• Binary Quantification and Dataset Shift: An Experimental Investigation [54.14283123210872]
  Quantification is the supervised learning task that consists of training predictors of the class prevalence values of sets of unlabelled data. The relationship between quantification and other types of dataset shift remains, by and large, unexplored. We propose a fine-grained taxonomy of types of dataset shift, by establishing protocols for the generation of datasets affected by these types of shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T20:11:27Z)
• Tackling Diverse Minorities in Imbalanced Classification [80.78227787608714]
  Imbalanced datasets are commonly observed in various real-world applications, presenting significant challenges in training classifiers. We propose generating synthetic samples iteratively by mixing data samples from both minority and majority classes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through extensive experiments conducted on seven publicly available benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:48:34Z)
• BAMLD: Bayesian Active Meta-Learning by Disagreement [39.59987601426039]
  This paper introduces an information-theoretic active task selection mechanism to decrease the number of labeling requests for meta-training tasks. We report its empirical performance results that compare favourably against existing acquisition mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T13:06:51Z)
• Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts [62.63504976810927]
  We propose methods to facilitate identification of training data artifacts. We show that this proposed training-feature attribution approach can be used to uncover artifacts in training data. We execute a small user study to evaluate whether these methods are useful to NLP researchers in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T09:26:13Z)
• Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language Data [50.09608320112584]
  We argue that for complex language understanding tasks, all simple feature correlations are spurious. We theoretically analyze the difficulty of creating data for competency problems when human bias is taken into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T21:34:10Z)
• Simple multi-dataset detection [83.9604523643406]
  We present a simple method for training a unified detector on multiple large-scale datasets. We show how to automatically integrate dataset-specific outputs into a common semantic taxonomy. Our approach does not require manual taxonomy reconciliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T18:55:58Z)
• On Cross-Dataset Generalization in Automatic Detection of Online Abuse [7.163723138100273]
  We show that the benign examples in the Wikipedia Detox dataset are biased towards platform-specific topics. We identify these examples using unsupervised topic modeling and manual inspection of topics' keywords. For a robust dataset design, we suggest applying inexpensive unsupervised methods to inspect the collected data and downsize the non-generalizable content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T21:47:03Z)
• Adversarial Knowledge Transfer from Unlabeled Data [62.97253639100014]
  We present a novel Adversarial Knowledge Transfer framework for transferring knowledge from internet-scale unlabeled data to improve the performance of a classifier. An important novel aspect of our method is that the unlabeled source data can be of different classes from those of the labeled target data, and there is no need to define a separate pretext task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-13T08:04:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.