Fast online ranking with fairness of exposure

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13019v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:35:36 GMT
• Title: Fast online ranking with fairness of exposure
• Authors: Nicolas Usunier, Virginie Do, Elvis Dohmatob
• Abstract summary: We show that our algorithm is computationally fast, generating rankings on-the-fly with computation cost dominated by the sort operation, memory efficient, and has strong theoretical guarantees. Compared to baseline policies that only maximize user-side performance, our algorithm allows to incorporate complex fairness of exposure criteria in the recommendations with negligible computational overhead.
• Score: 29.134493256287072
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As recommender systems become increasingly central for sorting and prioritizing the content available online, they have a growing impact on the opportunities or revenue of their items producers. For instance, they influence which recruiter a resume is recommended to, or to whom and how much a music track, video or news article is being exposed. This calls for recommendation approaches that not only maximize (a proxy of) user satisfaction, but also consider some notion of fairness in the exposure of items or groups of items. Formally, such recommendations are usually obtained by maximizing a concave objective function in the space of randomized rankings. When the total exposure of an item is defined as the sum of its exposure over users, the optimal rankings of every users become coupled, which makes the optimization process challenging. Existing approaches to find these rankings either solve the global optimization problem in a batch setting, i.e., for all users at once, which makes them inapplicable at scale, or are based on heuristics that have weak theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we propose the first efficient online algorithm to optimize concave objective functions in the space of rankings which applies to every concave and smooth objective function, such as the ones found for fairness of exposure. Based on online variants of the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, we show that our algorithm is computationally fast, generating rankings on-the-fly with computation cost dominated by the sort operation, memory efficient, and has strong theoretical guarantees. Compared to baseline policies that only maximize user-side performance, our algorithm allows to incorporate complex fairness of exposure criteria in the recommendations with negligible computational overhead.

Related papers

• Adaptively Learning to Select-Rank in Online Platforms [34.258659206323664]
  This research addresses the challenge of adaptively ranking items from a candidate pool for heterogeneous users. We develop a user response model that considers diverse user preferences and the varying effects of item positions. Experiments conducted on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate our algorithm outperforms the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T15:33:48Z)
• Localized Zeroth-Order Prompt Optimization [54.964765668688806]
  We propose a novel algorithm, namely localized zeroth-order prompt optimization (ZOPO) ZOPO incorporates a Neural Tangent Kernel-based derived Gaussian process into standard zeroth-order optimization for an efficient search of well-performing local optima in prompt optimization. Remarkably, ZOPO outperforms existing baselines in terms of both the optimization performance and the query efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T14:18:15Z)
• Adaptive Neural Ranking Framework: Toward Maximized Business Goal for Cascade Ranking Systems [33.46891569350896]
  Cascade ranking is widely used for large-scale top-k selection problems in online advertising and recommendation systems. Previous works on learning-to-rank usually focus on letting the model learn the complete order or top-k order. We name this method as Adaptive Neural Ranking Framework (abbreviated as ARF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:43:02Z)
• Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustment [54.179859639868646]
  We propose a model agnostic post-processing framework xOrder for achieving fairness in bipartite ranking. xOrder is compatible with various classification models and ranking fairness metrics, including supervised and unsupervised fairness metrics. We evaluate our proposed algorithm on four benchmark data sets and two real-world patient electronic health record repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T07:42:44Z)
• Optimizing Partial Area Under the Top-k Curve: Theory and Practice [151.5072746015253]
  We develop a novel metric named partial Area Under the top-k Curve (AUTKC) AUTKC has a better discrimination ability, and its Bayes optimal score function could give a correct top-K ranking with respect to the conditional probability. We present an empirical surrogate risk minimization framework to optimize the proposed metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-03T11:09:13Z)
• Pessimistic Off-Policy Optimization for Learning to Rank [13.733459243449634]
  Off-policy learning is a framework for optimizing policies without deploying them. In recommender systems, this is especially challenging due to the imbalance in logged data. We study pessimistic off-policy optimization for learning to rank.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T12:58:28Z)
• Sequential Information Design: Markov Persuasion Process and Its Efficient Reinforcement Learning [156.5667417159582]
  This paper proposes a novel model of sequential information design, namely the Markov persuasion processes (MPPs) Planning in MPPs faces the unique challenge in finding a signaling policy that is simultaneously persuasive to the myopic receivers and inducing the optimal long-term cumulative utilities of the sender. We design a provably efficient no-regret learning algorithm, the Optimism-Pessimism Principle for Persuasion Process (OP4), which features a novel combination of both optimism and pessimism principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T05:41:43Z)
• User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Markets [28.537935838669423]
  We show that user fairness, item fairness and diversity are fundamentally different concepts. We present the first ranking algorithm that explicitly enforces all three desiderata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T02:53:09Z)
• Exploration in two-stage recommender systems [79.50534282841618]
  Two-stage recommender systems are widely adopted in industry due to their scalability and maintainability. A key challenge of this setup is that optimal performance of each stage in isolation does not imply optimal global performance. We propose a method of synchronising the exploration strategies between the ranker and the nominators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T16:52:51Z)
• Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rank [31.41843594914603]
  We propose a learning algorithm that ensures notions of amortized group fairness, while simultaneously learning the ranking function from implicit feedback data. The algorithm takes the form of a controller that integrates unbiased estimators for both fairness and utility. In addition to its rigorous theoretical foundation and convergence guarantees, we find empirically that the algorithm is highly practical and robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T17:57:56Z)
• SetRank: A Setwise Bayesian Approach for Collaborative Ranking from Implicit Feedback [50.13745601531148]
  We propose a novel setwise Bayesian approach for collaborative ranking, namely SetRank, to accommodate the characteristics of implicit feedback in recommender system. Specifically, SetRank aims at maximizing the posterior probability of novel setwise preference comparisons. We also present the theoretical analysis of SetRank to show that the bound of excess risk can be proportional to $sqrtM/N$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T06:40:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.