Voice Spoofing Countermeasures: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, experimental analysis of generalizability, open challenges, and the way forward

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00417v2
• Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 19:29:07 GMT
• Title: Voice Spoofing Countermeasures: Taxonomy, State-of-the-art, experimental analysis of generalizability, open challenges, and the way forward
• Authors: Awais Khan, Khalid Mahmood Malik, James Ryan, and Mikul Saravanan
• Abstract summary: We conduct a review of the literature on spoofing detection using hand-crafted features, deep learning, end-to-end, and universal spoofing countermeasure solutions. We report the performance of these countermeasures on several datasets and evaluate them across corpora.
• Score: 2.393661358372807
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Malicious actors may seek to use different voice-spoofing attacks to fool ASV systems and even use them for spreading misinformation. Various countermeasures have been proposed to detect these spoofing attacks. Due to the extensive work done on spoofing detection in automated speaker verification (ASV) systems in the last 6-7 years, there is a need to classify the research and perform qualitative and quantitative comparisons on state-of-the-art countermeasures. Additionally, no existing survey paper has reviewed integrated solutions to voice spoofing evaluation and speaker verification, adversarial/antiforensics attacks on spoofing countermeasures, and ASV itself, or unified solutions to detect multiple attacks using a single model. Further, no work has been done to provide an apples-to-apples comparison of published countermeasures in order to assess their generalizability by evaluating them across corpora. In this work, we conduct a review of the literature on spoofing detection using hand-crafted features, deep learning, end-to-end, and universal spoofing countermeasure solutions to detect speech synthesis (SS), voice conversion (VC), and replay attacks. Additionally, we also review integrated solutions to voice spoofing evaluation and speaker verification, adversarial and anti-forensics attacks on voice countermeasures, and ASV. The limitations and challenges of the existing spoofing countermeasures are also presented. We report the performance of these countermeasures on several datasets and evaluate them across corpora. For the experiments, we employ the ASVspoof2019 and VSDC datasets along with GMM, SVM, CNN, and CNN-GRU classifiers. (For reproduceability of the results, the code of the test bed can be found in our GitHub Repository.

Related papers

• Toward Improving Synthetic Audio Spoofing Detection Robustness via Meta-Learning and Disentangled Training With Adversarial Examples [33.445126880876415]
  We propose a reliable and robust spoofing detection system to filter out spoofing attacks instead of having them reach the automatic speaker verification system. A weighted additive angular margin loss is proposed to address the data imbalance issue, and different margins has been assigned to improve generalization to unseen spoofing attacks. We craft adversarial examples by adding imperceptible perturbations to spoofing speech as a data augmentation strategy, then we use an auxiliary batch normalization to guarantee that corresponding normalization statistics are performed exclusively on the adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T19:26:54Z)
• ASVspoof 5: Crowdsourced Speech Data, Deepfakes, and Adversarial Attacks at Scale [59.25180900687571]
  ASVspoof 5 is the fifth edition in a series of challenges that promote the study of speech spoofing and deepfake attacks. We describe the two challenge tracks, the new database, the evaluation metrics, and the evaluation platform, and present a summary of the results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T13:37:20Z)
• Defense of Adversarial Ranking Attack in Text Retrieval: Benchmark and Baseline via Detection [12.244543468021938]
  This paper introduces two types of detection tasks for adversarial documents. A benchmark dataset is established to facilitate the investigation of adversarial ranking defense. A comprehensive investigation of the performance of several detection baselines is conducted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T16:31:24Z)
• Spotting adversarial samples for speaker verification by neural vocoders [102.1486475058963]
  We adopt neural vocoders to spot adversarial samples for automatic speaker verification (ASV) We find that the difference between the ASV scores for the original and re-synthesize audio is a good indicator for discrimination between genuine and adversarial samples. Our codes will be made open-source for future works to do comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T08:58:16Z)
• Voting for the right answer: Adversarial defense for speaker verification [79.10523688806852]
  ASV is under the radar of adversarial attacks, which are similar to their original counterparts from human's perception. We propose the idea of "voting for the right answer" to prevent risky decisions of ASV in blind spot areas. Experimental results show that our proposed method improves the robustness against both the limited-knowledge attackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T04:05:28Z)
• Improving the Adversarial Robustness for Speaker Verification by Self-Supervised Learning [95.60856995067083]
  This work is among the first to perform adversarial defense for ASV without knowing the specific attack algorithms. We propose to perform adversarial defense from two perspectives: 1) adversarial perturbation purification and 2) adversarial perturbation detection. Experimental results show that our detection module effectively shields the ASV by detecting adversarial samples with an accuracy of around 80%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T07:10:54Z)
• Investigating Robustness of Adversarial Samples Detection for Automatic Speaker Verification [78.51092318750102]
  This work proposes to defend ASV systems against adversarial attacks with a separate detection network. A VGG-like binary classification detector is introduced and demonstrated to be effective on detecting adversarial samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T04:31:56Z)
• Defense against adversarial attacks on spoofing countermeasures of ASV [95.87555881176529]
  This paper introduces a passive defense method, spatial smoothing, and a proactive defense method, adversarial training, to mitigate the vulnerability of ASV spoofing countermeasure models. The experimental results show that these two defense methods positively help spoofing countermeasure models counter adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-06T08:08:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.