Legal Element-oriented Modeling with Multi-view Contrastive Learning for
Legal Case Retrieval
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05188v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:47:23 GMT
- Title: Legal Element-oriented Modeling with Multi-view Contrastive Learning for
Legal Case Retrieval
- Authors: Zhaowei Wang
- Abstract summary: We propose an interaction-focused network for legal case retrieval with a multi-view contrastive learning objective.
Case-view contrastive learning minimizes the hidden space distance between relevant legal case representations.
We employ a legal element knowledge-aware indicator to detect legal elements of cases.
- Score: 3.909749182759558
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Legal case retrieval, which aims to retrieve relevant cases given a query
case, plays an essential role in the legal system. While recent research
efforts improve the performance of traditional ad-hoc retrieval models, legal
case retrieval is still challenging since queries are legal cases, which
contain hundreds of tokens. Legal cases are much longer and more complicated
than keywords queries. Apart from that, the definition of legal relevance is
beyond the general definition. In addition to general topical relevance, the
relevant cases also involve similar situations and legal elements, which can
support the judgment of the current case. In this paper, we propose an
interaction-focused network for legal case retrieval with a multi-view
contrastive learning objective. The contrastive learning views, including
case-view and element-view, aim to overcome the above challenges. The case-view
contrastive learning minimizes the hidden space distance between relevant legal
case representations produced by a pre-trained language model (PLM) encoder.
The element-view builds positive and negative instances by changing legal
elements of cases to help the network better compute legal relevance. To
achieve this, we employ a legal element knowledge-aware indicator to detect
legal elements of cases. We conduct extensive experiments on the benchmark of
relevant case retrieval. Evaluation results indicate our proposed method
obtains significant improvement over the existing methods.
Related papers
- LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System [43.13850456765944]
We introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-task model specifically designed for the US legal domain.
LawLLM excels at Similar Case Retrieval (SCR), Precedent Case Recommendation (PCR), and Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP)
We propose customized data preprocessing techniques for each task that transform raw legal data into a trainable format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-27T21:51:30Z) - Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case Reformulation [22.85652668826498]
This paper introduces KELLER, a legal knowledge-guided case reformulation approach based on large language models (LLMs)
By incorporating professional legal knowledge about crimes and law articles, we enable large language models to accurately reformulate the original legal case into concise sub-facts of crimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T08:59:45Z) - DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval.
We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability.
Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z) - MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset [65.36779942237357]
Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness.
Existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the similarity between cases.
We present M, a similar case retrieval dataset based on multi-view similarity measurement and comprehensive legal element with sentence-level legal element annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T08:17:11Z) - An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrieval [43.22489520922202]
Legal case retrieval is a special Information Retrieval(IR) task focusing on legal case documents.
We present a novel hierarchical intent taxonomy of legal case retrieval.
We reveal significant differences in user behavior and satisfaction under different search intents in legal case retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T07:27:32Z) - SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case
Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system.
Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures.
We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z) - Exploiting Contrastive Learning and Numerical Evidence for Confusing
Legal Judgment Prediction [46.71918729837462]
Given the fact description text of a legal case, legal judgment prediction aims to predict the case's charge, law article and penalty term.
Previous studies fail to distinguish different classification errors with a standard cross-entropy classification loss.
We propose a moco-based supervised contrastive learning to learn distinguishable representations.
We further enhance the representation of the fact description with extracted crime amounts which are encoded by a pre-trained numeracy model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T15:53:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.