Addressing contingency in algorithmic (mis)information classification: Toward a responsible machine learning agenda

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09014v2
• Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:07:26 GMT
• Title: Addressing contingency in algorithmic (mis)information classification: Toward a responsible machine learning agenda
• Authors: Andr\'es Dom\'inguez Hern\'andez, Richard Owen, Dan Saattrup Nielsen, Ryan McConville
• Abstract summary: Data scientists need to take a stance on the objectivity, authoritativeness and legitimacy of the sources of truth" used for model training and testing. Despite (and due to) their reported high accuracy and performance, ML-driven moderation systems have the potential to shape online public debate and create downstream negative impacts such as undue censorship and the reinforcing of false beliefs.
• Score: 0.9659642285903421
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning (ML) enabled classification models are becoming increasingly popular for tackling the sheer volume and speed of online misinformation and other content that could be identified as harmful. In building these models, data scientists need to take a stance on the legitimacy, authoritativeness and objectivity of the sources of ``truth" used for model training and testing. This has political, ethical and epistemic implications which are rarely addressed in technical papers. Despite (and due to) their reported high accuracy and performance, ML-driven moderation systems have the potential to shape online public debate and create downstream negative impacts such as undue censorship and the reinforcing of false beliefs. Using collaborative ethnography and theoretical insights from social studies of science and expertise, we offer a critical analysis of the process of building ML models for (mis)information classification: we identify a series of algorithmic contingencies--key moments during model development that could lead to different future outcomes, uncertainty and harmful effects as these tools are deployed by social media platforms. We conclude by offering a tentative path toward reflexive and responsible development of ML tools for moderating misinformation and other harmful content online.

Related papers

• RESTOR: Knowledge Recovery through Machine Unlearning [71.75834077528305]
  Large language models trained on web-scale corpora can memorize undesirable datapoints. Many machine unlearning methods have been proposed that aim to 'erase' these datapoints from trained models. We propose the RESTOR framework for machine unlearning based on the following dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T20:54:35Z)
• Navigating Uncertainties in Machine Learning for Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review of Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Approaches in Forward and Inverse Problems [0.0]
  This paper presents a comprehensive review on navigating uncertainties in machine learning (ML) It lists uncertainty-aware approaches into probabilistic methods and non-probabilistic methods. The review aims to assist researchers and practitioners in making informed decisions when utilizing ML techniques to address uncertainties in structural dynamic problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T09:43:01Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
  We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs) This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z)
• Exploring the Landscape of Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy [17.535417441295074]
  Machine unlearning (MU) is gaining increasing attention due to the need to remove or modify predictions made by machine learning (ML) models. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of MU, covering current state-of-the-art techniques and approaches. The paper also highlights the challenges that need to be addressed, including attack sophistication, standardization, transferability, interpretability, and resource constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T12:02:18Z)
• A Survey of Machine Unlearning [56.017968863854186]
  Recent regulations now require that, on request, private information about a user must be removed from computer systems. ML models often remember' the old data. Recent works on machine unlearning have not been able to completely solve the problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T08:51:53Z)
• Poisoning Attacks and Defenses on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey [3.706481388415728]
  Data poisoning attacks represent a type of attack that consists of tampering the data samples fed to the model during the training phase, leading to a degradation in the models accuracy during the inference phase. This work compiles the most relevant insights and findings found in the latest existing literatures addressing this type of attacks. A thorough assessment is performed on the reviewed works, comparing the effects of data poisoning on a wide range of ML models in real-world conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T14:43:38Z)
• Towards Model-informed Precision Dosing with Expert-in-the-loop Machine Learning [0.0]
  We consider a ML framework that may accelerate model learning and improve its interpretability by incorporating human experts into the model learning loop. We propose a novel human-in-the-loop ML framework aimed at dealing with learning problems that the cost of data annotation is high. With an application to precision dosing, our experimental results show that the approach can learn interpretable rules from data and may potentially lower experts' workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-28T03:45:09Z)
• Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitioners [69.02688684221265]
  The use of sophisticated statistical models that influence decisions in domains of high societal relevance is on the rise. Many governments, institutions, and companies are reluctant to their adoption as their output is often difficult to explain in human-interpretable ways. Recently, the academic literature has proposed a substantial amount of methods for providing interpretable explanations to machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T01:46:34Z)
• ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Models [64.03398193325572]
  Inference attacks against Machine Learning (ML) models allow adversaries to learn about training data, model parameters, etc. We concentrate on four attacks - namely, membership inference, model inversion, attribute inference, and model stealing. Our analysis relies on a modular re-usable software, ML-Doctor, which enables ML model owners to assess the risks of deploying their models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T11:35:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.