Controller-Guided Partial Label Consistency Regularization with Unlabeled Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11194v4
• Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:51:07 GMT
• Title: Controller-Guided Partial Label Consistency Regularization with Unlabeled Data
• Authors: Qian-Wei Wang, Bowen Zhao, Mingyan Zhu, Tianxiang Li, Zimo Liu, Shu-Tao Xia
• Abstract summary: We propose a controller-guided consistency regularization at both the label-level and representation-level. We dynamically adjust the confidence thresholds so that the number of samples of each class participating in consistency regularization remains roughly equal to alleviate the problem of class-imbalance.
• Score: 49.24911720809604
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Partial label learning (PLL) learns from training examples each associated with multiple candidate labels, among which only one is valid. In recent years, benefiting from the strong capability of dealing with ambiguous supervision and the impetus of modern data augmentation methods, consistency regularization-based PLL methods have achieved a series of successes and become mainstream. However, as the partial annotation becomes insufficient, their performances drop significantly. In this paper, we leverage easily accessible unlabeled examples to facilitate the partial label consistency regularization. In addition to a partial supervised loss, our method performs a controller-guided consistency regularization at both the label-level and representation-level with the help of unlabeled data. To minimize the disadvantages of insufficient capabilities of the initial supervised model, we use the controller to estimate the confidence of each current prediction to guide the subsequent consistency regularization. Furthermore, we dynamically adjust the confidence thresholds so that the number of samples of each class participating in consistency regularization remains roughly equal to alleviate the problem of class-imbalance. Experiments show that our method achieves satisfactory performances in more practical situations, and its modules can be applied to existing PLL methods to enhance their capabilities.

Related papers

• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Adaptive End-to-End Metric Learning for Zero-Shot Cross-Domain Slot Filling [2.6056468338837457]
  Slot filling poses a critical challenge to handle a novel domain whose samples are never seen during training. Most prior works deal with this problem in a two-pass pipeline manner based on metric learning. We propose a new adaptive end-to-end metric learning scheme for the challenging zero-shot slot filling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T19:01:16Z)
• Robust Representation Learning for Unreliable Partial Label Learning [86.909511808373]
  Partial Label Learning (PLL) is a type of weakly supervised learning where each training instance is assigned a set of candidate labels, but only one label is the ground-truth. This is known as Unreliable Partial Label Learning (UPLL) that introduces an additional complexity due to the inherent unreliability and ambiguity of partial labels. We propose the Unreliability-Robust Representation Learning framework (URRL) that leverages unreliability-robust contrastive learning to help the model fortify against unreliable partial labels effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T13:37:28Z)
• Class-Distribution-Aware Pseudo Labeling for Semi-Supervised Multi-Label Learning [97.88458953075205]
  Pseudo-labeling has emerged as a popular and effective approach for utilizing unlabeled data. This paper proposes a novel solution called Class-Aware Pseudo-Labeling (CAP) that performs pseudo-labeling in a class-aware manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T12:52:18Z)
• SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learning [101.86916775218403]
  This paper revisits the popular pseudo-labeling methods via a unified sample weighting formulation. We propose SoftMatch to overcome the trade-off by maintaining both high quantity and high quality of pseudo-labels during training. In experiments, SoftMatch shows substantial improvements across a wide variety of benchmarks, including image, text, and imbalanced classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T03:53:25Z)
• Meta Objective Guided Disambiguation for Partial Label Learning [44.05801303440139]
  We propose a novel framework for partial label learning with meta objective guided disambiguation (MoGD) MoGD aims to recover the ground-truth label from candidate labels set by solving a meta objective on a small validation set. The proposed method can be easily implemented by using various deep networks with the ordinary SGD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-26T06:48:01Z)
• Contrastive Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learning [46.020125061295886]
  We propose contrastive regularization to improve both efficiency and accuracy of the consistency regularization by well-clustered features of unlabeled data. Our method also shows robust performance on open-set semi-supervised learning where unlabeled data includes out-of-distribution samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T07:20:11Z)
• Noised Consistency Training for Text Summarization [23.16890559954038]
  We argue that consistency training can be overcome by a semi-supervised approach. We have verified that leveraging large amounts of unlabeled data decently improves the performance of supervised learning over an insufficient labeled dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T07:21:39Z)
• In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning [53.1047775185362]
  Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation. We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models. We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T23:29:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.