Hypothesis Testing using Causal and Causal Variational Generative Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11275v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:46:15 GMT
• Title: Hypothesis Testing using Causal and Causal Variational Generative Models
• Authors: Jeffrey Jiang, Omead Pooladzandi, Sunay Bhat, Gregory Pottie
• Abstract summary: Causal Gen and Causal Variational Gen can utilize nonparametric structural causal knowledge combined with a deep learning functional approximation. We show how, using a deliberate (non-random) split of training and testing data, these models can generalize better to similar, but out-of-distribution data points. We validate our methods on a synthetic pendulum dataset, as well as a trauma surgery ground level fall dataset.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Hypothesis testing and the usage of expert knowledge, or causal priors, has not been well explored in the context of generative models. We propose a novel set of generative architectures, Causal Gen and Causal Variational Gen, that can utilize nonparametric structural causal knowledge combined with a deep learning functional approximation. We show how, using a deliberate (non-random) split of training and testing data, these models can generalize better to similar, but out-of-distribution data points, than non-causal generative models and prediction models such as Variational autoencoders and Fully Connected Neural Networks. We explore using this generalization error as a proxy for causal model hypothesis testing. We further show how dropout can be used to learn functional relationships of structural models that are difficult to learn with traditional methods. We validate our methods on a synthetic pendulum dataset, as well as a trauma surgery ground level fall dataset.

Related papers

• Demystifying amortized causal discovery with transformers [21.058343547918053]
  Supervised learning approaches for causal discovery from observational data often achieve competitive performance. In this work, we investigate CSIvA, a transformer-based model promising to train on synthetic data and transfer to real data. We bridge the gap with existing identifiability theory and show that constraints on the training data distribution implicitly define a prior on the test observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T08:17:49Z)
• Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models [28.116832159265964]
  We train a supervised model that learns to predict a larger causal graph from the outputs of classical causal discovery algorithms run over subsets of variables. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of classical methods remain comparable across datasets. Experiments on real and synthetic data demonstrate that this model maintains high accuracy in the face of misspecification or distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T21:57:58Z)
• From Identifiable Causal Representations to Controllable Counterfactual Generation: A Survey on Causal Generative Modeling [17.074858228123706]
  We focus on fundamental theory, methodology, drawbacks, datasets, and metrics. We cover applications of causal generative models in fairness, privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, precision medicine, and biological sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T05:45:32Z)
• A Generative Modeling Framework for Inferring Families of Biomechanical Constitutive Laws in Data-Sparse Regimes [0.15658704610960567]
  We propose a novel approach to efficiently infer families of relationships in data-sparse regimes. Inspired by the concept of functional priors, we develop a generative network (GAN) that incorporates a neural operator as the generator and a fully-connected network as the adversarial discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T22:07:27Z)
• De-Biasing Generative Models using Counterfactual Methods [0.0]
  We propose a new decoder based framework named the Causal Counterfactual Generative Model (CCGM) Our proposed method combines a causal latent space VAE model with specific modification to emphasize causal fidelity. We explore how better disentanglement of causal learning and encoding/decoding generates higher causal intervention quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T16:53:20Z)
• HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection [77.86861638371926]
  We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models. We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• Amortized Inference for Causal Structure Learning [72.84105256353801]
  Learning causal structure poses a search problem that typically involves evaluating structures using a score or independence test. We train a variational inference model to predict the causal structure from observational/interventional data. Our models exhibit robust generalization capabilities under substantial distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:37:08Z)
• Firearm Detection via Convolutional Neural Networks: Comparing a Semantic Segmentation Model Against End-to-End Solutions [68.8204255655161]
  Threat detection of weapons and aggressive behavior from live video can be used for rapid detection and prevention of potentially deadly incidents. One way for achieving this is through the use of artificial intelligence and, in particular, machine learning for image analysis. We compare a traditional monolithic end-to-end deep learning model and a previously proposed model based on an ensemble of simpler neural networks detecting fire-weapons via semantic segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T15:19:29Z)
• On the Transferability of Adversarial Attacksagainst Neural Text Classifier [121.6758865857686]
  We investigate the transferability of adversarial examples for text classification models. We propose a genetic algorithm to find an ensemble of models that can induce adversarial examples to fool almost all existing models. We derive word replacement rules that can be used for model diagnostics from these adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T10:45:05Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.