How Bad is Selfish Driving? Bounding the Inefficiency of Equilibria in Urban Driving Games

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13064v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 09:32:40 GMT
• Title: How Bad is Selfish Driving? Bounding the Inefficiency of Equilibria in Urban Driving Games
• Authors: Alessandro Zanardi, Pier Giuseppe Sessa, Nando K\"aslin, Saverio Bolognani, Andrea Censi, Emilio Frazzoli
• Abstract summary: We study the (in)efficiency of any equilibrium players might agree to play. We obtain guarantees that refine existing bounds on the Price of Anarchy. Although the obtained guarantees concern open-loop trajectories, we observe efficient equilibria even when agents employ closed-loop policies.
• Score: 64.71476526716668
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We consider the interaction among agents engaging in a driving task and we model it as general-sum game. This class of games exhibits a plurality of different equilibria posing the issue of equilibrium selection. While selecting the most efficient equilibrium (in term of social cost) is often impractical from a computational standpoint, in this work we study the (in)efficiency of any equilibrium players might agree to play. More specifically, we bound the equilibrium inefficiency by modeling driving games as particular type of congestion games over spatio-temporal resources. We obtain novel guarantees that refine existing bounds on the Price of Anarchy (PoA) as a function of problem-dependent game parameters. For instance, the relative trade-off between proximity costs and personal objectives such as comfort and progress. Although the obtained guarantees concern open-loop trajectories, we observe efficient equilibria even when agents employ closed-loop policies trained via decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning.

Related papers

• On Tractable $Φ$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games [53.212133025684224]
  Non-concave games introduce significant game-theoretic and optimization challenges. We show that when $Phi$ is finite, there exists an efficient uncoupled learning algorithm that converges to the corresponding $Phi$-equilibria. We also show that Online Gradient Descent can efficiently approximate $Phi$-equilibria in non-trivial regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T01:51:30Z)
• Bayes correlated equilibria and no-regret dynamics [9.89901717499058]
  This paper explores equilibrium concepts for Bayesian games, which are fundamental models of games with incomplete information. We focus on communication equilibria, which can be realized by a mediator who gathers each player's private information and then sends correlated recommendations to the players. We present an efficient algorithm for minimizing untruthful swap regret with a sublinear upper bound, which we prove to be tight up to a multiplicative constant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T06:22:51Z)
• Soft-Bellman Equilibrium in Affine Markov Games: Forward Solutions and Inverse Learning [37.176741793213694]
  We formulate a class of Markov games, termed affine Markov games, where an affine reward function couples the players' actions. We introduce a novel solution concept, the soft-Bellman equilibrium, where each player is boundedly rational and chooses a soft-Bellman policy. We then solve the inverse game problem of inferring the players' reward parameters from observed state-action trajectories via a projected-gradient algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T22:50:47Z)
• Abstracting Imperfect Information Away from Two-Player Zero-Sum Games [85.27865680662973]
  Nayyar et al. (2013) showed that imperfect information can be abstracted away from common-payoff games by having players publicly announce their policies as they play. This work shows that certain regularized equilibria do not possess the aforementioned non-correspondence problem. Because these regularized equilibria can be made arbitrarily close to Nash equilibria, our result opens the door to a new perspective to solving two-player zero-sum games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-22T16:54:06Z)
• Finding mixed-strategy equilibria of continuous-action games without gradients using randomized policy networks [83.28949556413717]
  We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of continuous-action game without access to gradients. We model players' strategies using artificial neural networks. This paper is the first to solve general continuous-action games with unrestricted mixed strategies and without any gradient information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T05:16:41Z)
• Learning Correlated Equilibria in Mean-Field Games [62.14589406821103]
  We develop the concepts of Mean-Field correlated and coarse-correlated equilibria. We show that they can be efficiently learnt in emphall games, without requiring any additional assumption on the structure of the game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T08:31:46Z)
• Inducing Equilibria via Incentives: Simultaneous Design-and-Play Finds Global Optima [114.31577038081026]
  We propose an efficient method that tackles the designer's and agents' problems simultaneously in a single loop. Although the designer does not solve the equilibrium problem repeatedly, it can anticipate the overall influence of the incentives on the agents. We prove that the algorithm converges to the global optima at a sublinear rate for a broad class of games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T06:53:59Z)
• Follow-the-Regularized-Leader Routes to Chaos in Routing Games [23.497377573947382]
  We study the emergence of chaotic behavior of Follow-the-Regularized Leader (FoReL) dynamics in games. We show the existence of novel non-standard phenomena such as the coexistence of stable Nash equilibria and chaos in the same game. Although FoReL dynamics can be strange and non-equilibrating, we prove that the time average still converges to an exact equilibrium for any choice of learning rate and any scale of costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T06:40:31Z)
• Hindsight and Sequential Rationality of Correlated Play [18.176128899338433]
  We look at algorithms that ensure strong performance in hindsight relative to what could have been achieved with modified behavior. We develop and advocate for this hindsight framing of learning in general sequential decision-making settings. We present examples illustrating the distinct strengths and weaknesses of each type of equilibrium in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T18:30:21Z)
• Efficient Competitive Self-Play Policy Optimization [20.023522000925094]
  We propose a new algorithmic framework for competitive self-play reinforcement learning in two-player zero-sum games. Our method trains several agents simultaneously, and intelligently takes each other as opponent based on simple adversarial rules. We prove theoretically that our algorithm converges to an approximate equilibrium with high probability in convex-concave games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-13T21:01:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.