Improving Multi-class Classifier Using Likelihood Ratio Estimation with Regularization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16033v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:07:53 GMT
• Title: Improving Multi-class Classifier Using Likelihood Ratio Estimation with Regularization
• Authors: Masato Kikuchi, Tadachika Ozono
• Abstract summary: The universal-set naive Bayes classifier (UNB)citeKomiya:13, defined using likelihood ratios (LRs) was proposed to address imbalanced classification problems. The LR estimator used in the UNB overestimates LRs for low-frequency data, degrading the classification performance. Our experiments with imbalanced data showed that our proposed classifier effectively adjusts the classification scores according to the class balance using regularization parameters.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The universal-set naive Bayes classifier (UNB)~\cite{Komiya:13}, defined using likelihood ratios (LRs), was proposed to address imbalanced classification problems. However, the LR estimator used in the UNB overestimates LRs for low-frequency data, degrading the classification performance. Our previous study~\cite{Kikuchi:19} proposed an effective LR estimator even for low-frequency data. This estimator uses regularization to suppress the overestimation, but we did not consider imbalanced data. In this paper, we integrated the estimator with the UNB. Our experiments with imbalanced data showed that our proposed classifier effectively adjusts the classification scores according to the class balance using regularization parameters and improves the classification performance.

Related papers

• Robust performance metrics for imbalanced classification problems [2.07180164747172]
  We show that established performance metrics in binary classification, such as the F-score, are not robust to class imbalance. We introduce robust modifications of the F-score and the MCC for which, even in strongly imbalanced settings, the TPR is bounded away from $0$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T11:50:05Z)
• Deep Imbalanced Regression via Hierarchical Classification Adjustment [50.19438850112964]
  Regression tasks in computer vision are often formulated into classification by quantizing the target space into classes. The majority of training samples lie in a head range of target values, while a minority of samples span a usually larger tail range. We propose to construct hierarchical classifiers for solving imbalanced regression tasks. Our novel hierarchical classification adjustment (HCA) for imbalanced regression shows superior results on three diverse tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T04:54:39Z)
• Revisiting Long-tailed Image Classification: Survey and Benchmarks with New Evaluation Metrics [88.39382177059747]
  A corpus of metrics is designed for measuring the accuracy, robustness, and bounds of algorithms for learning with long-tailed distribution. Based on our benchmarks, we re-evaluate the performance of existing methods on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T02:40:54Z)
• Proposal Distribution Calibration for Few-Shot Object Detection [65.19808035019031]
  In few-shot object detection (FSOD), the two-step training paradigm is widely adopted to mitigate the severe sample imbalance. Unfortunately, the extreme data scarcity aggravates the proposal distribution bias, hindering the RoI head from evolving toward novel classes. We introduce a simple yet effective proposal distribution calibration (PDC) approach to neatly enhance the localization and classification abilities of the RoI head.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T05:09:11Z)
• Adaptive Dimension Reduction and Variational Inference for Transductive Few-Shot Classification [2.922007656878633]
  We propose a new clustering method based on Variational Bayesian inference, further improved by Adaptive Dimension Reduction. Our proposed method significantly improves accuracy in the realistic unbalanced transductive setting on various Few-Shot benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-18T10:29:02Z)
• Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learning [64.96088324684683]
  We propose textitPrototypical, which does not require fitting additional parameters given the embedding network. Prototypical produces balanced and comparable predictions for all classes even though the training set is class-imbalanced. We test our method on CIFAR-10LT, CIFAR-100LT and Webvision datasets, observing that Prototypical obtains substaintial improvements compared with state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T01:55:01Z)
• When in Doubt: Improving Classification Performance with Alternating Normalization [57.39356691967766]
  We introduce Classification with Alternating Normalization (CAN), a non-parametric post-processing step for classification. CAN improves classification accuracy for challenging examples by re-adjusting their predicted class probability distribution. We empirically demonstrate its effectiveness across a diverse set of classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T02:55:42Z)
• Robust Importance Sampling for Error Estimation in the Context of Optimal Bayesian Transfer Learning [13.760785726194591]
  We introduce a novel class of Bayesian minimum mean-square error (MMSE) estimators for optimal Bayesian transfer learning (OBTL) We employ the proposed estimator to evaluate the classification accuracy of a broad family of classifiers that span diverse learning capabilities. Experimental results based on both synthetic data as well as real-world RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data show that our proposed OBTL error estimation scheme clearly outperforms standard error estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-05T19:11:33Z)
• Re-Assessing the "Classify and Count" Quantification Method [88.60021378715636]
  "Classify and Count" (CC) is often a biased estimator. Previous works have failed to use properly optimised versions of CC. We argue that, while still inferior to some cutting-edge methods, they deliver near-state-of-the-art accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T21:47:39Z)
• A Skew-Sensitive Evaluation Framework for Imbalanced Data Classification [11.125446871030734]
  Class distribution skews in imbalanced datasets may lead to models with prediction bias towards majority classes. We propose a simple and general-purpose evaluation framework for imbalanced data classification that is sensitive to arbitrary skews in class cardinalities and importances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T19:47:09Z)
• On Model Evaluation under Non-constant Class Imbalance [0.0]
  Many real-world classification problems are significantly class-imbalanced to detriment of the class of interest. The usual assumption is that the test dataset imbalance equals the real-world imbalance. We introduce methods focusing on evaluation under non-constant class imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T21:52:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.