Revisiting Long-tailed Image Classification: Survey and Benchmarks with New Evaluation Metrics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01507v1
• Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 02:40:54 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Long-tailed Image Classification: Survey and Benchmarks with New Evaluation Metrics
• Authors: Chaowei Fang, Dingwen Zhang, Wen Zheng, Xue Li, Le Yang, Lechao Cheng, Junwei Han
• Abstract summary: A corpus of metrics is designed for measuring the accuracy, robustness, and bounds of algorithms for learning with long-tailed distribution. Based on our benchmarks, we re-evaluate the performance of existing methods on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets.
• Score: 88.39382177059747
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, long-tailed image classification harvests lots of research attention, since the data distribution is long-tailed in many real-world situations. Piles of algorithms are devised to address the data imbalance problem by biasing the training process towards less frequent classes. However, they usually evaluate the performance on a balanced testing set or multiple independent testing sets having distinct distributions with the training data. Considering the testing data may have arbitrary distributions, existing evaluation strategies are unable to reflect the actual classification performance objectively. We set up novel evaluation benchmarks based on a series of testing sets with evolving distributions. A corpus of metrics are designed for measuring the accuracy, robustness, and bounds of algorithms for learning with long-tailed distribution. Based on our benchmarks, we re-evaluate the performance of existing methods on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets, which is valuable for guiding the selection of data rebalancing techniques. We also revisit existing methods and categorize them into four types including data balancing, feature balancing, loss balancing, and prediction balancing, according the focused procedure during the training pipeline.

Related papers

• Probabilistic Contrastive Learning for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition [78.70453964041718]
  Longtailed distributions frequently emerge in real-world data, where a large number of minority categories contain a limited number of samples. Recent investigations have revealed that supervised contrastive learning exhibits promising potential in alleviating the data imbalance. We propose a novel probabilistic contrastive (ProCo) learning algorithm that estimates the data distribution of the samples from each class in the feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T13:44:49Z)
• Hybrid Ensemble optimized algorithm based on Genetic Programming for imbalanced data classification [0.0]
  We propose a hybrid ensemble algorithm based on Genetic Programming (GP) for two classes of imbalanced data classification. Experimental results show the performance of the proposed method on the specified data sets in the size of the training set shows 40% and 50% better accuracy than other dimensions of the minority class prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T14:14:38Z)
• Robust Fairness-aware Learning Under Sample Selection Bias [17.09665420515772]
  We propose a framework for robust and fair learning under sample selection bias. We develop two algorithms to handle sample selection bias when test data is both available and unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T23:23:36Z)
• Semi-supervised Long-tailed Recognition using Alternate Sampling [95.93760490301395]
  Main challenges in long-tailed recognition come from the imbalanced data distribution and sample scarcity in its tail classes. We propose a new recognition setting, namely semi-supervised long-tailed recognition. We demonstrate significant accuracy improvements over other competitive methods on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-01T00:43:38Z)
• A Skew-Sensitive Evaluation Framework for Imbalanced Data Classification [11.125446871030734]
  Class distribution skews in imbalanced datasets may lead to models with prediction bias towards majority classes. We propose a simple and general-purpose evaluation framework for imbalanced data classification that is sensitive to arbitrary skews in class cardinalities and importances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T19:47:09Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)
• Long-Tailed Recognition Using Class-Balanced Experts [128.73438243408393]
  We propose an ensemble of class-balanced experts that combines the strength of diverse classifiers. Our ensemble of class-balanced experts reaches results close to state-of-the-art and an extended ensemble establishes a new state-of-the-art on two benchmarks for long-tailed recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T20:57:44Z)
• Rethinking Class-Balanced Methods for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition from a Domain Adaptation Perspective [98.70226503904402]
  Object frequency in the real world often follows a power law, leading to a mismatch between datasets with long-tailed class distributions. We propose to augment the classic class-balanced learning by explicitly estimating the differences between the class-conditioned distributions with a meta-learning approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T11:28:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.