Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17546v3
• Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:58:48 GMT
• Title: Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy
• Authors: Daphne Ippolito, Florian Tram\`er, Milad Nasr, Chiyuan Zhang, Matthew Jagielski, Katherine Lee, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Nicholas Carlini
• Abstract summary: We argue that verbatim memorization definitions are too restrictive and fail to capture more subtle forms of memorization. Specifically, we design and implement an efficient defense that perfectly prevents all verbatim memorization. We conclude by discussing potential alternative definitions and why defining memorization is a difficult yet crucial open question for neural language models.
• Score: 91.98116450958331
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Studying data memorization in neural language models helps us understand the risks (e.g., to privacy or copyright) associated with models regurgitating training data and aids in the development of countermeasures. Many prior works -- and some recently deployed defenses -- focus on "verbatim memorization", defined as a model generation that exactly matches a substring from the training set. We argue that verbatim memorization definitions are too restrictive and fail to capture more subtle forms of memorization. Specifically, we design and implement an efficient defense that perfectly prevents all verbatim memorization. And yet, we demonstrate that this "perfect" filter does not prevent the leakage of training data. Indeed, it is easily circumvented by plausible and minimally modified "style-transfer" prompts -- and in some cases even the non-modified original prompts -- to extract memorized information. We conclude by discussing potential alternative definitions and why defining memorization is a difficult yet crucial open question for neural language models.

Related papers

• Measuring Non-Adversarial Reproduction of Training Data in Large Language Models [71.55350441396243]
  We quantify the overlap between model responses and pretraining data when responding to natural and benign prompts. We find that up to 15% of the text output by popular conversational language models overlaps with snippets from the Internet. While appropriate prompting can reduce non-adversarial reproduction on average, we find that mitigating worst-case reproduction of training data requires stronger defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T14:55:01Z)
• Detecting, Explaining, and Mitigating Memorization in Diffusion Models [49.438362005962375]
  We introduce a straightforward yet effective method for detecting memorized prompts by inspecting the magnitude of text-conditional predictions. Our proposed method seamlessly integrates without disrupting sampling algorithms, and delivers high accuracy even at the first generation step. Building on our detection strategy, we unveil an explainable approach that shows the contribution of individual words or tokens to memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T16:13:29Z)
• Demystifying Verbatim Memorization in Large Language Models [67.49068128909349]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently memorize long sequences verbatim, often with serious legal and privacy implications. We develop a framework to study verbatim memorization in a controlled setting by continuing pre-training from Pythia checkpoints with injected sequences. We find that (1) non-trivial amounts of repetition are necessary for verbatim memorization to happen; (2) later (and presumably better) checkpoints are more likely to memorize verbatim sequences, even for out-of-distribution sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T07:10:31Z)
• Uncovering Latent Memories: Assessing Data Leakage and Memorization Patterns in Frontier AI Models [7.50189359952191]
  We show that sequences which are not memorized after the first encounter can be "uncovered" throughout the course of training. The presence of latent memorization presents a challenge for data privacy as memorized sequences may be hidden at the final checkpoint of the model. We develop a diagnostic test relying on the cross entropy loss to uncover latent memorized sequences with high accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:56:17Z)
• SoK: Memorization in General-Purpose Large Language Models [25.448127387943053]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are advancing at a remarkable pace, with myriad applications under development. LLMs can memorize short secrets in the training data, but can also memorize concepts like facts or writing styles that can be expressed in text in many different ways. We propose a taxonomy for memorization in LLMs that covers verbatim text, facts, ideas and algorithms, writing styles, distributional properties, and alignment goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T14:25:53Z)
• Quantifying and Analyzing Entity-level Memorization in Large Language Models [4.59914731734176]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been proven capable of memorizing their training data. Privacy risks arising from memorization have attracted increasing attention. We propose a fine-grained, entity-level definition to quantify memorization with conditions and metrics closer to real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T03:06:47Z)
• Mitigating Approximate Memorization in Language Models via Dissimilarity Learned Policy [0.0]
  Large Language models (LLMs) are trained on large amounts of data. LLMs showed to memorize parts of the training data and emit those data verbatim when an adversary prompts appropriately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T15:53:28Z)
• Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models [61.58529162310382]
  Large language models (LMs) have been shown to memorize parts of their training data, and when prompted appropriately, they will emit the memorized data verbatim. This is undesirable because memorization violates privacy (exposing user data), degrades utility (repeated easy-to-memorize text is often low quality), and hurts fairness (some texts are memorized over others). We describe three log-linear relationships that quantify the degree to which LMs emit memorized training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T18:48:31Z)
• Counterfactual Memorization in Neural Language Models [91.8747020391287]
  Modern neural language models that are widely used in various NLP tasks risk memorizing sensitive information from their training data. An open question in previous studies of language model memorization is how to filter out "common" memorization. We formulate a notion of counterfactual memorization which characterizes how a model's predictions change if a particular document is omitted during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-24T04:20:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.