State-of-the-art Models for Object Detection in Various Fields of Application

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00733v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:25:32 GMT
• Title: State-of-the-art Models for Object Detection in Various Fields of Application
• Authors: Syed Ali John Naqvi and Syed Bazil Ali
• Abstract summary: COCO minival, COCO test, Pascal VOC 2007, ADE20K, and ImageNet are reviewed. The datasets are handpicked after closely comparing them with the rest in terms of diversity, quality of data, minimal bias, labeling quality etc. It lists the top models and their optimal use cases for each of the respective datasets.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a list of datasets and their best models with the goal of advancing the state-of-the-art in object detection by placing the question of object recognition in the context of the two types of state-of-the-art methods: one-stage methods and two stage-methods. We provided an in-depth statistical analysis of the five top datasets in the light of recent developments in granulated Deep Learning models - COCO minival, COCO test, Pascal VOC 2007, ADE20K, and ImageNet. The datasets are handpicked after closely comparing them with the rest in terms of diversity, quality of data, minimal bias, labeling quality etc. More importantly, our work extends to provide the best combination of these datasets with the emerging models in the last two years. It lists the top models and their optimal use cases for each of the respective datasets. We have provided a comprehensive overview of a variety of both generic and specific object detection models, enlisting comparative results like inference time and average precision of box (AP) fixed at different Intersection Over Union (IoUs) and for different sized objects. The qualitative and quantitative analysis will allow experts to achieve new performance records using the best combination of datasets and models.

Related papers

• Diffusion Models as Data Mining Tools [87.77999285241219]
  This paper demonstrates how to use generative models trained for image synthesis as tools for visual data mining. We show that after finetuning conditional diffusion models to synthesize images from a specific dataset, we can use these models to define a typicality measure. This measure assesses how typical visual elements are for different data labels, such as geographic location, time stamps, semantic labels, or even the presence of a disease.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T17:14:31Z)
• Multi-document Summarization: A Comparative Evaluation [0.0]
  This paper is aimed at evaluating state-of-the-art models for Multi-document Summarization (MDS) on different types of datasets in various domains. We analyzed the performance of PRIMERA and PEG models on Big-Survey and MS$2$ datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-10T07:43:42Z)
• Confidence-based Ensembles of End-to-End Speech Recognition Models [71.65982591023581]
  We show that a confidence-based ensemble of 5 monolingual models outperforms a system where model selection is performed via a dedicated language identification block. We also demonstrate that it is possible to combine base and adapted models to achieve strong results on both original and target data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T23:13:43Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summaries [16.80986701058596]
  We introduce IMACS, a method that combines gradient-based model attributions with aggregation and visualization techniques. IMACS extracts salient input features from an evaluation dataset, clusters them based on similarity, then visualizes differences in model attributions for similar input features. We show how our technique can uncover behavioral differences caused by domain shift between two models trained on satellite images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T21:35:14Z)
• Data-driven Model Generalizability in Crosslinguistic Low-resource Morphological Segmentation [4.339613097080119]
  In low-resource scenarios, artifacts of the data collection can yield data sets that are outliers, potentially making conclusions about model performance coincidental. We compare three broad classes of models with different parameterizations, taking data from 11 languages across 6 language families. The results demonstrate that the extent of model generalization depends on the characteristics of the data set, and does not necessarily rely heavily on the data set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T22:19:10Z)
• Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
  We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples. We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models. We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z)
• Salient Objects in Clutter [130.63976772770368]
  This paper identifies and addresses a serious design bias of existing salient object detection (SOD) datasets. This design bias has led to a saturation in performance for state-of-the-art SOD models when evaluated on existing datasets. We propose a new high-quality dataset and update the previous saliency benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T03:49:26Z)
• Improving QA Generalization by Concurrent Modeling of Multiple Biases [61.597362592536896]
  Existing NLP datasets contain various biases that models can easily exploit to achieve high performances on the corresponding evaluation sets. We propose a general framework for improving the performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets by concurrent modeling of multiple biases in the training data. We extensively evaluate our framework on extractive question answering with training data from various domains with multiple biases of different strengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T11:18:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.