A Semiparametric Efficient Approach To Label Shift Estimation and Quantification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.04274v1
• Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 07:49:29 GMT
• Title: A Semiparametric Efficient Approach To Label Shift Estimation and Quantification
• Authors: Brandon Tse Wei Chow
• Abstract summary: We present a new procedure called SELSE which estimates the shift in the response variable's distribution. We prove that SELSE's normalized error has the smallest possible variance matrix compared to any other algorithm in that family.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Transfer Learning is an area of statistics and machine learning research that seeks answers to the following question: how do we build successful learning algorithms when the data available for training our model is qualitatively different from the data we hope the model will perform well on? In this thesis, we focus on a specific area of Transfer Learning called label shift, also known as quantification. In quantification, the aforementioned discrepancy is isolated to a shift in the distribution of the response variable. In such a setting, accurately inferring the response variable's new distribution is both an important estimation task in its own right and a crucial step for ensuring that the learning algorithm can adapt to the new data. We make two contributions to this field. First, we present a new procedure called SELSE which estimates the shift in the response variable's distribution. Second, we prove that SELSE is semiparametric efficient among a large family of quantification algorithms, i.e., SELSE's normalized error has the smallest possible asymptotic variance matrix compared to any other algorithm in that family. This family includes nearly all existing algorithms, including ACC/PACC quantifiers and maximum likelihood based quantifiers such as EMQ and MLLS. Empirical experiments reveal that SELSE is competitive with, and in many cases outperforms, existing state-of-the-art quantification methods, and that this improvement is especially large when the number of test samples is far greater than the number of train samples.

Related papers

• Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling Functions [7.228285747845779]
  We study a variant of Collaborative PAC Learning, in which we aim to learn an accurate classifier for each of the $n$ data distributions. We show that, when the data distributions satisfy a weaker realizability assumption, sample-efficient learning is still feasible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T04:32:22Z)
• Learning Hidden Markov Models Using Conditional Samples [72.20944611510198]
  This paper is concerned with the computational complexity of learning the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) In this paper, we consider an interactive access model, in which the algorithm can query for samples from the conditional distributions of the HMMs. Specifically, we obtain efficient algorithms for learning HMMs in settings where we have query access to the exact conditional probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T16:53:41Z)
• Towards Automated Imbalanced Learning with Deep Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [57.163525407022966]
  Imbalanced learning is a fundamental challenge in data mining, where there is a disproportionate ratio of training samples in each class. Over-sampling is an effective technique to tackle imbalanced learning through generating synthetic samples for the minority class. We propose AutoSMOTE, an automated over-sampling algorithm that can jointly optimize different levels of decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-26T04:28:01Z)
• Engineering the Neural Automatic Passenger Counter [0.0]
  We explore and exploit various aspects of machine learning to increase reliability, performance, and counting quality. We show how aggregation techniques such as ensemble quantiles can reduce bias, and we give an idea of the overall spread of the results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T14:56:11Z)
• A Lagrangian Duality Approach to Active Learning [119.36233726867992]
  We consider the batch active learning problem, where only a subset of the training data is labeled. We formulate the learning problem using constrained optimization, where each constraint bounds the performance of the model on labeled samples. We show, via numerical experiments, that our proposed approach performs similarly to or better than state-of-the-art active learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T19:18:49Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)
• How to distribute data across tasks for meta-learning? [59.608652082495624]
  We show that the optimal number of data points per task depends on the budget, but it converges to a unique constant value for large budgets. Our results suggest a simple and efficient procedure for data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T15:38:47Z)
• Flexible Model Aggregation for Quantile Regression [92.63075261170302]
  Quantile regression is a fundamental problem in statistical learning motivated by a need to quantify uncertainty in predictions. We investigate methods for aggregating any number of conditional quantile models. All of the models we consider in this paper can be fit using modern deep learning toolkits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-26T23:21:16Z)
• The Integrity of Machine Learning Algorithms against Software Defect Prediction [0.0]
  This report analyses the performance of the Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine (OS-ELM) proposed by Liang et.al. OS-ELM trains faster than conventional deep neural networks and it always converges to the globally optimal solution. The analysis is carried out on 3 projects KC1, PC4 and PC3 carried out by the NASA group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-05T17:26:56Z)
• On the Robustness of Active Learning [0.7340017786387767]
  Active Learning is concerned with how to identify the most useful samples for a Machine Learning algorithm to be trained with. We find that it is often applied with not enough care and domain knowledge. We propose the new "Sum of Squared Logits" method based on the Simpson diversity index and investigate the effect of using the confusion matrix for balancing in sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T09:07:23Z)
• Fase-AL -- Adaptation of Fast Adaptive Stacking of Ensembles for Supporting Active Learning [0.0]
  This work presents the FASE-AL algorithm which induces classification models with non-labeled instances using Active Learning. The algorithm achieves promising results in terms of the percentage of correctly classified instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-30T17:25:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.