Improving Factual Consistency in Summarization with Compression-Based Post-Editing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06196v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:35:38 GMT
• Title: Improving Factual Consistency in Summarization with Compression-Based Post-Editing
• Authors: Alexander R. Fabbri, Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Jesse Vig, Chien-Sheng Wu, Caiming Xiong
• Abstract summary: We show that a model-agnostic way to address this problem is post-editing the generated summaries. We propose to use sentence-compression data to train the post-editing model to take a summary with extrinsic entity errors marked with special tokens. We show that this model improves factual consistency while maintaining ROUGE, improving entity precision by up to 30% on XSum, and that this model can be applied on top of another post-editor.
• Score: 146.24839415743358
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: State-of-the-art summarization models still struggle to be factually consistent with the input text. A model-agnostic way to address this problem is post-editing the generated summaries. However, existing approaches typically fail to remove entity errors if a suitable input entity replacement is not available or may insert erroneous content. In our work, we focus on removing extrinsic entity errors, or entities not in the source, to improve consistency while retaining the summary's essential information and form. We propose to use sentence-compression data to train the post-editing model to take a summary with extrinsic entity errors marked with special tokens and output a compressed, well-formed summary with those errors removed. We show that this model improves factual consistency while maintaining ROUGE, improving entity precision by up to 30% on XSum, and that this model can be applied on top of another post-editor, improving entity precision by up to a total of 38%. We perform an extensive comparison of post-editing approaches that demonstrate trade-offs between factual consistency, informativeness, and grammaticality, and we analyze settings where post-editors show the largest improvements.

Related papers

• Detecting Errors through Ensembling Prompts (DEEP): An End-to-End LLM Framework for Detecting Factual Errors [11.07539342949602]
  We propose an end-to-end framework for detecting factual errors in text summarization. Our framework uses a diverse set of LLM prompts to identify factual inconsistencies. We calibrate the ensembled models to produce empirically accurate probabilities that a text is factually consistent or free of hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T18:59:37Z)
• Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infilling [56.70682379371534]
  We show that our approach vastly outperforms prior methods in correcting erroneous summaries. Our model -- FactEdit -- improves factuality scores by over 11 points on CNN/DM and over 31 points on XSum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T07:16:19Z)
• Memory-Based Model Editing at Scale [102.28475739907498]
  Existing model editors struggle to accurately model an edit's intended scope. We propose Semi-Parametric Editing with a Retrieval-Augmented Counterfactual Model (SERAC) SERAC stores edits in an explicit memory and learns to reason over them to modulate the base model's predictions as needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T23:40:34Z)
• Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summaries Using Entity Retrieval [57.01193722520597]
  We propose an efficient factual error correction system RFEC based on entities retrieval post-editing process. RFEC retrieves the evidence sentences from the original document by comparing the sentences with the target summary. Next, RFEC detects the entity-level errors in the summaries by considering the evidence sentences and substitutes the wrong entities with the accurate entities from the evidence sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T11:35:02Z)
• Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models [41.77317902748772]
  We propose a post-editing corrector module to correct factual errors in generated summaries. We show that our model is able to correct factual errors in summaries generated by other neural summarization models. We also find that transferring from artificial error correction to downstream settings is still very challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-17T04:24:16Z)
• Compressive Summarization with Plausibility and Salience Modeling [54.37665950633147]
  We propose to relax the rigid syntactic constraints on candidate spans and instead leave compression decisions to two data-driven criteria: plausibility and salience. Our method achieves strong in-domain results on benchmark summarization datasets, and human evaluation shows that the plausibility model generally selects for grammatical and factual deletions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T17:07:10Z)
• Enhancing Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization [57.67609672082137]
  We propose a fact-aware summarization model FASum to extract and integrate factual relations into the summary generation process. We then design a factual corrector model FC to automatically correct factual errors from summaries generated by existing systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T07:36:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.