Analysis of Male and Female Speakers' Word Choices in Public Speeches
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06366v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 17:30:28 GMT
- Title: Analysis of Male and Female Speakers' Word Choices in Public Speeches
- Authors: Md Zobaer Hossain, Ahnaf Mozib Samin
- Abstract summary: We compared the word choices of male and female presenters in public addresses such as TED lectures.
Based on our data, we determined that male speakers use specific types of linguistic, psychological, cognitive, and social words in considerably greater frequency than female speakers.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The extent to which men and women use language differently has been
questioned previously. Finding clear and consistent gender differences in
language is not conclusive in general, and the research is heavily influenced
by the context and method employed to identify the difference. In addition, the
majority of the research was conducted in written form, and the sample was
collected in writing. Therefore, we compared the word choices of male and
female presenters in public addresses such as TED lectures. The frequency of
numerous types of words, such as parts of speech (POS), linguistic,
psychological, and cognitive terms were analyzed statistically to determine how
male and female speakers use words differently. Based on our data, we
determined that male speakers use specific types of linguistic, psychological,
cognitive, and social words in considerably greater frequency than female
speakers.
Related papers
- What an Elegant Bridge: Multilingual LLMs are Biased Similarly in Different Languages [51.0349882045866]
This paper investigates biases of Large Language Models (LLMs) through the lens of grammatical gender.
We prompt a model to describe nouns with adjectives in various languages, focusing specifically on languages with grammatical gender.
We find that a simple classifier can not only predict noun gender above chance but also exhibit cross-language transferability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T22:10:16Z) - Gender Bias in Large Language Models across Multiple Languages [10.068466432117113]
We examine gender bias in large language models (LLMs) generated for different languages.
We use three measurements: 1) gender bias in selecting descriptive words given the gender-related context.
2) gender bias in selecting gender-related pronouns (she/he) given the descriptive words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T04:47:16Z) - The Causal Influence of Grammatical Gender on Distributional Semantics [87.8027818528463]
How much meaning influences gender assignment across languages is an active area of research in linguistics and cognitive science.
We offer a novel, causal graphical model that jointly represents the interactions between a noun's grammatical gender, its meaning, and adjective choice.
When we control for the meaning of the noun, the relationship between grammatical gender and adjective choice is near zero and insignificant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T13:58:13Z) - Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency,
Syntax, and Semantics [3.4048739113355215]
We provide a comprehensive analysis of group-based biases in widely-used static English word embeddings trained on internet corpora.
Using the Single-Category Word Embedding Association Test, we demonstrate the widespread prevalence of gender biases.
We find that, of the 1,000 most frequent words in the vocabulary, 77% are more associated with men than women.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T15:35:10Z) - Analyzing Gender Representation in Multilingual Models [59.21915055702203]
We focus on the representation of gender distinctions as a practical case study.
We examine the extent to which the gender concept is encoded in shared subspaces across different languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-20T00:13:01Z) - Perception Point: Identifying Critical Learning Periods in Speech for
Bilingual Networks [58.24134321728942]
We compare and identify cognitive aspects on deep neural-based visual lip-reading models.
We observe a strong correlation between these theories in cognitive psychology and our unique modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T05:30:50Z) - Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language
Models [104.41668491794974]
We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender.
We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z) - Predicting gender and age categories in English conversations using
lexical, non-lexical, and turn-taking features [3.2766169283137385]
We examine behavioural differences between speakers labelled for gender and age categories in the SpokenBNC.
We find that female speakers tend to produce more and slightly longer turns, while turns by male speakers feature a higher type-token ratio.
Across age groups, we observe, for instance, that swear words and laughter characterize young speakers' talk, while old speakers tend to produce more truncated words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-26T08:23:08Z) - Pick a Fight or Bite your Tongue: Investigation of Gender Differences in
Idiomatic Language Usage [9.892162266128306]
We compile a novel, large and diverse corpus of spontaneous linguistic productions annotated with speakers' gender.
We perform a first large-scale empirical study of distinctions in the usage of textitfigurative language between male and female authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-31T18:44:07Z) - Exploration of Gender Differences in COVID-19 Discourse on Reddit [4.402655234271756]
We show that gender-linked affective distinctions are amplified in social media postings involving emotionally-charged discourse related to COVID-19.
Our analysis also confirms considerable differences in topical preferences between male and female authors in spontaneous pandemic-related discussions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-13T06:29:24Z) - Multi-Dimensional Gender Bias Classification [67.65551687580552]
Machine learning models can inadvertently learn socially undesirable patterns when training on gender biased text.
We propose a general framework that decomposes gender bias in text along several pragmatic and semantic dimensions.
Using this fine-grained framework, we automatically annotate eight large scale datasets with gender information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T21:23:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.