Quantum nonlocality: How does nature do it?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06476v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 20:32:42 GMT
• Title: Quantum nonlocality: How does nature do it?
• Authors: Ad\'an Cabello
• Abstract summary: Hance and Hossenfelder argue that maintaining local causality requires violating statistical independence. Here, we recall that there is a third option, namely, rejecting that measurement outcomes are governed in any way by hidden variables. We argue that this third option is scientifically more plausible and answers the question of why and how nature produces quantum nonlocality.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In a recent note, Hance and Hossenfelder (arXiv:2211.01331) recall that "locally causal completions of quantum mechanics are possible, if they violate the assumption [called statistical independence or measurement independence] that the hidden variables do not in any way depend on measurement settings" and that, consequently, the experimental violations of Bell inequalities "show that maintaining local causality requires violating statistical independence". However, Hance and Hossenfelder also argue that "we should (...) look for independent experimental evidence that can distinguish the two different options: non-locality and statistical independence, or locality and violations of statistical independence" and that "the unwillingness to consider theories without statistical independence may be the reason we do not yet have a locally causal theory for the foundations of physics that is consistent with general relativity". Here, we recall that there is a third option, namely, rejecting that measurement outcomes are governed in any way by hidden variables. Moreover, we argue that some recent results in the search for principles singling out the sets of quantum correlations for Bell and Kochen-Specker contextuality scenarios point out that this third option is scientifically more plausible and answers the question of why and how nature produces quantum nonlocality.

Related papers

• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
  Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed. In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z)
• Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it? [0.0]
  This paper advocates the importance of contextuality, Einstein causality and global symmetries. The violation of Bell inequalities in physics and in cognitive science can be explained using the notion of Bohr contextuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T16:16:10Z)
• Experimental refutation of real-valued quantum mechanics under strict locality conditions [15.98149438495762]
  Physicists describe nature using mathematics as the natural language, and for quantum mechanics, it prefers to use complex numbers. Recently, it has been shown that a three-party correlation created in entanglement swapping scenarios cannot be reproduced using only real numbers. Our results violate the real number bound of 7.66 by 5.30 standard deviations, hence rejecting the universal validity of the real-valued quantum mechanics to describe nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T20:00:17Z)
• Supermeasured: Violating Bell-Statistical Independence without violating physical statistical independence [0.0]
  Bell's theorem is often said to imply that quantum mechanics violates local causality. This is only correct if the hidden-variables theory fulfils an assumption called Statistical Independence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T18:00:33Z)
• Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments [0.0]
  Bell inequalities rest on three fundamental assumptions: realism, locality, and free choice. We investigate the extent to which a given assumption needs to be relaxed for the other to hold at all costs. Despite their disparate character, we show that both assumptions are equally costly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T10:04:38Z)
• A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions [89.59955143854556]
  We propose a weaker assumption that we call $2$-adjacency faithfulness. We propose a sound orientation rule for causal discovery that applies under weaker assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:04:08Z)
• Is the Moon there if nobody looks: Bell Inequalities and Physical Reality [0.0]
  The violation of various Bell inequalities may neither justify the quantum nonlocality nor allow for doubt regarding the existence of atoms, electrons and other invisible elementary particles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T16:49:16Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• Using Randomness to decide among Locality, Realism and Ergodicity [91.3755431537592]
  An experiment is proposed to find out, or at least to get an indication about, which one is false. The results of such experiment would be important not only to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T19:26:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.