Supermeasured: Violating Bell-Statistical Independence without violating
physical statistical independence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07292v4
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:23:51 GMT
- Title: Supermeasured: Violating Bell-Statistical Independence without violating
physical statistical independence
- Authors: Jonte R. Hance, Sabine Hossenfelder, Tim N. Palmer
- Abstract summary: Bell's theorem is often said to imply that quantum mechanics violates local causality.
This is only correct if the hidden-variables theory fulfils an assumption called Statistical Independence.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Bell's theorem is often said to imply that quantum mechanics violates local
causality, and that local causality cannot be restored with a hidden-variables
theory. This however is only correct if the hidden-variables theory fulfils an
assumption called Statistical Independence. Violations of Statistical
Independence are commonly interpreted as correlations between the measurement
settings and the hidden variables (which determine the measurement outcomes).
Such correlations have been discarded as ``fine-tuning'' or a ``conspiracy''.
We here point out that the common interpretation is at best physically
ambiguous and at worst incorrect. The problem with the common interpretation is
that Statistical Independence might be violated because of a non-trivial
measure in state space, a possibility we propose to call ``supermeasured''. We
use Invariant Set Theory as an example of a supermeasured theory that violates
the Statistical Independence assumption in Bell's theorem without requiring
correlations between hidden variables and measurement settings (physical
statistical independence).
Related papers
- Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities [55.2480439325792]
Louis Sica derived Bell's inequalities from the hypothesis that the time series of outcomes observed in one station does not change if the setting in the other station is changed.
In this paper, Sica's approach is extended to series with non ideal efficiency and to the actual time structure of experimental data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T13:59:52Z) - Quantum Nonlocality: how does Nature do it? [0.0]
This paper advocates the importance of contextuality, Einstein causality and global symmetries.
The violation of Bell inequalities in physics and in cognitive science can be explained using the notion of Bohr contextuality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T16:16:10Z) - Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements.
This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance.
However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z) - Causal Discovery via Conditional Independence Testing with Proxy Variables [35.3493980628004]
The presence of unobserved variables, such as the latent confounder, can introduce bias in conditional independence testing.
We propose a novel hypothesis-testing procedure that can effectively examine the existence of the causal relationship over continuous variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-09T09:08:39Z) - Quantum nonlocality: How does nature do it? [0.0]
Hance and Hossenfelder argue that maintaining local causality requires violating statistical independence.
Here, we recall that there is a third option, namely, rejecting that measurement outcomes are governed in any way by hidden variables.
We argue that this third option is scientifically more plausible and answers the question of why and how nature produces quantum nonlocality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-11T20:32:42Z) - Relaxed Bell inequalities as a trade-off relation between measurement
dependence and hiddenness [0.0]
Quantum correlations that violate the Bell inequality cannot be explained by any (measurement independent) local hidden variable theory.
We introduce a quantification of hidden variables (hiddenness) and derive a new trade-off relation between the hiddenness and the measurement dependency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T14:29:30Z) - Comment on Causal Networks and Freedom of Choice in Bell's Theorem [0.0]
The independence of hidden and setting variables is called: freedom of choice, free will, measurement independence or no conspiracy.
By imbedding the Bell causal structure in a larger causal network the authors correctly prove, that one can explain and quantify possible violation of measurement independence without evoking the super-determinism.
We explain why freedom of choice should be called noncontextuality and why its violation in Bell Tests confirms only the contextual character of quantum observables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T22:53:00Z) - Counterfactual Invariance to Spurious Correlations: Why and How to Pass
Stress Tests [87.60900567941428]
A spurious correlation' is the dependence of a model on some aspect of the input data that an analyst thinks shouldn't matter.
In machine learning, these have a know-it-when-you-see-it character.
We study stress testing using the tools of causal inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-31T14:39:38Z) - Contextuality-by-Default description of Bell tests: Contextuality as the
rule not as an exception [0.0]
Bell inequalities are used to certify entanglement.
Quantum mechanics and behavioral sciences teach us that random variables measuring the same content may vary.
We prove that this model does not restrict experimenters freedom of choice which is a prerequisite of science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-23T12:30:53Z) - Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs.
We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables.
We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z) - A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions [89.59955143854556]
We propose a weaker assumption that we call $2$-adjacency faithfulness.
We propose a sound orientation rule for causal discovery that applies under weaker assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T13:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.