Evidence-based Match-status-Aware Gait Recognition for Out-of-Gallery Gait Identification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08007v4
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:18:57 GMT
- Title: Evidence-based Match-status-Aware Gait Recognition for Out-of-Gallery Gait Identification
- Abstract summary: We propose an Evidence-based Match-status-Aware Gait Recognition framework.
Inspired by Evidential Deep Learning (EDL), EMA-GR is designed to quantify the uncertainty associated with the match status of recognition.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods by a substantial margin.
- Score: 31.287312613939203
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Existing gait recognition methods typically identify individuals based on the similarity between probe and gallery samples. However, these methods often neglect the fact that the gallery may not contain identities corresponding to the probes, leading to incorrect recognition.To identify Out-of-Gallery (OOG) gait queries, we propose an Evidence-based Match-status-Aware Gait Recognition (EMA-GR) framework. Inspired by Evidential Deep Learning (EDL), EMA-GR is designed to quantify the uncertainty associated with the match status of recognition. Thus, EMA-GR identifies whether the probe has a counterpart in the gallery. Specifically, we adopt an evidence collector to gather match status evidence from a recognition result pair and parameterize a Dirichlet distribution over the gathered evidence, following the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence (DST). We measure the uncertainty and predict the match status of the recognition results, and thus determine whether the probe is an OOG query.To the best of our knowledge, our method is the first attempt to tackle OOG queries in gait recognition. Moreover, EMA-GR is agnostic against gait recognition methods and improves the robustness against OOG queries. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on datasets with OOG queries, and can also generalize well to other identity-retrieval tasks. Importantly, our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods by a substantial margin, achieving a 51.26% improvement when the OOG query rate is around 50% on OUMVLP.
Related papers
- MMGait: Benchmarking and Unifying Gait Recognition across Heterogeneous Modalities [31.890370751419425]
Human walking produces heterogeneous photometric, geometric, and motion cues that cannot be systematically examined with RGB-centered benchmarks.<n>We present MMGait, a large-scale multi-sensor benchmark that brings visible, infrared, depth, LiDAR, and radar observations into sequence-level correspondence.<n>We formulate Omni-Modal Gait Recognition, which unifies single-modal, cross-modal, and multi-modal recognition within a shared identity space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-10T14:23:29Z) - REVEAL: Reference-Grounded Reasoning for Multimodal Manipulation Detection [33.33464433821003]
Multimodal manipulation detection aims to simultaneously identify forged image--text pairs and localize tampered regions.<n>Inspired by human comparative reasoning, we reformulate this task as a reference-grounded verification problem.<n>We propose REVEAL, a framework explicitly designed for this comparative paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-27T13:24:41Z) - FIKA-Bench: From Fine-grained Recognition to Fine-Grained Knowledge Acquisition [54.31138496553705]
Fine-grained recognition in everyday life is often not a closed-book classification problem.<n>Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate visually recognition, leaving this active external knowledge acquisition ability underexplored.<n>We study fine-grained knowledge acquisition, where a system must seek, verify, and use external evidence to answer open-ended fine-grained recognition questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T08:49:51Z) - AEGIS: From Clues to Verdicts -- Graph-Guided Deep Vulnerability Reasoning via Dialectics and Meta-Auditing [9.271196825503417]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for vulnerability detection, yet their reasoning remains fundamentally unsound.<n>We present AEGIS, a novel multi-agent framework that shifts detection from ungrounded speculation to forensic verification over a closed factual substrate.<n>It reduces the false positive rate by up to 54.40% compared to leading baselines, at an average cost of $0.09 per sample without any task-specific training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-21T04:12:04Z) - URAG: A Benchmark for Uncertainty Quantification in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [35.441039437111606]
URAG is a benchmark designed to assess the uncertainty of RAG systems across various fields like healthcare, programming, science, math, and general text.<n>We apply the evaluation pipeline to 8 standard RAG methods, measuring their performance through both accuracy and prediction-set sizes based on LAC and APS metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T00:22:06Z) - TransFIRA: Transfer Learning for Face Image Recognizability Assessment [73.61309363885552]
TransFIRA is a lightweight and annotation-free framework that grounds recognizability directly in embedding space.<n>New extensions beyond faces include encoder-grounded explainability that reveals how degradations and subject-specific factors affect recognizability.<n> Experiments confirm state-of-the-art results on faces, strong robustness on body recognition, and under cross-dataset shifts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T18:16:21Z) - Enhancing Retrieval Augmentation via Adversarial Collaboration [50.117273835877334]
We propose the Adrial Collaboration RAG (AC-RAG) framework to address "Retrieval Hallucinations"<n>AC-RAG employs two heterogeneous agents: a generalist Detector that identifies knowledge gaps, and a domain-specialized Resolver that provides precise solutions.<n>Experiments show that AC-RAG significantly improves retrieval accuracy and outperforms state-of-the-art RAG methods across various vertical domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-18T08:54:20Z) - Mind the Gap: Bridging Occlusion in Gait Recognition via Residual Gap Correction [57.75544235445363]
We propose RG-Gait, a method for residual correction for occluded gait recognition with holistic retention.<n>Our proposed network adaptively integrates the learned residual, significantly improving performance on occluded gait sequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T04:45:14Z) - Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation [108.13261761812517]
We introduce FRANQ (Faithfulness-based Retrieval Augmented UNcertainty Quantification), a novel method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs.<n>We present a new long-form Question Answering (QA) dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T11:56:59Z) - SePer: Measure Retrieval Utility Through The Lens Of Semantic Perplexity Reduction [20.6787276745193]
We introduce an automatic evaluation method that measures retrieval quality through the lens of information gain within the RAG framework.
We quantify the utility of retrieval by the extent to which it reduces semantic perplexity post-retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T12:37:34Z) - Towards Copyright Protection for Knowledge Bases of Retrieval-augmented Language Models via Ownership Verification with Reasoning [58.57194301645823]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world applications through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mechanisms.
Existing methods that can be generalized as watermarking techniques to protect these knowledge bases typically involve poisoning attacks.
We propose name for harmless' copyright protection of knowledge bases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T09:15:56Z) - On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within
Knowledge-Intensive Application Domains [34.122040172188406]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been empirically shown to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive domains.
We show that RAG is vulnerable to universal poisoning attacks in medical Q&A.
We develop a new detection-based defense to ensure the safe use of RAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-12T02:43:40Z) - Distillation-guided Representation Learning for Unconstrained Gait Recognition [50.0533243584942]
We propose a framework, termed GAit DEtection and Recognition (GADER), for human authentication in challenging outdoor scenarios.
GADER builds discriminative features through a novel gait recognition method, where only frames containing gait information are used.
We evaluate our method on multiple State-of-The-Arts(SoTA) gait baselines and demonstrate consistent improvements on indoor and outdoor datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-27T01:53:57Z) - Decker: Double Check with Heterogeneous Knowledge for Commonsense Fact
Verification [80.31112722910787]
We propose Decker, a commonsense fact verification model that is capable of bridging heterogeneous knowledge.
Experimental results on two commonsense fact verification benchmark datasets, CSQA2.0 and CREAK demonstrate the effectiveness of our Decker.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T06:28:16Z) - Gait Recognition in the Wild: A Large-scale Benchmark and NAS-based
Baseline [95.88825497452716]
Gait benchmarks empower the research community to train and evaluate high-performance gait recognition systems.
GREW is the first large-scale dataset for gait recognition in the wild.
SPOSGait is the first NAS-based gait recognition model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T14:57:39Z) - RealGait: Gait Recognition for Person Re-Identification [79.67088297584762]
We construct a new gait dataset by extracting silhouettes from an existing video person re-identification challenge which consists of 1,404 persons walking in an unconstrained manner.
Our results suggest that recognizing people by their gait in real surveillance scenarios is feasible and the underlying gait pattern is probably the true reason why video person re-idenfification works in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-13T06:30:56Z) - Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems.
We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z) - The Proximal ID Algorithm [9.190358641395848]
Unobserved confounding is a fundamental obstacle to establishing valid causal conclusions from observational data.
We develop a synthesis of the former and latter approaches to identification in causal inference.
Our approach allows us to systematically exploit proxies to adjust for the presence of unobserved confounders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-15T21:32:47Z) - SelfGait: A Spatiotemporal Representation Learning Method for
Self-supervised Gait Recognition [24.156710529672775]
Gait recognition plays a vital role in human identification since gait is a unique biometric feature that can be perceived at a distance.
Existing gait recognition methods can learn gait features from gait sequences in different ways, but the performance of gait recognition suffers from labeled data.
We propose a self-supervised gait recognition method, termed SelfGait, which takes advantage of the massive, diverse, unlabeled gait data as a pre-training process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-27T05:15:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.