URAG: A Benchmark for Uncertainty Quantification in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19281v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:22:06 GMT
• Title: URAG: A Benchmark for Uncertainty Quantification in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: URAG is a benchmark designed to assess the uncertainty of RAG systems across various fields like healthcare, programming, science, math, and general text.<n>We apply the evaluation pipeline to 8 standard RAG methods, measuring their performance through both accuracy and prediction-set sizes based on LAC and APS metrics.
• Score: 35.441039437111606
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a widely adopted approach for enhancing LLMs in scenarios that demand extensive factual knowledge. However, current RAG evaluations concentrate primarily on correctness, which may not fully capture the impact of retrieval on LLM uncertainty and reliability. To bridge this gap, we introduce URAG, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess the uncertainty of RAG systems across various fields like healthcare, programming, science, math, and general text. By reformulating open-ended generation tasks into multiple-choice question answering, URAG allows for principled uncertainty quantification via conformal prediction. We apply the evaluation pipeline to 8 standard RAG methods, measuring their performance through both accuracy and prediction-set sizes based on LAC and APS metrics. Our analysis shows that (1) accuracy gains often coincide with reduced uncertainty, but this relationship breaks under retrieval noise; (2) simple modular RAG methods tend to offer better accuracy-uncertainty trade-offs than more complex reasoning pipelines; and (3) no single RAG approach is universally reliable across domains. We further show that (4) retrieval depth, parametric knowledge dependence, and exposure to confidence cues can amplify confident errors and hallucinations. Ultimately, URAG establishes a systematic benchmark for analyzing and enhancing the trustworthiness of retrieval-augmented systems. Our code is available on GitHub.

Related papers

• BalanceRAG: Joint Risk Calibration for Cascaded Retrieval-Augmented Generation [8.129733777508434]
  Large language models (LLMs) can enhance factuality via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>Applying RAG to every query is unnecessary when the model-only answer is reliable.<n>We develop BalanceRAG to certify threshold pairs at a target risk level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T16:38:55Z)
• BAPO: Boundary-Aware Policy Optimization for Reliable Agentic Search [72.87861928940929]
  Boundary-Aware Policy Optimization (BAPO) is a novel RL framework designed to cultivate reliable boundary awareness without compromising accuracy.<n>BAPO introduces two key components: (i) a group-based boundary-aware reward that encourages an IDK response only when the reasoning reaches its limit, and (ii) an adaptive reward modulator that strategically suspends this reward during early exploration, preventing the model from exploiting IDK as a shortcut.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:06:58Z)
• Improving Consistency in Retrieval-Augmented Systems with Group Similarity Rewards [14.535325886547112]
  RAG systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains where users expect outputs to be consistent across semantically equivalent queries.<n>Existing systems often exhibit significant inconsistencies due to variability in both the retriever and generator.<n>We introduce a principled evaluation framework that decomposes RAG consistency into retriever-level, generator-level, and end-to-end components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T23:14:13Z)
• Towards a rigorous evaluation of RAG systems: the challenge of due diligence [39.577682622066256]
  The rise of generative AI, has driven significant advancements in high-risk sectors like healthcare and finance.<n>The Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture, combining language models (LLMs) with search engines, is particularly notable for its ability to generate responses from document corpora.<n>This study evaluates a RAG system used in due diligence for an investment fund.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T12:33:16Z)
• Faithfulness-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Fact-Checking the Output of Retrieval Augmented Generation [108.13261761812517]
  We introduce FRANQ (Faithfulness-based Retrieval Augmented UNcertainty Quantification), a novel method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs.<n>We present a new long-form Question Answering (QA) dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T11:56:59Z)
• Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG [51.120170062795566]
  We propose Divide-Then-Align (DTA) to endow RAG systems with the ability to respond with "I don't know" when the query is out of the knowledge boundary.<n>DTA balances accuracy with appropriate abstention, enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T08:21:21Z)
• After Retrieval, Before Generation: Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in RAG [13.603907803297561]
  RAG systems face challenges in balancing internal (parametric) and external (retrieved) knowledge.<n>We propose the BRIDGE framework, which dynamically determines a comprehensive response strategy of large language models.<n>Experiments show BRIDGE outperforms baselines by 5-15% in accuracy while maintaining balanced performance across all scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T16:29:19Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  I propose a novel Comparative RAG system that introduces an evaluator module to bridge the gap between probabilistic RAG systems and deterministically verifiable responses.<n>This framework paves the way for more reliable and scalable question-answering applications in domains requiring high precision and verifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T16:52:06Z)
• Controlling Risk of Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Counterfactual Prompting Framework [77.45983464131977]
  We focus on how likely it is that a RAG model's prediction is incorrect, resulting in uncontrollable risks in real-world applications.<n>Our research identifies two critical latent factors affecting RAG's confidence in its predictions.<n>We develop a counterfactual prompting framework that induces the models to alter these factors and analyzes the effect on their answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T14:52:14Z)
• VERA: Validation and Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Systems [5.709401805125129]
  VERA is a framework designed to enhance the transparency and reliability of outputs from large language models (LLMs) We show how VERA can strengthen decision-making processes and trust in AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T21:59:59Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.