Participation Interfaces for Human-Centered AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08419v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 18:57:34 GMT
• Title: Participation Interfaces for Human-Centered AI
• Authors: Sean McGregor
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces interactive visual "participation interfaces" for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and collaborative ranking problems as examples restoring a human-centered locus of control.
• Score: 6.85316573653194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) applications often balance the preferences and impacts among diverse and contentious stakeholder groups. Accommodating these stakeholder groups during system design, development, and deployment requires tools for the elicitation of disparate system interests and collaboration interfaces supporting negotiation balancing those interests. This paper introduces interactive visual "participation interfaces" for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and collaborative ranking problems as examples restoring a human-centered locus of control.

Related papers

• Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
  We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike. We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z)
• Visual-Geometric Collaborative Guidance for Affordance Learning [63.038406948791454]
  We propose a visual-geometric collaborative guided affordance learning network that incorporates visual and geometric cues. Our method outperforms the representative models regarding objective metrics and visual quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T07:35:51Z)
• Confronting Project Conflicts into Success: a Complex Systems Design Approach to Resolving Stalemates [0.0]
  In today's complex projects development, stakeholders are often involved too late. A purely associative and a-priori design-supported approach integrates both system's reality and stakeholder's interests. The state-of-the-art Preferendus is deployed to co-creatively generate a best-fit-for-common-purpose solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T07:44:43Z)
• Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models [49.74265453289855]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now accessible to anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection via browser-based interfaces. This paper examines the affordances of interactive feedback features in ChatGPT's interface, analysing how they shape user input and participation in iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T13:50:37Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Towards Multifaceted Human-Centered AI [9.95226150616764]
  Human-centered AI involve stakeholders with multiple roles interacting with each other and automated agents to accomplish diverse tasks. In this paper, we call for a holistic view when designing support mechanisms, such as interaction paradigms, and systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T19:56:47Z)
• Rethinking Trajectory Prediction via "Team Game" [118.59480535826094]
  We present a novel formulation for multi-agent trajectory prediction, which explicitly introduces the concept of interactive group consensus. On two multi-agent settings, i.e. team sports and pedestrians, the proposed framework consistently achieves superior performance compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T07:16:44Z)
• Automatic Context-Driven Inference of Engagement in HMI: A Survey [6.479224589451863]
  This paper presents a survey on engagement inference for human-machine interaction. It entails interdisciplinary definition, engagement components and factors, publicly available datasets, ground truth assessment, and most commonly used features and methods. It serves as a guide for the development of future human-machine interaction interfaces with reliable context-aware engagement inference capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T10:46:13Z)
• Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support [18.148737010217953]
  We conduct interviews and workshops with AI practitioners to identify practitioners' processes, challenges, and needs for support. We find that practitioners face challenges when choosing performance metrics, identifying the most relevant direct stakeholders and demographic groups. We identify impacts on fairness work stemming from a lack of engagement with direct stakeholders, business imperatives that prioritize customers over marginalized groups, and the drive to deploy AI systems at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T17:14:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.