Realigned Hardy's Paradox
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13642v1
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:45:39 GMT
- Title: Realigned Hardy's Paradox
- Authors: Shuai Zhao, Qing Zhou, Si-Ran Zhao, Xin-Yu Xu, Wen-Zhao Liu, Li Li,
Nai-Le Liu, Qiang Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen, Kai Chen
- Abstract summary: Hardy's paradox certifies that quantum mechanics cannot be completely described by local realistic theory.
We propose a realigned Hardy's paradox to overcome this problem.
One can anticipate that the realigned Hardy's paradox can tolerate more experimental imperfections.
- Score: 18.40864487417613
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Hardy's paradox provides an all-versus-nothing fashion to directly certify
that quantum mechanics cannot be completely described by local realistic
theory. However, when considering potential imperfections in experiments, like
imperfect entanglement source and low detection efficiency, the original
Hardy's paradox may induce a rather small Hardy violation and only be realized
by expensive quantum systems. To overcome this problem, we propose a realigned
Hardy's paradox. Compared with the original version of Hardy's paradox, the
realigned Hardy's paradox can dramatically improve the Hardy violation. Then,
we generalize the realigned Hardy's paradox to arbitrary even $n$ dichotomic
measurements. For $n=2$ and $n=4$ cases, the realigned Hardy's paradox can
achieve Hardy values $P(00|A_1B_1)$ approximate $0.4140$ and $0.7734$
respectively compared with $0.09$ of the original Hardy's paradox. Meanwhile,
the structure of the realigned Hardy's paradox is simpler and more robust in
the sense that there is only one Hardy condition rather than three conditions.
One can anticipate that the realigned Hardy's paradox can tolerate more
experimental imperfections and stimulate more fascinating quantum information
applications.
Related papers
- Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation [14.739680143001086]
Hardy's paradox is celebrated to be the simplest form of Bell's theorem concerning its "All versus Nothing" way to test local realism.
Here, we experimentally demonstrate Hardy's nonlocality through a photonic entanglement source.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T14:54:19Z) - Broken arrows: Hardy-Unruh chains and quantum contextuality [0.0]
Quantum mechanics avoids broken 'if... then...' arrows because it cannot simultaneously assign truth values to all conditionals involved.
We use the framework inspired by Bub and Pitowsky (1989) and developed in Janas, Cuffaro and Janssen (2022) to analyze Hardy-Unruh chains in terms of fictitious bananas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-27T16:17:47Z) - Rigorous derivation of the Efimov effect in a simple model [68.8204255655161]
We consider a system of three identical bosons in $mathbbR3$ with two-body zero-range interactions and a three-body hard-core repulsion of a given radius $a>0$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-21T10:11:28Z) - Experimental implementation of Hardy-like quantum pigeonhole paradoxes [5.141645431801557]
We present the general Hardy-like quantum pigeonhole paradoxes for textitn-particle states.
Several kinds of Hardy-like quantum pigeonhole paradoxes can even give rise to higher success probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-06T02:46:40Z) - Tight Exponential Analysis for Smoothing the Max-Relative Entropy and
for Quantum Privacy Amplification [56.61325554836984]
The max-relative entropy together with its smoothed version is a basic tool in quantum information theory.
We derive the exact exponent for the decay of the small modification of the quantum state in smoothing the max-relative entropy based on purified distance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T16:35:41Z) - Linear Contextual Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions [91.38793800392108]
We study the linear contextual bandit problem in the presence of adversarial corruption.
We present a variance-aware algorithm that is adaptive to the level of adversarial contamination $C$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-25T02:53:24Z) - Annihilating Entanglement Between Cones [77.34726150561087]
We show that Lorentz cones are the only cones with a symmetric base for which a certain stronger version of the resilience property is satisfied.
Our proof exploits the symmetries of the Lorentz cones and applies two constructions resembling protocols for entanglement distillation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T15:02:39Z) - Hardy-like Quantum Pigeonhole Paradox and the Projected-Coloring Graph
State [0.0]
A Hardy-like version of the quantum pigeonhole paradox is proposed, which can also be considered as a special kind of Hardy's paradox.
Some Hardy-like quantum pigeonhole paradoxes can even set a new record for the success of demonstrating Bell nonlocality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-15T08:01:17Z) - A Weaker Faithfulness Assumption based on Triple Interactions [89.59955143854556]
We propose a weaker assumption that we call $2$-adjacency faithfulness.
We propose a sound orientation rule for causal discovery that applies under weaker assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T13:04:08Z) - Curse of Dimensionality on Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable
Robustness [151.67113334248464]
We show that extending the smoothing technique to defend against other attack models can be challenging.
We present experimental results on CIFAR to validate our theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-08T22:02:14Z) - Orbital-angular-momentum-based experimental test of Hardy's paradox for
multisetting and multidimensional systems [0.5219568203653523]
We report the first experiment to demonstrate the Hardy's paradox for multiple settings and multiple outcomes.
We showcase the nonlocality with an experimentally recording probability of 36.77% for five-setting three-dimensional OAM subspace.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-17T11:31:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.