How We Express Ourselves Freely: Censorship, Self-censorship, and
Anti-censorship on a Chinese Social Media
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13748v1
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 18:28:16 GMT
- Title: How We Express Ourselves Freely: Censorship, Self-censorship, and
Anti-censorship on a Chinese Social Media
- Authors: Xiang Chen, Jiamu Xie, Zixin Wang, Bohui Shen, Zhixuan Zhou
- Abstract summary: We identify the metrics of censorship and self-censorship, find the influence factors, and construct a mediation model to measure their relationship.
Based on these findings, we discuss implications for democratic social media design and future censorship research.
- Score: 4.408128846525362
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Censorship, anti-censorship, and self-censorship in an authoritarian regime
have been extensively studies, yet the relationship between these intertwined
factors is not well understood. In this paper, we report results of a
large-scale survey study (N = 526) with Sina Weibo users toward bridging this
research gap. Through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and
regression analysis, we uncover how users are being censored, how and why they
conduct self-censorship on different topics and in different scenarios (i.e.,
post, repost, and comment), and their various anti-censorship strategies. We
further identify the metrics of censorship and self-censorship, find the
influence factors, and construct a mediation model to measure their
relationship. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for democratic
social media design and future censorship research.
Related papers
- DeMod: A Holistic Tool with Explainable Detection and Personalized Modification for Toxicity Censorship [16.55929590079875]
This study investigates people's diverse needs in toxicity censorship and builds a ChatGPT-based censorship tool named DeMod accordingly.
DeMod is equipped with the features of explainable Detection and personalized Modification, providing fine-grained detection results, detailed explanations, and personalized modification suggestions.
The results suggest DeMod's multiple strengths like the richness of functionality, the accuracy of censorship, and ease of use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T06:38:43Z) - Pathfinder: Exploring Path Diversity for Assessing Internet Censorship Inconsistency [8.615061541238589]
We investigate Internet censorship from a different perspective by scrutinizing the diverse censorship deployment inside a country.
We reveal that the diversity of Internet censorship caused by different routing paths inside a country is prevalent.
We identify that different hosting platforms also result in inconsistent censorship activities due to different peering relationships with the ISPs in a country.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T01:48:31Z) - Understanding Routing-Induced Censorship Changes Globally [5.79183660559872]
We investigate the extent to which Equal-cost Multi-path (ECMP) routing is the cause for inconsistencies in censorship results.
We find ECMP routing significantly changes observed censorship across protocols, censor mechanisms, and in 17 countries.
Our work points to methods for improving future studies, reducing inconsistencies and increasing repeatability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T16:21:31Z) - User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search.
We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results.
More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z) - Aggression and "hate speech" in communication of media users: analysis
of control capabilities [50.591267188664666]
Authors studied the possibilities of mutual influence of users in new media.
They found a high level of aggression and hate speech when discussing an urgent social problem - measures for COVID-19 fighting.
Results can be useful for developing media content in a modern digital environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-25T15:53:32Z) - Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias
Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations.
We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity.
Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Is radicalization reinforced by social media censorship? [0.0]
Radicalized beliefs, such as those tied to QAnon, Russiagate, and other political conspiracy theories, can lead some individuals and groups to engage in violent behavior.
This article presents and agent-based model of a social media network that enables investigation of the effects of censorship on the amount of dissenting information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T21:07:34Z) - Country Image in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of China [79.17323278601869]
Country image has a profound influence on international relations and economic development.
In the worldwide outbreak of COVID-19, countries and their people display different reactions.
In this study, we take China as a specific and typical case and investigate its image with aspect-based sentiment analysis on a large-scale Twitter dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-12T15:54:51Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z) - Linguistic Fingerprints of Internet Censorship: the Case of SinaWeibo [4.544151613454639]
This paper studies how the linguistic components of blogposts might affect the blogposts' likelihood of being censored.
We build a classifier that significantly outperforms non-expert humans in predicting whether a blogpost will be censored.
Our work suggests that it is possible to use linguistic properties of social media posts to automatically predict if they are going to be censored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-23T23:08:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.