Pathfinder: Exploring Path Diversity for Assessing Internet Censorship Inconsistency
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04213v1
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 01:48:31 GMT
- Title: Pathfinder: Exploring Path Diversity for Assessing Internet Censorship Inconsistency
- Authors: Xiaoqin Liang, Guannan Liu, Lin Jin, Shuai Hao, Haining Wang,
- Abstract summary: We investigate Internet censorship from a different perspective by scrutinizing the diverse censorship deployment inside a country.
We reveal that the diversity of Internet censorship caused by different routing paths inside a country is prevalent.
We identify that different hosting platforms also result in inconsistent censorship activities due to different peering relationships with the ISPs in a country.
- Score: 8.615061541238589
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Internet censorship is typically enforced by authorities to achieve information control for a certain group of Internet users. So far existing censorship studies have primarily focused on country-level characterization because (1) in many cases, censorship is enabled by governments with nationwide policies and (2) it is usually hard to control how the probing packets are routed to trigger censorship in different networks inside a country. However, the deployment and implementation of censorship could be highly diverse at the ISP level. In this paper, we investigate Internet censorship from a different perspective by scrutinizing the diverse censorship deployment inside a country. Specifically, by leveraging an end-to-end measurement framework, we deploy multiple geo-distributed back-end control servers to explore various paths from one single vantage point. The generated traffic with the same domain but different control servers' IPs could be forced to traverse different transit networks, thereby being examined by different censorship devices if present. Through our large-scale experiments and in-depth investigation, we reveal that the diversity of Internet censorship caused by different routing paths inside a country is prevalent, implying that (1) the implementations of centralized censorship are commonly incomplete or flawed and (2) decentralized censorship is also common. Moreover, we identify that different hosting platforms also result in inconsistent censorship activities due to different peering relationships with the ISPs in a country. Finally, we present extensive case studies in detail to illustrate the configurations that lead to censorship inconsistency and explore the causes.
Related papers
- Understanding Routing-Induced Censorship Changes Globally [5.79183660559872]
We investigate the extent to which Equal-cost Multi-path (ECMP) routing is the cause for inconsistencies in censorship results.
We find ECMP routing significantly changes observed censorship across protocols, censor mechanisms, and in 17 countries.
Our work points to methods for improving future studies, reducing inconsistencies and increasing repeatability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T16:21:31Z) - SADAS: A Dialogue Assistant System Towards Remediating Norm Violations
in Bilingual Socio-Cultural Conversations [56.31816995795216]
Socially-Aware Dialogue Assistant System (SADAS) is designed to ensure that conversations unfold with respect and understanding.
Our system's novel architecture includes: (1) identifying the categories of norms present in the dialogue, (2) detecting potential norm violations, (3) evaluating the severity of these violations, and (4) implementing targeted remedies to rectify the breaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T08:54:21Z) - User Attitudes to Content Moderation in Web Search [49.1574468325115]
We examine the levels of support for different moderation practices applied to potentially misleading and/or potentially offensive content in web search.
We find that the most supported practice is informing users about potentially misleading or offensive content, and the least supported one is the complete removal of search results.
More conservative users and users with lower levels of trust in web search results are more likely to be against content moderation in web search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T10:57:15Z) - Measuring and Evading Turkmenistan's Internet Censorship: A Case Study
in Large-Scale Measurements of a Low-Penetration Country [16.32681366389081]
Turkmenistan has been listed as one of the few Internet enemies by Reporters without Borders.
With a population of only six million people and an Internet penetration rate of only 38%, it is challenging to conduct remote network measurements at scale.
We present the largest measurement study to date of Turkmenistan's Web censorship.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T19:44:28Z) - Augmenting Rule-based DNS Censorship Detection at Scale with Machine
Learning [38.00013408742201]
Censorship of the domain name system (DNS) is a key mechanism used across different countries.
In this paper, we explore how machine learning (ML) models can help streamline the detection process.
We find that unsupervised models, trained solely on uncensored instances, can identify new instances and variations of censorship missed by existing probes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T23:36:30Z) - Countering Malicious Content Moderation Evasion in Online Social
Networks: Simulation and Detection of Word Camouflage [64.78260098263489]
Twisting and camouflaging keywords are among the most used techniques to evade platform content moderation systems.
This article contributes significantly to countering malicious information by developing multilingual tools to simulate and detect new methods of evasion of content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-27T16:08:49Z) - How We Express Ourselves Freely: Censorship, Self-censorship, and
Anti-censorship on a Chinese Social Media [4.408128846525362]
We identify the metrics of censorship and self-censorship, find the influence factors, and construct a mediation model to measure their relationship.
Based on these findings, we discuss implications for democratic social media design and future censorship research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-24T18:28:16Z) - Detecting Network-based Internet Censorship via Latent Feature
Representation Learning [4.862220550600935]
We design and evaluate a classification model based on latent feature representation learning and an image-based classification model to detect network-based Internet censorship.
To infer latent feature representations from network reachability data, we propose a sequence-to-sequence autoencoder.
To estimate the probability of censorship events from the inferred latent features, we rely on a densely connected multi-layer neural network model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-12T11:16:26Z) - Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal.
Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.