Web-based Management Information System of Cases Filed with the National Labor Relations Commission

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14452v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:30:01 GMT
• Title: Web-based Management Information System of Cases Filed with the National Labor Relations Commission
• Abstract summary: This study was developed to describe the daily operations and encountered problems of the National Labor Relations Commission Regional Arbitration Branch No. IV (NLRC RAB IV) through conducted observations and interviews. The research methodology utilized in this project was the descriptive developmental approach. The system covered managing filed complaints, Single-Entry Approach (SEnA), labor cases, and report generation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study was developed to describe the daily operations and encountered problems of the National Labor Relations Commission Regional Arbitration Branch No. IV (NLRC RAB IV) through conducted observations and interviews. These problems were addressed and analyzed to be the features of the developed web-based management information system (MIS) for cases. The research methodology utilized in this project was the descriptive developmental approach. The Agile Software Development methodology was followed to develop the system. It was used to quickly produce the desired output while allowing the user to go back through phases without finishing the whole cycle. The system covered managing filed complaints, Single-Entry Approach (SEnA), labor cases, and report generation. The findings, through the interview, of handling records were inconsistent and inaccurate. This study also focused on ensuring the Data Privacy Act of 2012, protecting the database's information using the XOR Cipher Algorithm. This study was evaluated using standard web evaluation criteria. Using the criteria, the study's overall mean was 4.27 and 4.43, with the descriptive meaning of Very Good, which showed that the system was accepted as perceived by experts and end-users, respectively. Management of filed cases is a vital process for the Commission. With that said, developing a web-based management information system could ease the internal operations of handling and managing filed labor cases. Moreover, respondents and complainants can easily determine their filed cases' status using the case status tracking system. For further improvements to the system, additional printable documents may be added that could be found needed by the Commission. Lastly, further research about the effectiveness of the web-based system may be conducted for further enhancements of the system.

Related papers

• Learning When Not to Decide: A Framework for Overcoming Factual Presumptuousness in AI Adjudication [4.991125406994611]
  A well-known limitation of AI systems is the tendency to provide confident answers when information may be lacking.<n>This challenge is particularly acute in legal applications, where a core task for attorneys, judges, and administrators is to determine whether evidence is sufficient to reach a conclusion.<n>We study this problem in the important setting of unemployment insurance adjudication, which has seen rapid integration of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T18:17:08Z)
• Agents of Chaos [50.53354213047402]
  We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment.<n>Twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions.<n>Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:28:48Z)
• Automating Document Intelligence in Statutory City Planning [0.0]
  UK planning authorities face a legislative conflict between the Planning Act, which mandates public access to application documents, and the Data Protection Act, which requires protection of personal information.<n>This paper presents an integrated AI system designed to address these challenges.<n>The system automates the identification and redaction of personal information, extracts key metadata from planning documents, and analyzes architectural drawings for specified features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T15:19:12Z)
• OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment [63.662126457336534]
  OpenNovelty is an agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis.<n>It grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments.<n>OpenNovelty aims to empower the research community with a scalable tool that promotes fair, consistent, and evidence-backed peer review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T15:48:51Z)
• Let the Barbarians In: How AI Can Accelerate Systems Performance Research [80.43506848683633]
  We term this iterative cycle of generation, evaluation, and refinement AI-Driven Research for Systems.<n>We demonstrate that ADRS-generated solutions can match or even outperform human state-of-the-art designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T18:51:23Z)
• Cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en robótica y sistemas autónomos: una revisión sistemática de la literatura [0.0]
  This systematic literature review analyzes the current state of compliance with Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 in autonomous robotic systems.<n>Using the PRISMA protocol, 22 studies were selected from 243 initial records across IEEE Xplore, ACM DL, Scopus, and Web of Science.<n>Findings reveal partial regulatory alignment, but significant gaps persist in explainability modules, real-time human oversight, and knowledge base traceability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T20:56:33Z)
• Does Machine Unlearning Truly Remove Model Knowledge? A Framework for Auditing Unlearning in LLMs [58.24692529185971]
  We introduce a comprehensive auditing framework for unlearning evaluation comprising three benchmark datasets, six unlearning algorithms, and five prompt-based auditing methods.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of different unlearning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T09:19:07Z)
• Divide-Then-Align: Honest Alignment based on the Knowledge Boundary of RAG [51.120170062795566]
  We propose Divide-Then-Align (DTA) to endow RAG systems with the ability to respond with "I don't know" when the query is out of the knowledge boundary.<n>DTA balances accuracy with appropriate abstention, enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T08:21:21Z)
• InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [63.55258191625131]
  InfoDeepSeek is a new benchmark for assessing agentic information seeking in real-world, dynamic web environments.<n>We propose a systematic methodology for constructing challenging queries satisfying the criteria of determinacy, difficulty, and diversity.<n>We develop the first evaluation framework tailored to dynamic agentic information seeking, including fine-grained metrics about the accuracy, utility, and compactness of information seeking outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T14:44:40Z)
• The Great Data Standoff: Researchers vs. Platforms Under the Digital Services Act [9.275892768167122]
  We focus on the 2024 Romanian presidential election interference incident.<n>This is the first event of its kind to trigger systemic risk investigations by the European Commission.<n>By analysing this incident, we can comprehend election-related systemic risk to explore practical research tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T09:00:19Z)
• From Past to Present: A Survey of Malicious URL Detection Techniques, Datasets and Code Repositories [3.323388021979584]
  Malicious URLs persistently threaten the cybersecurity ecosystem, by either deceiving users into divulging private data or distributing harmful payloads to infiltrate host systems. This review systematically analyzes methods from traditional blacklisting to advanced deep learning approaches. Unlike prior surveys, we propose a novel modality-based taxonomy that categorizes existing works according to their primary data modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T06:23:18Z)
• Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey [59.26328612791924]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has quickly grown into a pivotal paradigm in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a unified framework that assesses the trustworthiness of RAG systems across six key dimensions: factuality, robustness, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T09:06:44Z)
• SUPER: Evaluating Agents on Setting Up and Executing Tasks from Research Repositories [55.161075901665946]
  Super aims to capture the realistic challenges faced by researchers working with Machine Learning (ML) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) research repositories. Our benchmark comprises three distinct problem sets: 45 end-to-end problems with annotated expert solutions, 152 sub problems derived from the expert set that focus on specific challenges, and 602 automatically generated problems for larger-scale development. We show that state-of-the-art approaches struggle to solve these problems with the best model (GPT-4o) solving only 16.3% of the end-to-end set, and 46.1% of the scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T17:37:48Z)
• Automatic Information Extraction From Employment Tribunal Judgements Using Large Language Models [0.4810407297181484]
  This paper presents a study on the application of GPT-4, a large language model, for automatic information extraction from UK employment tribunal cases. We meticulously evaluated GPT-4's performance in extracting critical information with a manual verification process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T17:43:08Z)
• Pitfalls in Language Models for Code Intelligence: A Taxonomy and Survey [21.01561950216472]
  Modern language models (LMs) have been successfully employed in source code generation and understanding. Despite their great potential, language models for code intelligence (LM4Code) are susceptible to potential pitfalls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T05:32:57Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Weakly Supervised Anomaly Detection: A Survey [75.26180038443462]
  Anomaly detection (AD) is a crucial task in machine learning with various applications. We present the first comprehensive survey of weakly supervised anomaly detection (WSAD) methods. For each setting, we provide formal definitions, key algorithms, and potential future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T10:27:21Z)
• Web-based Database Courses E-Learning Application [0.0]
  This study was focused on the development of a web e-learning application for the database courses taken by Information Technology (IT) students at the College of Information and Communications Technology of Bulacan State University (BulSU) The Agile Software Development methodology was followed phase by phase, up to the development phase, to develop the system. The application contains quizzes and examinations to allow self-assessment of learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T06:40:24Z)
• Mining Root Cause Knowledge from Cloud Service Incident Investigations for AIOps [71.12026848664753]
  Root Cause Analysis (RCA) of any service-disrupting incident is one of the most critical as well as complex tasks in IT processes. In this work, we present ICA and the downstream Incident Search and Retrieval based RCA pipeline, built at Salesforce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T02:33:34Z)
• System Cards for AI-Based Decision-Making for Public Policy [5.076419064097733]
  This work proposes a system accountability benchmark for formal audits of artificial intelligence-based decision-aiding systems. It consists of 56 criteria organized within a four-by-four matrix composed of rows focused on (i) data, (ii) model, (iii) code, (iv) system, and columns focused on (a) development, (b) assessment, (c) mitigation, and (d) assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T18:56:45Z)
• Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering [92.45607094299181]
  We make the first study to explore the correlation between user behavior and passage relevance. Our approach significantly improves the accuracy of passage ranking without extra human labeled data. In practice, this work has proved effective to substantially reduce the human labeling cost for the QA service in a global commercial search engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T07:02:08Z)
• Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing [8.155332346712424]
  We introduce a framework for algorithmic auditing that supports artificial intelligence system development end-to-end. The proposed auditing framework is intended to close the accountability gap in the development and deployment of large-scale artificial intelligence systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-03T20:19:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.