Related papers: Cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en robótica y sistemas autónomos: una revisión sistemática de la literatura

Related papers

From Reactive to Proactive: A Multi-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of 480 AI Incidents and a Data-Driven Governance Compliance Framework [0.0]
The study presents a cross empirical analysis of 480 realworld AI incidents from the AI Incident Database.<n>The results reveal substantial governance gaps, indicating persistent weaknesses in post-deployment accountability.<n>The study proposes the Proactive AI Governance Compliance Framework (PAGCF) to shift governance from reactive incident response toward pre-deployment compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-10T21:22:55Z)
Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks [46.32011684548212]
AI agents are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection, in which malicious instructions embedded in untrusted data can trigger dangerous agent actions.<n>This position paper discusses our vision for system-level defenses against indirect prompt injection attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-31T17:15:46Z)
Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections [53.468443050795344]
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has led to a dynamic regulatory landscape.<n>As AI paradigms shift towards greater autonomy, specifically in the form of agentic AI, it becomes increasingly challenging to articulate regulatory stipulations.<n>This paper reviews the evolving European Union (EU) AI regulatory provisions via analyzing 24 relevant documents published between 2024 and 2025.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T13:50:52Z)
Mapping AI Risk Mitigations: Evidence Scan and Preliminary AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy [35.22340964134219]
The landscape of AI risk mitigation frameworks is fragmented, uses inconsistent terminology, and has gaps in coverage.<n>This paper introduces a preliminary AI Risk Mitigation Taxonomy to organize AI risk mitigations and provide a common frame of reference.<n>The taxonomy was developed through a rapid evidence scan of 13 AI risk mitigation frameworks published between 2023-2025, which were extracted into a living database of 831 AI risk mitigations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T03:26:29Z)
Zero-shot reasoning for simulating scholarly peer-review [0.0]
We investigate a deterministic simulation framework that provides the first stable, evidence-based standard for evaluating AI-generated peer review reports.<n>First, the system is able to simulate calibrated editorial judgment, with 'Revise' decisions consistently forming the majority outcome.<n>Second, it maintains unwavering procedural integrity, enforcing a stable 29% evidence-anchoring compliance rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T13:59:14Z)
Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned [45.44933002008943]
This white paper presents the T"UV AUSTRIA Trusted AI framework.<n>It is an end-to-end audit catalog and methodology for assessing and certifying machine learning systems.<n>Building on three pillars - Secure Software Development, Functional Requirements, and Ethics & Data Privacy - it translates the high-level obligations of the EU AI Act into specific, testable criteria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T17:52:08Z)
Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
AI-Based Software Vulnerability Detection: A Systematic Literature Review [6.604556571951421]
This study presents a systematic review of software vulnerability detection (SVD) research from 2018 to 2023.<n>Our analysis reveals that 91% of studies use AI-based methods, with graph-based models being the most prevalent.<n>We identify key limitations, including dataset quality, interpretability, and highlight emerging opportunities in underexplored techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T01:42:38Z)
Does Machine Unlearning Truly Remove Model Knowledge? A Framework for Auditing Unlearning in LLMs [58.24692529185971]
We introduce a comprehensive auditing framework for unlearning evaluation comprising three benchmark datasets, six unlearning algorithms, and five prompt-based auditing methods.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of different unlearning strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T09:19:07Z)
AI-Supported Platform for System Monitoring and Decision-Making in Nuclear Waste Management with Large Language Models [1.6795461001108096]
This paper presents a multi-agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system that integrates large language models (LLMs) with document retrieval mechanisms.<n>The system ensures regulatory decisions remain factually grounded, dynamically adapting to evolving regulatory frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T20:29:53Z)
On the Security Risks of ML-based Malware Detection Systems: A Survey [40.831924021306506]
Malware presents a persistent threat to user privacy and data integrity.<n>To combat this, machine learning-based (ML-based) malware detection (MD) systems have been developed.<n>These systems have increasingly been attacked in recent years, undermining their effectiveness in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T06:15:31Z)
Aportes para el cumplimiento del Reglamento (UE) 2024/1689 en robótica y sistemas autónomos [0.461803711540329]
This work analyzes cybersecurity tools applicable to advanced robotic systems.<n>A list of basic tools is proposed to guarantee the security, integrity, and resilience of these systems.<n>Ten evaluation criteria are defined to ensure compliance with the regulation and reduce risks in human-robot interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-22T11:04:42Z)
Cybersecurity in Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Systems: A Systematic Review [1.1827829754757404]
We identified and reviewed 133 V2G cybersecurity studies.<n>Most studies focused on protecting V2G systems against cyber threats.<n>Only seven studies addressed the recovery aspect of the CRML function.<n>None have focused on the linkage between the behaviour of EV users and the cybersecurity of V2G systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T22:55:40Z)
CryptoFormalEval: Integrating LLMs and Formal Verification for Automated Cryptographic Protocol Vulnerability Detection [41.94295877935867]
We introduce a benchmark to assess the ability of Large Language Models to autonomously identify vulnerabilities in new cryptographic protocols. We created a dataset of novel, flawed, communication protocols and designed a method to automatically verify the vulnerabilities found by the AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T14:16:55Z)
AI in Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis [0.0]
This study examines 1,903 articles from Google Scholar and Web of Science, with 54 studies selected through PRISMA guidelines.<n>Our findings reveal that ML models, including Random Forest, XGBoost, and hybrid approaches, significantly enhance risk prediction accuracy and adaptability in post-pandemic contexts.<n>The study underscores the necessity of dynamic strategies, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous model evaluation to address challenges such as data quality and interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T17:47:51Z)
Testing learning-enabled cyber-physical systems with Large-Language Models: A Formal Approach [32.15663640443728]
The integration of machine learning (ML) into cyber-physical systems (CPS) offers significant benefits. Existing verification and validation techniques are often inadequate for these new paradigms. We propose a roadmap to transition from foundational probabilistic testing to a more rigorous approach capable of delivering formal assurance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T14:56:14Z)
The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.