ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09292v1
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 08:15:16 GMT
- Title: ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?
- Authors: Teo Susnjak
- Abstract summary: This study evaluated the ability of ChatGPT, a recently developed artificial intelligence (AI) agent, to perform high-level cognitive tasks.
It raises concerns about the potential use of ChatGPT as a tool for academic misconduct in online exams.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This study evaluated the ability of ChatGPT, a recently developed artificial
intelligence (AI) agent, to perform high-level cognitive tasks and produce text
that is indistinguishable from human-generated text. This capacity raises
concerns about the potential use of ChatGPT as a tool for academic misconduct
in online exams. The study found that ChatGPT is capable of exhibiting critical
thinking skills and generating highly realistic text with minimal input, making
it a potential threat to the integrity of online exams, particularly in
tertiary education settings where such exams are becoming more prevalent.
Returning to invigilated and oral exams could form part of the solution, while
using advanced proctoring techniques and AI-text output detectors may be
effective in addressing this issue, they are not likely to be foolproof
solutions. Further research is needed to fully understand the implications of
large language models like ChatGPT and to devise strategies for combating the
risk of cheating using these tools. It is crucial for educators and
institutions to be aware of the possibility of ChatGPT being used for cheating
and to investigate measures to address it in order to maintain the fairness and
validity of online exams for all students.
Related papers
- ChatGPT in Research and Education: Exploring Benefits and Threats [1.9466452723529557]
ChatGPT is a powerful language model developed by OpenAI.
It offers personalized feedback, enhances accessibility, enables interactive conversations, assists with lesson preparation and evaluation, and introduces new methods for teaching complex subjects.
ChatGPT also poses challenges to traditional education and research systems.
These challenges include the risk of cheating on online exams, the generation of human-like text that may compromise academic integrity, and difficulties in assessing the reliability of information generated by AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-05T05:29:00Z) - Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples.
One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports.
Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z) - DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmith [63.8746084667206]
We propose an effective ChatGPT detector named DEMASQ, which accurately identifies ChatGPT-generated content.
Our method addresses two critical factors: (i) the distinct biases in text composition observed in human- and machine-generated content and (ii) the alterations made by humans to evade previous detection methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T21:13:05Z) - Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection:
A Survey [97.33926242130732]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses.
Despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs.
To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T18:11:32Z) - Is ChatGPT Involved in Texts? Measure the Polish Ratio to Detect
ChatGPT-Generated Text [48.36706154871577]
We introduce a novel dataset termed HPPT (ChatGPT-polished academic abstracts)
It diverges from extant corpora by comprising pairs of human-written and ChatGPT-polished abstracts instead of purely ChatGPT-generated texts.
We also propose the "Polish Ratio" method, an innovative measure of the degree of modification made by ChatGPT compared to the original human-written text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-21T06:38:37Z) - Transformative Effects of ChatGPT on Modern Education: Emerging Era of
AI Chatbots [36.760677949631514]
ChatGPT was released to provide coherent and useful replies based on analysis of large volumes of data.
Our preliminary evaluation concludes that ChatGPT performed differently in each subject area including finance, coding and maths.
There are clear drawbacks in its use, such as the possibility of producing inaccurate or false data.
Academic regulations and evaluation practices need to be updated, should ChatGPT be used as a tool in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T17:35:57Z) - Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial
intelligence across 32 university courses [15.642614735026106]
We compare the performance of ChatGPT against students on 32 university-level courses.
We find that ChatGPT's performance is comparable, if not superior, to that of students in many courses.
We find an emerging consensus among students to use the tool, and among educators to treat this as plagiarism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-07T10:37:51Z) - ChatGPT in the Classroom: An Analysis of Its Strengths and Weaknesses
for Solving Undergraduate Computer Science Questions [5.962828109329824]
ChatGPT is an AI language model developed by OpenAI that can understand and generate human-like text.
There is concern that students may leverage ChatGPT to complete take-home assignments and exams and obtain favorable grades without genuinely acquiring knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-28T17:26:32Z) - To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection.
We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains.
Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z) - On the Educational Impact of ChatGPT: Is Artificial Intelligence Ready
to Obtain a University Degree? [0.0]
We evaluate the influence of ChatGPT on university education.
We discuss how computer science higher education should adapt to tools like ChatGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T14:27:37Z) - A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation.
It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries.
However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.