Exceeding Computational Complexity Trial-and-Error Dynamic Action and
Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03384v1
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:23:27 GMT
- Title: Exceeding Computational Complexity Trial-and-Error Dynamic Action and
Intelligence
- Authors: Chuyu Xiong
- Abstract summary: Computational complexity is a core theory of computer science, which dictates the degree of difficulty of computation.
In this paper, we try to clarify concepts, and we propose definitions such as unparticularized computing, particularized computing, computing agents, and dynamic search.
We also propose and discuss a framework, i.e., trial-and-error + dynamic search.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Computational complexity is a core theory of computer science, which dictates
the degree of difficulty of computation. There are many problems with high
complexity that we have to deal, which is especially true for AI. This raises a
big question: Is there a better way to deal with these highly complex problems
other than bounded by computational complexity? We believe that ideas and
methods from intelligence science can be applied to these problems and help us
to exceed computational complexity. In this paper, we try to clarify concepts,
and we propose definitions such as unparticularized computing, particularized
computing, computing agents, and dynamic search. We also propose and discuss a
framework, i.e., trial-and-error + dynamic search. Number Partition Problem is
a well-known NP-complete problem, and we use this problem as an example to
illustrate the ideas discussed.
Related papers
- Sum-of-Squares inspired Quantum Metaheuristic for Polynomial Optimization with the Hadamard Test and Approximate Amplitude Constraints [76.53316706600717]
Recently proposed quantum algorithm arXiv:2206.14999 is based on semidefinite programming (SDP)
We generalize the SDP-inspired quantum algorithm to sum-of-squares.
Our results show that our algorithm is suitable for large problems and approximate the best known classicals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T19:04:13Z) - Artifical intelligence and inherent mathematical difficulty [0.0]
We first present an updated version of a traditional argument that limitative results from computability and complexity theory show that proof discovery is an inherently difficult problem.
We then illustrate how several recent applications of artificial intelligence-inspired methods do indeed raise novel questions about the nature of mathematical proof.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T20:08:31Z) - Advancing Algorithmic Approaches to Probabilistic Argumentation under the Constellation Approach [0.0]
We develop an algorithm for the complex task of computing the probability of a set of arguments being a complete extension.
An experimental evaluation shows promise of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-06T12:08:38Z) - When Input Integers are Given in the Unary Numeral Representation [0.0]
Many NP-complete problems take integers as part of their input instances.
The "unarization" of numbers has been known to bring a remarkably different effect onto the computational complexity of the problems.
We present numerous NP-complete (or even NP-hard) problems, which turn out to be easily solvable when input integers are represented in unary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T15:09:24Z) - When Do Program-of-Thoughts Work for Reasoning? [51.2699797837818]
We propose complexity-impacted reasoning score (CIRS) to measure correlation between code and reasoning abilities.
Specifically, we use the abstract syntax tree to encode the structural information and calculate logical complexity.
Code will be integrated into the EasyInstruct framework at https://github.com/zjunlp/EasyInstruct.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T17:22:39Z) - Towards a Holistic Understanding of Mathematical Questions with
Contrastive Pre-training [65.10741459705739]
We propose a novel contrastive pre-training approach for mathematical question representations, namely QuesCo.
We first design two-level question augmentations, including content-level and structure-level, which generate literally diverse question pairs with similar purposes.
Then, to fully exploit hierarchical information of knowledge concepts, we propose a knowledge hierarchy-aware rank strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T14:23:29Z) - Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Minimization [77.33859525900334]
We present a new framework for iterative reasoning with neural networks.
We train a neural network to parameterize an energy landscape over all outputs.
We implement each step of the iterative reasoning as an energy minimization step to find a minimal energy solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T17:44:20Z) - End-to-end Algorithm Synthesis with Recurrent Networks: Logical
Extrapolation Without Overthinking [52.05847268235338]
We show how machine learning systems can perform logical extrapolation without overthinking problems.
We propose a recall architecture that keeps an explicit copy of the problem instance in memory so that it cannot be forgotten.
We also employ a progressive training routine that prevents the model from learning behaviors that are specific to number and instead pushes it to learn behaviors that can be repeated indefinitely.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-11T18:43:28Z) - On Theoretical Complexity and Boolean Satisfiability [0.0]
This thesis introduces some of the most central concepts in the Theory of Computing.
We then explore some of its tractable as well as intractable variants such as Horn-SAT and 3-SAT.
Finally, we establish reductions from 3-SAT to some of the famous NP-complete graph problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-22T10:13:34Z) - The Complexity of Adversarially Robust Proper Learning of Halfspaces
with Agnostic Noise [67.27523616312428]
We study the computational complexity of adversarially robust proper learning of halfspaces in the distribution-independent PAC model.
We give a computationally efficient learning algorithm and a nearly matching computational hardness result for this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-30T04:18:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.