A systematic literature review of capstone courses in software engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03554v1
• Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 18:04:35 GMT
• Title: A systematic literature review of capstone courses in software engineering
• Authors: Saara Tenhunen, Tomi M\"annist\"o, Matti Luukkainen, Petri Ihantola
• Abstract summary: capstone projects are a common way to provide students with hands-on experience and teach soft skills. This paper explores the characteristics of software engineering capstone courses presented in the literature.
• Score: 0.3536605202672354
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Tertiary education institutions aim to prepare their computer science and software engineering students for working life. While much of the technical principles are covered in lower-level courses, team-based capstone projects are a common way to provide students with hands-on experience and teach soft skills. This paper explores the characteristics of software engineering capstone courses presented in the literature. The goal of this work is to understand the pros and cons of different approaches by synthesising the various aspects of software engineering capstone courses and related experiences. In a systematic literature review for 2007-2022, we identified 127 primary studies. These studies were analysed based on their presented course characteristics and the reported course outcomes. The characteristics were synthesised into a taxonomy consisting of duration, team sizes, client and project sources, project implementation, and student assessment. We found out that capstone courses generally last one semester and divide students into groups of 4-5 where they work on a project for a client. For a slight majority of courses, the clients are external to the course staff and students are often expected to produce a proof-of-concept level software product as the main end deliverable. The courses also offer versatile assessments for students throughout the project. This paper provides researchers and educators with a classification of characteristics of software engineering capstone courses based on previous research. We further synthesise insights on the reported outcomes of capstone courses. Our review study aims to help educators to identify various ways of organising capstones and effectively plan and deliver their own capstone courses. The characterisation also helps researchers to conduct further studies on software engineering capstones.

Related papers

• Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [175.9723801486487]
  We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions. GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions. Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z)
• Ten Years of Teaching Empirical Software Engineering in the context of Energy-efficient Software [12.26887943861433]
  We share our experience in running ten editions of the Green Lab course at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The course is given in the Software Engineering and Green IT track of the Computer Science Master program of the VU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T07:44:49Z)
• Teaching and Learning Ethnography for Software Engineering Contexts [1.0992151305603264]
  This chapter provides an introduction to teaching and learning ethnography for faculty teaching ethnography to software engineering graduate students. The contents of the chapter focus on what we think is the core basic knowledge for newbies to ethnography as a research method. The chapter is designed to support part of a course on empirical software engineering and provides pointers and literature for further reading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T15:43:02Z)
• Enhancing Student Engagement in Large-Scale Capstone Courses: An Experience Report [2.7629502923028944]
  capstone courses offer students a valuable opportunity to gain hands-on experience in software development. coordinating a capstone course, especially for a large student cohort, can be a daunting task for academic staff. We outline the iterative development and refinement of our capstone course as it grew substantially in size over a span of six consecutive sessions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T23:59:35Z)
• Charting a Path to Efficient Onboarding: The Role of Software Visualization [49.1574468325115]
  The present study aims to explore the familiarity of managers, leaders, and developers with software visualization tools. This approach incorporated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected from practitioners using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T21:30:45Z)
• Personalization, Cognition, and Gamification-based Programming Language Learning: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Literature Review [0.13053649021965597]
  Programming courses in computing science are important because they are often the first introduction to computer programming for many students. The current teacher-lecturer model of learning commonly employed in university lecture halls often results in a lack of motivation and participation in learning. This paper provides insights into designing and implementing effective personalized gamification interventions in programming courses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T05:14:23Z)
• Team Composition in Software Engineering Education [0.5439020425819]
  The study presented in this paper aims to better understand the student team composition in software engineering education. The initial findings of the ongoing Action research study are presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T11:00:05Z)
• Teaching Fairness, Accountability, Confidentiality, and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence through the Lens of Reproducibility [38.87910190291545]
  We explain the setup for a technical, graduate-level course on Fairness, Accountability, Confidentiality and Transparency in Artificial Intelligence (FACT-AI) at the University of Amsterdam. The focal point of the course is a group project based on existing FACT-AI algorithms from top AI conferences, and writing a report about their experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T10:58:35Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
• Are Top School Students More Critical of Their Professors? Mining Comments on RateMyProfessor.com [83.2634062100579]
  Student reviews and comments on RateMyProfessor.com reflect realistic learning experiences of students. Our study proves that student reviews and comments contain crucial information and can serve as essential references for enrollment in courses and universities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-23T20:01:36Z)
• Machine Learning for Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping [73.30245214374027]
  The software development industry is rapidly adopting machine learning for transitioning modern day software systems towards highly intelligent and self-learning systems. No comprehensive study exists that explores the current state-of-the-art on the adoption of machine learning across software engineering life cycle stages. This study introduces a machine learning for software engineering (MLSE) taxonomy classifying the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques according to their applicability to various software engineering life cycle stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T11:56:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.