Analyzing User Engagement with TikTok's Short Format Video Recommendations using Data Donations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04945v2
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:22:44 GMT
- Title: Analyzing User Engagement with TikTok's Short Format Video Recommendations using Data Donations
- Authors: Savvas Zannettou, Olivia-Nemes Nemeth, Oshrat Ayalon, Angelica Goetzen, Krishna P. Gummadi, Elissa M. Redmiles, Franziska Roesner,
- Abstract summary: We analyze user engagement on TikTok using data we collect via a data donation system.
We find that the average daily usage time increases over the users' lifetime while the user attention remains stable at around 45%.
We also find that users like more videos uploaded by people they follow than those recommended by people they do not follow.
- Score: 31.764672446151412
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Short-format videos have exploded on platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. Despite this, the research community lacks large-scale empirical studies into how people engage with short-format videos and the role of recommendation systems that offer endless streams of such content. In this work, we analyze user engagement on TikTok using data we collect via a data donation system that allows TikTok users to donate their data. We recruited 347 TikTok users and collected 9.2M TikTok video recommendations they received. By analyzing user engagement, we find that the average daily usage time increases over the users' lifetime while the user attention remains stable at around 45%. We also find that users like more videos uploaded by people they follow than those recommended by people they do not follow. Our study offers valuable insights into how users engage with short-format videos on TikTok and lessons learned from designing a data donation system.
Related papers
- Studying Behavioral Addiction by Combining Surveys and Digital Traces: A Case Study of TikTok [8.709322238283734]
We study if one can effectively diagnose behavioral addiction using digital data traces from social media platforms.
We survey 1590 TikTok users and stratify them into three addiction groups.
By analyzing users' data, we find that highly likely addicted users spend more time watching TikTok videos and keep coming back to TikTok throughout the day.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-26T14:24:07Z) - A Hybrid Filtering for Micro-video Hashtag Recommendation using Graph-based Deep Neural Network [0.3573481101204926]
We propose a hybrid filtering based MIcro-video haSHtag recommendatiON MISHON technique to recommend hashtags for microvideos.
Since hashtags reflect users topical interests, we find similar users based on historical tagging behavior to model user relatedness.
We also propose a content and social influence based technique to model the relatedness of cold start users with influential users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T10:46:32Z) - Beyond Relevance: Improving User Engagement by Personalization for Short-Video Search [16.491313774639007]
We introduce $textPR2$, a novel and comprehensive solution for personalizing short-video search.
Specifically, $textPR2$ leverages query-relevant collaborative filtering and personalized dense retrieval.
We have achieved the most remarkable user engagement improvements in recent years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T15:37:51Z) - Counteracting Duration Bias in Video Recommendation via Counterfactual Watch Time [63.844468159126826]
Watch time prediction suffers from duration bias, hindering its ability to reflect users' interests accurately.
Counterfactual Watch Model (CWM) is proposed, revealing that CWT equals the time users get the maximum benefit from video recommender systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T06:55:35Z) - Viblio: Introducing Credibility Signals and Citations to Video-Sharing
Platforms [8.832571289776256]
Viblio is a prototype system that enables YouTube users to view and add citations while watching a video based on participants' needs.
From an evaluation with 12 people, all participants found Viblio to be intuitive and useful in the process of evaluating a video's credibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T05:21:39Z) - User Strategization and Trustworthy Algorithms [81.82279667028423]
We show that user strategization can actually help platforms in the short term.
We then show that it corrupts platforms' data and ultimately hurts their ability to make counterfactual decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-29T16:09:42Z) - Personalizing Intervened Network for Long-tailed Sequential User
Behavior Modeling [66.02953670238647]
Tail users suffer from significantly lower-quality recommendation than the head users after joint training.
A model trained on tail users separately still achieve inferior results due to limited data.
We propose a novel approach that significantly improves the recommendation performance of the tail users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T02:50:19Z) - An Empirical Investigation of Personalization Factors on TikTok [77.34726150561087]
Despite the importance of TikTok's algorithm to the platform's success and content distribution, little work has been done on the empirical analysis of the algorithm.
Using a sock-puppet audit methodology with a custom algorithm developed by us, we tested and analysed the effect of the language and location used to access TikTok.
We identify that the follow-feature has the strongest influence, followed by the like-feature and video view rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-28T17:40:00Z) - QVHighlights: Detecting Moments and Highlights in Videos via Natural
Language Queries [89.24431389933703]
We present the Query-based Video Highlights (QVHighlights) dataset.
It consists of over 10,000 YouTube videos, covering a wide range of topics.
Each video in the dataset is annotated with: (1) a human-written free-form NL query, (2) relevant moments in the video w.r.t. the query, and (3) five-point scale saliency scores for all query-relevant clips.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-20T16:42:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.