A Stability Analysis of Fine-Tuning a Pre-Trained Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09820v2
• Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:08:34 GMT
• Title: A Stability Analysis of Fine-Tuning a Pre-Trained Model
• Authors: Zihao Fu, Anthony Man-Cho So, Nigel Collier
• Abstract summary: Fine-tuning a pre-trained model is one of the most promising paradigms in recent NLP research. Fine-tuning suffers from the instability problem, i.e., tuning the same model under the same setting results in significantly different performance. We propose a novel theoretical stability analysis of fine-tuning that focuses on two commonly used settings.
• Score: 46.6761331971071
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Fine-tuning a pre-trained model (such as BERT, ALBERT, RoBERTa, T5, GPT, etc.) has proven to be one of the most promising paradigms in recent NLP research. However, numerous recent works indicate that fine-tuning suffers from the instability problem, i.e., tuning the same model under the same setting results in significantly different performance. Many recent works have proposed different methods to solve this problem, but there is no theoretical understanding of why and how these methods work. In this paper, we propose a novel theoretical stability analysis of fine-tuning that focuses on two commonly used settings, namely, full fine-tuning and head tuning. We define the stability under each setting and prove the corresponding stability bounds. The theoretical bounds explain why and how several existing methods can stabilize the fine-tuning procedure. In addition to being able to explain most of the observed empirical discoveries, our proposed theoretical analysis framework can also help in the design of effective and provable methods. Based on our theory, we propose three novel strategies to stabilize the fine-tuning procedure, namely, Maximal Margin Regularizer (MMR), Multi-Head Loss (MHLoss), and Self Unsupervised Re-Training (SURT). We extensively evaluate our proposed approaches on 11 widely used real-world benchmark datasets, as well as hundreds of synthetic classification datasets. The experiment results show that our proposed methods significantly stabilize the fine-tuning procedure and also corroborate our theoretical analysis.

Related papers

• See Further for Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning by Standing on the Shoulders of Decomposition [56.87609859444084]
  parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) focuses on optimizing a select subset of parameters while keeping the rest fixed, significantly lowering computational and storage overheads. We take the first step to unify all approaches by dissecting them from a decomposition perspective. We introduce two novel PEFT methods alongside a simple yet effective framework designed to enhance the performance of PEFT techniques across various applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T15:44:42Z)
• A Unified Theory of Stochastic Proximal Point Methods without Smoothness [52.30944052987393]
  Proximal point methods have attracted considerable interest owing to their numerical stability and robustness against imperfect tuning. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of a broad range of variations of the proximal point method (SPPM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T21:09:19Z)
• Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization [29.24821214671497]
  Training machine learning and statistical models often involve optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. We propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T21:19:15Z)
• Provable Guarantees for Generative Behavior Cloning: Bridging Low-Level Stability and High-Level Behavior [51.60683890503293]
  We propose a theoretical framework for studying behavior cloning of complex expert demonstrations using generative modeling. We show that pure supervised cloning can generate trajectories matching the per-time step distribution of arbitrary expert trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T04:27:26Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning [79.6302606855302]
  Currently, many research works propose to only fine-tune a small portion of the parameters while keeping most of the parameters shared across different tasks. We show that all of the methods are actually sparse fine-tuned models and conduct a novel theoretical analysis of them. Despite the effectiveness of sparsity grounded by our theory, it still remains an open problem of how to choose the tunable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T17:41:48Z)
• Delta Tuning: A Comprehensive Study of Parameter Efficient Methods for Pre-trained Language Models [90.24999406296867]
  In contrast with the standard fine-tuning, delta tuning only fine-tunes a small portion of the model parameters while keeping the rest untouched. Recent studies have demonstrated that a series of delta tuning methods with distinct tuned parameter selection could achieve performance on a par with full- parameter fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T07:56:32Z)
• On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselines [31.807628937487927]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models such as BERT has become a common practice dominating leaderboards across various NLP benchmarks. Previous literature identified two potential reasons for the observed instability: catastrophic forgetting and small size of the fine-tuning datasets. We show that both hypotheses fail to explain the fine-tuning instability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T19:06:24Z)
• Real-Time Model Calibration with Deep Reinforcement Learning [4.707841918805165]
  We propose a novel framework for inference of model parameters based on reinforcement learning. The proposed methodology is demonstrated and evaluated on two model-based diagnostics test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T00:11:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.