Smart tutor to provide feedback in programming courses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09918v2
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 18:46:06 GMT
• Title: Smart tutor to provide feedback in programming courses
• Authors: David Rold\'an-\'Alvarez
• Abstract summary: We present an AI based intelligent tutor that answers students programming questions. The tool has been tested by university students at the URJC along a whole course.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming more and more popular as time passes, allowing to perform tasks that were difficult to do in the past. From predictions to customization, AI is being used in many areas, not being educational environments outside this situation. AI is being used in educational settings to customize contents or to provide personalized feedback to the students, among others. In this scenario, AI in programming teaching is something that still has to be explored, since in this area we usually find assessment tools that allow grading the students work, but we can not find many tools aimed towards providing feedback to the students in the process of creating their program. In this work we present an AI based intelligent tutor that answers students programming questions. The tool has been tested by university students at the URJC along a whole course. Even if the tool is still in its preliminary phase, it helped the students with their questions, providing accurate answers and examples. The students were able to use the intelligent tutor easily and they thought that it could be a useful tool to use in other courses.

Related papers

• A Multi-Year Grey Literature Review on AI-assisted Test Automation [46.97326049485643]
  Test Automation (TA) techniques are crucial for quality assurance in software engineering. TA techniques face limitations such as high test suite maintenance costs and the need for extensive programming skills. Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to address these issues through automation and improved practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T15:26:36Z)
• Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [175.9723801486487]
  We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions. GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions. Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z)
• How Novice Programmers Use and Experience ChatGPT when Solving Programming Exercises in an Introductory Course [0.0]
  This research paper contributes to the computing education research community's understanding of Generative AI (GenAI) in the context of introductory programming. This study is guided by the following research questions:. What do students report on their use pattern of ChatGPT in the context of introductory programming exercises? How do students perceive ChatGPT in the context of introductory programming exercises?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T12:55:42Z)
• Integrating AI Tutors in a Programming Course [0.0]
  RAGMan is an LLM-powered tutoring system that can support a variety of course-specific and homework-specific AI tutors. This paper describes the interactions the students had with the AI tutors, the students' feedback, and a comparative grade analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T00:42:39Z)
• I would love this to be like an assistant, not the teacher: a voice of the customer perspective of what distance learning students want from an Artificial Intelligence Digital Assistant [0.0]
  This study examined the perceptions of ten online and distance learning students regarding the design of a hypothetical AI Digital Assistant (AIDA) All participants agreed on the usefulness of such an AI tool while studying and reported benefits from using it for real-time assistance and query resolution, support for academic tasks, personalisation and accessibility, together with emotional and social support. Students' concerns related to the ethical and social implications of implementing AIDA, data privacy and data use, operational challenges, academic integrity and misuse, and the future of education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T08:10:41Z)
• AI for non-programmers: Applied AI in the lectures for students without programming skills [0.0]
  This work presents a didactic planning script for applied AI. The didactic planning script is based on the AI application pipeline and links AI concepts with study-relevant topics. An example lecture series for master students in energy management shows how AI can be seamlessly integrated into discipline-specific lectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T17:26:24Z)
• Giving Feedback on Interactive Student Programs with Meta-Exploration [74.5597783609281]
  Developing interactive software, such as websites or games, is a particularly engaging way to learn computer science. Standard approaches require instructors to manually grade student-implemented interactive programs. Online platforms that serve millions, like Code.org, are unable to provide any feedback on assignments for implementing interactive programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T10:00:23Z)
• An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
  We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z)
• The MineRL BASALT Competition on Learning from Human Feedback [58.17897225617566]
  The MineRL BASALT competition aims to spur forward research on this important class of techniques. We design a suite of four tasks in Minecraft for which we expect it will be hard to write down hardcoded reward functions. We provide a dataset of human demonstrations on each of the four tasks, as well as an imitation learning baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:18:17Z)
• Actionable Models: Unsupervised Offline Reinforcement Learning of Robotic Skills [93.12417203541948]
  We propose the objective of learning a functional understanding of the environment by learning to reach any goal state in a given dataset. We find that our method can operate on high-dimensional camera images and learn a variety of skills on real robots that generalize to previously unseen scenes and objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T20:10:11Z)
• Teaching Tech to Talk: K-12 Conversational Artificial Intelligence Literacy Curriculum and Development Tools [9.797319790710711]
  We evaluate our Conversational Agent Interface for MIT App Inventor and workshop curriculum with respect to AI competencies. We found students struggled most with the concepts of AI ethics and learning, and recommend emphasizing these topics when teaching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T20:52:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.