Dual Box Embeddings for the Description Logic EL++
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11118v5
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:10:57 GMT
- Title: Dual Box Embeddings for the Description Logic EL++
- Authors: Mathias Jackermeier, Jiaoyan Chen, Ian Horrocks,
- Abstract summary: Similar to Knowledge Graphs (KGs), Knowledge Graphs are often incomplete, and maintaining and constructing them has proved challenging.
Similar to KGs, a promising approach is to learn embeddings in a latent vector space, while additionally ensuring they adhere to the semantics of the underlying DL.
We propose a novel ontology embedding method named Box$2$EL for the DL EL++, which represents both concepts and roles as boxes.
- Score: 16.70961576041243
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: OWL ontologies, whose formal semantics are rooted in Description Logic (DL), have been widely used for knowledge representation. Similar to Knowledge Graphs (KGs), ontologies are often incomplete, and maintaining and constructing them has proved challenging. While classical deductive reasoning algorithms use the precise formal semantics of an ontology to predict missing facts, recent years have witnessed growing interest in inductive reasoning techniques that can derive probable facts from an ontology. Similar to KGs, a promising approach is to learn ontology embeddings in a latent vector space, while additionally ensuring they adhere to the semantics of the underlying DL. While a variety of approaches have been proposed, current ontology embedding methods suffer from several shortcomings, especially that they all fail to faithfully model one-to-many, many-to-one, and many-to-many relations and role inclusion axioms. To address this problem and improve ontology completion performance, we propose a novel ontology embedding method named Box$^2$EL for the DL EL++, which represents both concepts and roles as boxes (i.e., axis-aligned hyperrectangles), and models inter-concept relationships using a bumping mechanism. We theoretically prove the soundness of Box$^2$EL and conduct an extensive experimental evaluation, achieving state-of-the-art results across a variety of datasets on the tasks of subsumption prediction, role assertion prediction, and approximating deductive reasoning.
Related papers
- TransBox: EL++-closed Ontology Embedding [14.850996103983187]
We develop an effective EL++-closed embedding method that can handle many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations.
Our experiments demonstrate that TransBox achieves state-of-the-art performance across various real-world datasets for predicting complex axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T16:17:10Z) - Towards LogiGLUE: A Brief Survey and A Benchmark for Analyzing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models [56.34029644009297]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to overcome various limitations of formal Knowledge Representation (KR) systems.
LLMs excel most in abductive reasoning, followed by deductive reasoning, while they are least effective at inductive reasoning.
We study single-task training, multi-task training, and "chain-of-thought" knowledge distillation fine-tuning technique to assess the performance of model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T01:00:50Z) - LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and
Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge.
During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training.
These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z) - Logic-induced Diagnostic Reasoning for Semi-supervised Semantic
Segmentation [85.12429517510311]
LogicDiag is a neural-logic semi-supervised learning framework for semantic segmentation.
Our key insight is that conflicts within pseudo labels, identified through symbolic knowledge, can serve as strong yet commonly ignored learning signals.
We showcase the practical application of LogicDiag in the data-hungry segmentation scenario, where we formalize the structured abstraction of semantic concepts as a set of logic rules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T06:50:07Z) - Lattice-preserving $\mathcal{ALC}$ ontology embeddings with saturation [50.05281461410368]
An order-preserving embedding method is proposed to generate embeddings of OWL representations.
We show that our method outperforms state-the-art theory-of-the-art embedding methods in several knowledge base completion tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T22:27:51Z) - From axioms over graphs to vectors, and back again: evaluating the
properties of graph-based ontology embeddings [78.217418197549]
One approach to generating embeddings is by introducing a set of nodes and edges for named entities and logical axioms structure.
Methods that embed in graphs (graph projections) have different properties related to the type of axioms they utilize.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-29T08:21:49Z) - Why Settle for Just One? Extending EL++ Ontology Embeddings with
Many-to-Many Relationships [2.599882743586164]
Knowledge Graph embeddings provide a low-dimensional representation of entities and relations of a Knowledge Graph.
Recent efforts in this direction involve learning embeddings for a Description (logical Logic for a description) named EL++.
We provide a simple and effective solution that allows such methods to consider many-to-many relationships while learning embedding representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-20T13:23:18Z) - DISSECT: Disentangled Simultaneous Explanations via Concept Traversals [33.65478845353047]
DISSECT is a novel approach to explaining deep learning model inferences.
By training a generative model from a classifier's signal, DISSECT offers a way to discover a classifier's inherent "notion" of distinct concepts.
We show that DISSECT produces CTs that disentangle several concepts and are coupled to its reasoning due to joint training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-31T17:11:56Z) - Learning Description Logic Ontologies. Five Approaches. Where Do They
Stand? [14.650545418986058]
We highlight machine learning and data mining approaches that have been proposed for the creation of description logic (DL)
These are based on association rule mining, formal concept analysis, inductive logic programming, computational learning theory, and neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-02T18:36:45Z) - A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification [52.879658637466605]
We develop a list of diagnostic properties for evaluating existing explainability techniques.
We compare the saliency scores assigned by the explainability techniques with human annotations of salient input regions to find relations between a model's performance and the agreement of its rationales with human ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-25T12:01:53Z) - Plausible Reasoning about EL-Ontologies using Concept Interpolation [27.314325986689752]
We propose an inductive mechanism which is based on a clear model-theoretic semantics, and can thus be tightly integrated with standard deductive reasoning.
We focus on inference, a powerful commonsense reasoning mechanism which is closely related to cognitive models of category-based induction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-25T14:19:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.