Do Multi-Document Summarization Models Synthesize?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13844v2
• Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:24:46 GMT
• Title: Do Multi-Document Summarization Models Synthesize?
• Authors: Jay DeYoung, Stephanie C. Martinez, Iain J. Marshall, Byron C. Wallace,
• Abstract summary: We run experiments over opinion and evidence synthesis datasets using a suite of summarization models. We find that existing models partially perform synthesis, but imperfectly. We propose a simple, general, effective method for improving model synthesis capabilities.
• Score: 24.170828395176727
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-document summarization entails producing concise synopses of collections of inputs. For some applications, the synopsis should accurately synthesize inputs with respect to a key aspect, e.g., a synopsis of film reviews written about a particular movie should reflect the average critic consensus. As a more consequential example, narrative summaries that accompany biomedical systematic reviews of clinical trial results should accurately summarize the potentially conflicting results from individual trials. In this paper we ask: To what extent do modern multi-document summarization models implicitly perform this sort of synthesis? We run experiments over opinion and evidence synthesis datasets using a suite of summarization models, from fine-tuned transformers to GPT-4. We find that existing models partially perform synthesis, but imperfectly: even the best performing models are over-sensitive to changes in input ordering and under-sensitive to changes in input compositions (e.g., ratio of positive to negative reviews). We propose a simple, general, effective method for improving model synthesis capabilities by generating an explicitly diverse set of candidate outputs, and then selecting from these the string best aligned with the expected aggregate measure for the inputs, or abstaining when the model produces no good candidate.

Related papers

• Assessment of Transformer-Based Encoder-Decoder Model for Human-Like Summarization [0.05852077003870416]
  This work leverages transformer-based BART model for human-like summarization. On training and fine-tuning the encoder-decoder model, it is tested with diverse sample articles. The finetuned model performance is compared with the baseline pretrained model. Empirical results on BBC News articles highlight that the gold standard summaries written by humans are more factually consistent by 17%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T09:25:04Z)
• SynthesizRR: Generating Diverse Datasets with Retrieval Augmentation [55.2480439325792]
  We study the synthesis of six datasets, covering topic classification, sentiment analysis, tone detection, and humor. We find that SynthesizRR greatly improves lexical and semantic diversity, similarity to human-written text, and distillation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T12:22:41Z)
• Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infilling [56.70682379371534]
  We show that our approach vastly outperforms prior methods in correcting erroneous summaries. Our model -- FactEdit -- improves factuality scores by over 11 points on CNN/DM and over 31 points on XSum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T07:16:19Z)
• Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection [54.38512834521367]
  We study contrast candidate generation and selection as a model-agnostic post-processing technique. We learn a discriminative correction model by generating alternative candidate summaries. This model is then used to select the best candidate as the final output summary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T05:39:24Z)
• SummScreen: A Dataset for Abstractive Screenplay Summarization [52.56760815805357]
  SummScreen is a dataset comprised of pairs of TV series transcripts and human written recaps. Plot details are often expressed indirectly in character dialogues and may be scattered across the entirety of the transcript. Since characters are fundamental to TV series, we also propose two entity-centric evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T19:37:40Z)
• Generating (Factual?) Narrative Summaries of RCTs: Experiments with Neural Multi-Document Summarization [22.611879349101596]
  We evaluate modern neural models for abstractive summarization of relevant article abstracts from systematic reviews. We find that modern summarization systems yield consistently fluent and relevant synopses, but that they are not always factual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-25T22:22:50Z)
• Knowledge Graph-Augmented Abstractive Summarization with Semantic-Driven Cloze Reward [42.925345819778656]
  We present ASGARD, a novel framework for Abstractive Summarization with Graph-Augmentation and semantic-driven RewarD. We propose the use of dual encoders---a sequential document encoder and a graph-structured encoder---to maintain the global context and local characteristics of entities. Results show that our models produce significantly higher ROUGE scores than a variant without knowledge graph as input on both New York Times and CNN/Daily Mail datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T18:23:06Z)
• Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization [117.70510762845338]
  Opinion summarization is the automatic creation of text reflecting subjective information expressed in multiple documents. In this work, we show that even a handful of summaries is sufficient to bootstrap generation of the summary text. Our approach substantially outperforms previous extractive and abstractive methods in automatic and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T15:37:38Z)
• Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and Denoising [85.49169453434554]
  We create a synthetic dataset from a corpus of user reviews by sampling a review, pretending it is a summary, and generating noisy versions thereof. At test time, the model accepts genuine reviews and generates a summary containing salient opinions, treating those that do not reach consensus as noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T16:54:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.