Causal Estimation of Exposure Shifts with Neural Networks: Evaluating the Health Benefits of Stricter Air Quality Standards in the US

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02560v3
• Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 18:55:43 GMT
• Title: Causal Estimation of Exposure Shifts with Neural Networks: Evaluating the Health Benefits of Stricter Air Quality Standards in the US
• Authors: Mauricio Tec, Oladimeji Mudele, Kevin Josey, Francesca Dominici
• Abstract summary: We develop a neural network method and its theoretical underpinnings to estimate shift-response functions. We apply our method to data consisting of 68 million individuals and 27 million deaths across the U.S. Our goal is to estimate, for the first time, the reduction in deaths that would result from this anticipated revision using causal methods.
• Score: 3.1952340441132474
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In policy research, one of the most critical analytic tasks is to estimate the causal effect of a policy-relevant shift to the distribution of a continuous exposure/treatment on an outcome of interest. We call this problem shift-response function (SRF) estimation. Existing neural network methods involving robust causal-effect estimators lack theoretical guarantees and practical implementations for SRF estimation. Motivated by a key policy-relevant question in public health, we develop a neural network method and its theoretical underpinnings to estimate SRFs with robustness and efficiency guarantees. We then apply our method to data consisting of 68 million individuals and 27 million deaths across the U.S. to estimate the causal effect from revising the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM 2.5 from 12 $\mu g/m^3$ to 9 $\mu g/m^3$. This change has been recently proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Our goal is to estimate, for the first time, the reduction in deaths that would result from this anticipated revision using causal methods for SRFs. Our proposed method, called {T}argeted {R}egularization for {E}xposure {S}hifts with Neural {Net}works (TRESNET), contributes to the neural network literature for causal inference in two ways: first, it proposes a targeted regularization loss with theoretical properties that ensure double robustness and achieves asymptotic efficiency specific for SRF estimation; second, it enables loss functions from the exponential family of distributions to accommodate non-continuous outcome distributions (such as hospitalization or mortality counts). We complement our application with benchmark experiments that demonstrate TRESNET's broad applicability and competitiveness.

Related papers

• Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning [24.63284452991301]
  We propose a doubly robust causal effect estimator under networked interference. Specifically, we generalize the targeted learning technique into the networked interference setting. We devise an end-to-end causal effect estimator by transforming the identified theoretical condition into a targeted loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T10:49:51Z)
• Targeted Machine Learning for Average Causal Effect Estimation Using the Front-Door Functional [3.0232957374216953]
  evaluating the average causal effect (ACE) of a treatment on an outcome often involves overcoming the challenges posed by confounding factors in observational studies. Here, we introduce novel estimation strategies for the front-door criterion based on the targeted minimum loss-based estimation theory. We demonstrate the applicability of these estimators to analyze the effect of early stage academic performance on future yearly income.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• TNDDR: Efficient and doubly robust estimation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness under the test-negative design [0.46426477564038643]
  The test-negative design (TND) is susceptible to selection bias due to outcome-dependent sampling. We propose a one-step doubly robust and locally efficient estimator called TNDDR (TND doubly robust) We apply it to estimate COVID-19 VE in an administrative dataset of community-dwelling older people (aged $geq 60$y) in the province of Qu'ebec, Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T20:40:59Z)
• Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in Offline-RL [86.0987896274354]
  We first identify a fundamental pattern, self-excitation, as the primary cause of Q-value estimation divergence in offline RL. We then propose a novel Self-Excite Eigenvalue Measure (SEEM) metric to measure the evolving property of Q-network at training. For the first time, our theory can reliably decide whether the training will diverge at an early stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T17:57:44Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• Neural Importance Sampling for Rapid and Reliable Gravitational-Wave Inference [59.040209568168436]
  We first generate a rapid proposal for the Bayesian posterior using neural networks, and then attach importance weights based on the underlying likelihood and prior. This provides (1) a corrected posterior free from network inaccuracies, (2) a performance diagnostic (the sample efficiency) for assessing the proposal and identifying failure cases, and (3) an unbiased estimate of the Bayesian evidence. We carry out a large study analyzing 42 binary black hole mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo with the SEOBNRv4PHM and IMRPhenomHMXP waveform models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T18:00:02Z)
• An Efficient Approach for Optimizing the Cost-effective Individualized Treatment Rule Using Conditional Random Forest [5.406112598028401]
  We use the concept of net-monetary-benefit (NMB) to assess the trade-off between health benefits and related costs. We identify the optimal CE-ITR using NMB-based classification algorithms. We apply our top-performing algorithm to the NIH-funded Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-23T01:36:24Z)
• Residual Error: a New Performance Measure for Adversarial Robustness [85.0371352689919]
  A major challenge that limits the wide-spread adoption of deep learning has been their fragility to adversarial attacks. This study presents the concept of residual error, a new performance measure for assessing the adversarial robustness of a deep neural network. Experimental results using the case of image classification demonstrate the effectiveness and efficacy of the proposed residual error metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T16:34:23Z)
• Estimating the Uncertainty of Neural Network Forecasts for Influenza Prevalence Using Web Search Activity [3.632189127068905]
  Influenza is an infectious disease with the potential to become a pandemic. Forecasting its prevalence is an important undertaking for planning an effective response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T09:45:23Z)
• Neural Networks and Value at Risk [59.85784504799224]
  We perform Monte-Carlo simulations of asset returns for Value at Risk threshold estimation. Using equity markets and long term bonds as test assets, we investigate neural networks. We find our networks when fed with substantially less data to perform significantly worse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T17:41:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.