Causal Estimation of Exposure Shifts with Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02560v4
• Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2024 02:46:35 GMT
• Title: Causal Estimation of Exposure Shifts with Neural Networks
• Authors: Mauricio Tec, Kevin Josey, Oladimeji Mudele, Francesca Dominici,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Targeted Regularization for Exposure Shifts with Neural Networks (TRESNET) to estimate shift-response function (SRF) estimation. We then apply our method to estimate the causal effect of revising the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM 2.5 from 12 $mug/m3$ to 9 $mug/m3$.
• Score: 2.9248916859490173
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A fundamental task in causal inference is estimating the effect of distribution shift in the treatment variable. We refer to this problem as shift-response function (SRF) estimation. Existing neural network methods for causal inference lack theoretical guarantees and practical implementations for SRF estimation. In this paper, we introduce Targeted Regularization for Exposure Shifts with Neural Networks (TRESNET), a method to estimate SRFs with robustness and efficiency guarantees. Our contributions are twofold. First, we propose a targeted regularization loss for neural networks with theoretical properties that ensure double robustness and asymptotic efficiency specific to SRF estimation. Second, we extend targeted regularization to support loss functions from the exponential family to accommodate non-continuous outcome distributions (e.g., discrete counts). We conduct benchmark experiments demonstrating TRESNET's broad applicability and competitiveness. We then apply our method to a key policy question in public health to estimate the causal effect of revising the US National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM 2.5 from 12 ${\mu}g/m^3$ to 9 ${\mu}g/m^3$. This change has been recently proposed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Our goal is to estimate the reduction in deaths that would result from this anticipated revision using data consisting of 68 million individuals across the U.S.

Related papers

• Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning [24.63284452991301]
  We propose a doubly robust causal effect estimator under networked interference. Specifically, we generalize the targeted learning technique into the networked interference setting. We devise an end-to-end causal effect estimator by transforming the identified theoretical condition into a targeted loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T10:49:51Z)
• TNDDR: Efficient and doubly robust estimation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness under the test-negative design [0.46426477564038643]
  The test-negative design (TND) is susceptible to selection bias due to outcome-dependent sampling. We propose a one-step doubly robust and locally efficient estimator called TNDDR (TND doubly robust) We apply it to estimate COVID-19 VE in an administrative dataset of community-dwelling older people (aged $geq 60$y) in the province of Qu'ebec, Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T20:40:59Z)
• Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in Offline-RL [86.0987896274354]
  We first identify a fundamental pattern, self-excitation, as the primary cause of Q-value estimation divergence in offline RL. We then propose a novel Self-Excite Eigenvalue Measure (SEEM) metric to measure the evolving property of Q-network at training. For the first time, our theory can reliably decide whether the training will diverge at an early stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T17:57:44Z)
• Neural Importance Sampling for Rapid and Reliable Gravitational-Wave Inference [59.040209568168436]
  We first generate a rapid proposal for the Bayesian posterior using neural networks, and then attach importance weights based on the underlying likelihood and prior. This provides (1) a corrected posterior free from network inaccuracies, (2) a performance diagnostic (the sample efficiency) for assessing the proposal and identifying failure cases, and (3) an unbiased estimate of the Bayesian evidence. We carry out a large study analyzing 42 binary black hole mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo with the SEOBNRv4PHM and IMRPhenomHMXP waveform models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T18:00:02Z)
• How Tempering Fixes Data Augmentation in Bayesian Neural Networks [22.188535244056016]
  We show that tempering implicitly reduces the misspecification arising from modeling augmentations as i.i.d. data. The temperature mimics the role of the effective sample size, reflecting the gain in information provided by the augmentations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T11:06:56Z)
• Estimating the Uncertainty of Neural Network Forecasts for Influenza Prevalence Using Web Search Activity [3.632189127068905]
  Influenza is an infectious disease with the potential to become a pandemic. Forecasting its prevalence is an important undertaking for planning an effective response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T09:45:23Z)
• Learning Calibrated Uncertainties for Domain Shift: A Distributionally Robust Learning Approach [150.8920602230832]
  We propose a framework for learning calibrated uncertainties under domain shifts. In particular, the density ratio estimation reflects the closeness of a target (test) sample to the source (training) distribution. We show that our proposed method generates calibrated uncertainties that benefit downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T02:10:54Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Scaling Equilibrium Propagation to Deep ConvNets by Drastically Reducing its Gradient Estimator Bias [65.13042449121411]
  In practice, training a network with the gradient estimates provided by EP does not scale to visual tasks harder than MNIST. We show that a bias in the gradient estimate of EP, inherent in the use of finite nudging, is responsible for this phenomenon. We apply these techniques to train an architecture with asymmetric forward and backward connections, yielding a 13.2% test error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-06T09:36:07Z)
• Neural Networks and Value at Risk [59.85784504799224]
  We perform Monte-Carlo simulations of asset returns for Value at Risk threshold estimation. Using equity markets and long term bonds as test assets, we investigate neural networks. We find our networks when fed with substantially less data to perform significantly worse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T17:41:59Z)
• The Counterfactual $\chi$-GAN [20.42556178617068]
  Causal inference often relies on the counterfactual framework, which requires that treatment assignment is independent of the outcome. This work proposes a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based model called the Counterfactual $chi$-GAN (cGAN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-09T17:23:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.