Introduction To Gaussian Process Regression In Bayesian Inverse Problems, With New ResultsOn Experimental Design For Weighted Error Measures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04518v1
• Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 09:25:39 GMT
• Title: Introduction To Gaussian Process Regression In Bayesian Inverse Problems, With New ResultsOn Experimental Design For Weighted Error Measures
• Authors: Tapio Helin, Andrew Stuart, Aretha Teckentrup, Konstantinos Zygalakis
• Abstract summary: This work serves as an introduction to Gaussian process regression, in particular in the context of building surrogate models for inverse problems. We show that the error between the true and approximate posterior distribution can be bounded by the error between the true and approximate likelihood, measured in the $L2$-norm weighted by the true posterior.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian posterior distributions arising in modern applications, including inverse problems in partial differential equation models in tomography and subsurface flow, are often computationally intractable due to the large computational cost of evaluating the data likelihood. To alleviate this problem, we consider using Gaussian process regression to build a surrogate model for the likelihood, resulting in an approximate posterior distribution that is amenable to computations in practice. This work serves as an introduction to Gaussian process regression, in particular in the context of building surrogate models for inverse problems, and presents new insights into a suitable choice of training points. We show that the error between the true and approximate posterior distribution can be bounded by the error between the true and approximate likelihood, measured in the $L^2$-norm weighted by the true posterior, and that efficiently bounding the error between the true and approximate likelihood in this norm suggests choosing the training points in the Gaussian process surrogate model based on the true posterior.

Related papers

• Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems Using Optimal Posterior Covariance [52.093434664236014]
  Recent diffusion models provide a promising zero-shot solution to noisy linear inverse problems without retraining for specific inverse problems. Inspired by this finding, we propose to improve recent methods by using more principled covariance determined by maximum likelihood estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T13:35:39Z)
• Stochastic Gradient Descent for Gaussian Processes Done Right [86.83678041846971]
  We show that when emphdone right -- by which we mean using specific insights from optimisation and kernel communities -- gradient descent is highly effective. We introduce a emphstochastic dual descent algorithm, explain its design in an intuitive manner and illustrate the design choices. Our method places Gaussian process regression on par with state-of-the-art graph neural networks for molecular binding affinity prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T16:15:13Z)
• Adaptive operator learning for infinite-dimensional Bayesian inverse problems [7.716833952167609]
  We develop an adaptive operator learning framework that can reduce modeling error gradually by forcing the surrogate to be accurate in local areas. We present a rigorous convergence guarantee in the linear case using the UKI framework. The numerical results show that our method can significantly reduce computational costs while maintaining inversion accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T01:50:33Z)
• Refining Amortized Posterior Approximations using Gradient-Based Summary Statistics [0.9176056742068814]
  We present an iterative framework to improve the amortized approximations of posterior distributions in the context of inverse problems. We validate our method in a controlled setting by applying it to a stylized problem, and observe improved posterior approximations with each iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:47:19Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Variational Laplace Autoencoders [53.08170674326728]
  Variational autoencoders employ an amortized inference model to approximate the posterior of latent variables. We present a novel approach that addresses the limited posterior expressiveness of fully-factorized Gaussian assumption. We also present a general framework named Variational Laplace Autoencoders (VLAEs) for training deep generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T18:59:27Z)
• RMFGP: Rotated Multi-fidelity Gaussian process with Dimension Reduction for High-dimensional Uncertainty Quantification [12.826754199680474]
  Multi-fidelity modelling enables accurate inference even when only a small set of accurate data is available. By combining the realizations of the high-fidelity model with one or more low-fidelity models, the multi-fidelity method can make accurate predictions of quantities of interest. This paper proposes a new dimension reduction framework based on rotated multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression and a Bayesian active learning scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T01:20:35Z)
• Mixtures of Gaussian Processes for regression under multiple prior distributions [0.0]
  We extend the idea of Mixture models for Gaussian Process regression in order to work with multiple prior beliefs at once. We consider the usage of our approach to additionally account for the problem of prior misspecification in functional regression problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T10:19:14Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Meta Learning as Bayes Risk Minimization [18.76745359031975]
  We use a probabilistic framework to formalize what it means for two tasks to be related. In our formulation, the BRM optimal solution is given by the predictive distribution computed from the posterior distribution of the task-specific latent variable conditioned on the contextual dataset. We show that our approximation of the posterior distributions converges to the maximum likelihood estimate with the same rate as the true posterior distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T09:38:00Z)
• Efficiently Sampling Functions from Gaussian Process Posteriors [76.94808614373609]
  We propose an easy-to-use and general-purpose approach for fast posterior sampling. We demonstrate how decoupled sample paths accurately represent Gaussian process posteriors at a fraction of the usual cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T14:03:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.