Tailoring Requirements Engineering for Responsible AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.10816v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:48:59 GMT
• Title: Tailoring Requirements Engineering for Responsible AI
• Authors: Walid Maalej, Yen Dieu Pham and Larissa Chazette
• Abstract summary: We argue that Requirements Engineering (RE) should not only be carefully conducted but also tailored for Responsible AI. We outline related challenges for research and practice.
• Score: 7.713240800142864
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Requirements Engineering (RE) is the discipline for identifying, analyzing, as well as ensuring the implementation and delivery of user, technical, and societal requirements. Recently reported issues concerning the acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions after deployment, e.g. in the medical, automotive, or scientific domains, stress the importance of RE for designing and delivering Responsible AI systems. In this paper, we argue that RE should not only be carefully conducted but also tailored for Responsible AI. We outline related challenges for research and practice.

Related papers

• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• How Mature is Requirements Engineering for AI-based Systems? A Systematic Mapping Study on Practices, Challenges, and Future Research Directions [5.6818729232602205]
  It is unclear if existing RE methods are sufficient or if new ones are needed to address these challenges. Existing RE4AI research focuses mainly on requirements analysis and elicitation, with most practices applied in these areas. We identified requirements specification, explainability, and the gap between machine learning engineers and end-users as the most prevalent challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T11:28:16Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systems [45.31340537171788]
  Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) generate vast data sets that can be leveraged by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for applications including predictive maintenance and production planning. Despite the demonstrated potential of AI, its widespread adoption in sectors like manufacturing remains limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:54:41Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Responsible Design Patterns for Machine Learning Pipelines [10.184056098238765]
  AI ethics involves applying ethical principles to the entire life cycle of AI systems. This is essential to mitigate potential risks and harms associated with AI, such as biases. To achieve this goal, responsible design patterns (RDPs) are critical for Machine Learning (ML) pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T15:47:12Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Can Requirements Engineering Support Explainable Artificial Intelligence? Towards a User-Centric Approach for Explainability Requirements [9.625088778011717]
  We discuss synergies between requirements engineering (RE) and Explainable AI (XAI) We highlight challenges in the field of XAI, and propose a framework and research directions on how RE practices can help to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-03T11:17:41Z)
• Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
  We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering. In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z)
• Software Engineering for Responsible AI: An Empirical Study and Operationalised Patterns [20.747681252352464]
  We propose a template that enables AI ethics principles to be operationalised in the form of concrete patterns. These patterns provide concrete, operationalised guidance that facilitate the development of responsible AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T02:18:27Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.