Fair Correlation Clustering in Forests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11295v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:27:06 GMT
• Title: Fair Correlation Clustering in Forests
• Authors: Katrin Casel, Tobias Friedrich, Martin Schirneck, Simon Wietheger
• Abstract summary: A clustering is said to be fair, if each cluster has the same distribution of manifestations of a sensitive attribute as the whole input set. This is motivated by various applications where the objects to be clustered have sensitive attributes that should not be over- or underrepresented. We consider restricted graph classes which allow us to characterize the distributions of sensitive attributes for which this form of fairness is tractable.
• Score: 8.810926150873991
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The study of algorithmic fairness received growing attention recently. This stems from the awareness that bias in the input data for machine learning systems may result in discriminatory outputs. For clustering tasks, one of the most central notions of fairness is the formalization by Chierichetti, Kumar, Lattanzi, and Vassilvitskii [NeurIPS 2017]. A clustering is said to be fair, if each cluster has the same distribution of manifestations of a sensitive attribute as the whole input set. This is motivated by various applications where the objects to be clustered have sensitive attributes that should not be over- or underrepresented. We discuss the applicability of this fairness notion to Correlation Clustering. The existing literature on the resulting Fair Correlation Clustering problem either presents approximation algorithms with poor approximation guarantees or severely limits the possible distributions of the sensitive attribute (often only two manifestations with a 1:1 ratio are considered). Our goal is to understand if there is hope for better results in between these two extremes. To this end, we consider restricted graph classes which allow us to characterize the distributions of sensitive attributes for which this form of fairness is tractable from a complexity point of view. While existing work on Fair Correlation Clustering gives approximation algorithms, we focus on exact solutions and investigate whether there are efficiently solvable instances. The unfair version of Correlation Clustering is trivial on forests, but adding fairness creates a surprisingly rich picture of complexities. We give an overview of the distributions and types of forests where Fair Correlation Clustering turns from tractable to intractable. The most surprising insight to us is the fact that the cause of the hardness of Fair Correlation Clustering is not the strictness of the fairness condition.

Related papers

• Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directions [11.077625489695922]
  Clustering is a fundamental problem in machine learning and operations research. We take a critical view of fair clustering, identifying a collection of ignored issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T23:34:53Z)
• How Robust is Your Fairness? Evaluating and Sustaining Fairness under Unseen Distribution Shifts [107.72786199113183]
  We propose a novel fairness learning method termed CUrvature MAtching (CUMA) CUMA achieves robust fairness generalizable to unseen domains with unknown distributional shifts. We evaluate our method on three popular fairness datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T02:37:50Z)
• Counterfactual Fairness with Partially Known Causal Graph [85.15766086381352]
  This paper proposes a general method to achieve the notion of counterfactual fairness when the true causal graph is unknown. We find that counterfactual fairness can be achieved as if the true causal graph were fully known, when specific background knowledge is provided.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T13:40:50Z)
• Fair Group-Shared Representations with Normalizing Flows [68.29997072804537]
  We develop a fair representation learning algorithm which is able to map individuals belonging to different groups in a single group. We show experimentally that our methodology is competitive with other fair representation learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T10:49:49Z)
• Efficient Algorithms For Fair Clustering with a New Fairness Notion [5.21410307583181]
  We revisit the problem of fair clustering, first introduced by Chierichetti et al. Existing solutions to fair clustering are either not scalable or do not achieve an optimal trade-off between clustering objective and fairness. We propose a new notion of fairness, which we call $tau$-fair fairness, that strictly generalizes the balance property and enables a fine-grained efficiency vs. fairness trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T04:52:49Z)
• MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning [52.24956510371455]
  We study multi-group fairness in machine learning (MultiFair) We propose a generic end-to-end algorithmic framework to solve it. Our proposed framework is generalizable to many different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T02:30:22Z)
• Protecting Individual Interests across Clusters: Spectral Clustering with Guarantees [20.350342151402963]
  We propose an individual fairness criterion for clustering a graph $mathcalG$ that requires each cluster to contain an adequate number of members connected to the individual. We devise a spectral clustering algorithm to find fair clusters under a given representation graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-08T15:03:25Z)
• Learning to Generate Fair Clusters from Demonstrations [27.423983748614198]
  We show how to identify the intended fairness constraint for a problem based on limited demonstrations from an expert. We present an algorithm to identify the fairness metric from demonstrations and generate clusters using existing off-the-shelf clustering techniques. We investigate how to generate interpretable solutions using our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T03:09:33Z)
• A Pairwise Fair and Community-preserving Approach to k-Center Clustering [34.386585230600716]
  Clustering is a foundational problem in machine learning with numerous applications. We define two new types of fairness in the clustering setting, pairwise fairness and community preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T22:32:27Z)
• Fair Hierarchical Clustering [92.03780518164108]
  We define a notion of fairness that mitigates over-representation in traditional clustering. We show that our algorithms can find a fair hierarchical clustering, with only a negligible loss in the objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T01:05:11Z)
• Fair Correlation Clustering [92.15492066925977]
  We obtain approximation algorithms for correlation clustering under several important types of fairness constraints. We show that fair solutions to correlation clustering can be obtained with limited increase in cost compared to the state-of-the-art (unfair) algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-06T14:28:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.