Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03300v2
• Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 07:58:28 GMT
• Title: Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approach
• Authors: Zhimeng Jiang, Xiaotian Han, Hongye Jin, Guanchu Wang, Rui Chen, Na Zou, Xia Hu
• Abstract summary: We first theoretically demonstrate the inherent connection between distribution shift, data perturbation, and model weight perturbation. We then analyze the sufficient conditions to guarantee fairness for the target dataset. Motivated by these sufficient conditions, we propose robust fairness regularization (RFR)
• Score: 72.19525160912943
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fairness in machine learning has attracted increasing attention in recent years. The fairness methods improving algorithmic fairness for in-distribution data may not perform well under distribution shifts. In this paper, we first theoretically demonstrate the inherent connection between distribution shift, data perturbation, and model weight perturbation. Subsequently, we analyze the sufficient conditions to guarantee fairness (i.e., low demographic parity) for the target dataset, including fairness for the source dataset, and low prediction difference between the source and target datasets for each sensitive attribute group. Motivated by these sufficient conditions, we propose robust fairness regularization (RFR) by considering the worst case within the model weight perturbation ball for each sensitive attribute group. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed RFR algorithm on synthetic and real distribution shifts across various datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that RFR achieves better fairness-accuracy trade-off performance compared with several baselines. The source code is available at \url{https://github.com/zhimengj0326/RFR_NeurIPS23}.

Related papers

• Fair CoVariance Neural Networks [34.68621550644667]
  We propose Fair coVariance Neural Networks (FVNNs), which perform graph convolutions on the covariance matrix for both fair and accurate predictions. We prove that FVNNs are intrinsically fairer than analogous PCA approaches thanks to their stability in low sample regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T06:24:18Z)
• Dr. FERMI: A Stochastic Distributionally Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization Framework [12.734559823650887]
  In the presence of distribution shifts, fair machine learning models may behave unfairly on test data. Existing algorithms require full access to data and cannot be used when small batches are used. This paper proposes the first distributionally robust fairness framework with convergence guarantees that do not require knowledge of the causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T23:25:28Z)
• Fair GANs through model rebalancing for extremely imbalanced class distributions [5.463417677777276]
  We present an approach to construct an unbiased generative adversarial network (GAN) from an existing biased GAN. We show results for the StyleGAN2 models while training on the Flickr Faces High Quality (FFHQ) dataset for racial fairness. We further validate our approach by applying it to an imbalanced CIFAR10 dataset which is also twice as large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T19:20:06Z)
• Fair-CDA: Continuous and Directional Augmentation for Group Fairness [48.84385689186208]
  We propose a fine-grained data augmentation strategy for imposing fairness constraints. We show that group fairness can be achieved by regularizing the models on transition paths of sensitive features between groups. Our proposed method does not assume any data generative model and ensures good generalization for both accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T11:23:00Z)
• Transferring Fairness under Distribution Shifts via Fair Consistency Regularization [15.40257564187799]
  We study how to transfer model fairness under distribution shifts, a widespread issue in practice. Inspired by the success of self-training in transferring accuracy under domain shifts, we derive a sufficient condition for transferring group fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-26T06:19:56Z)
• FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes [51.02407217197623]
  We propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set where the sample weights are computed. We show that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T05:14:48Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• The Impact of Data Distribution on Fairness and Robustness in Federated Learning [7.209240273742224]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning protocol that allows a set of agents to collaboratively train a model without sharing their datasets. In this work, we look at how variations in local data distributions affect the fairness and the properties of the trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T22:04:50Z)
• Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalization [89.73665256847858]
  We show that out-of-distribution performance is strongly correlated with in-distribution performance for a wide range of models and distribution shifts. Specifically, we demonstrate strong correlations between in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance on variants of CIFAR-10 & ImageNet. We also investigate cases where the correlation is weaker, for instance some synthetic distribution shifts from CIFAR-10-C and the tissue classification dataset Camelyon17-WILDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T19:48:23Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.